Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. D. J. Brenner and E. J. Hall, “Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure,” N. Engl. J. Med. 357(22), 22772284 (2007).
2. J. Hsieh, Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2003).
3. M. Gies, W. A. Kalender, H. Wolf, C. Suess, and M. T. Madsen, “Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies,” Med. Phys. 26, 22352247 (1999).
4. W. A. Kalender, H. Wolf, and C. Suess, “Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements,” Med. Phys. 26, 22482253 (1999).
5. M. J. Tapiovaara and R. Wagner, “SNR and DQE analysis of broad spectrum x-ray imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol. 30, 519529 (1985).
6. E. Roessl and R. Proksa, “K-edge imaging in x-ray computed tomography using multi-bin photon counting detectors,” Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 46794696 (2007).
7. K. Taguchi, S. Srivastava, H. Kudo, and W. C. Barber, “Enabling photon counting clinical x-ray CT,” Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC) (IEEE, New York, NY, 2009), pp. 35813585.
8. K. Taguchi, E. C. Frey, X. Wang, J. S. Iwanczyk, and W. C. Barber, “An analytical model of the effects of pulse pileup on the energy spectrum recorded by energy resolved photon counting x-ray detectors,” Med. Phys. 37(8), 39573969 (2010).
9. J. S. Arenson, D. Ruimi, O. Meirav, and R. H. Armstrong, General Electric Company, “X-ray flux management device,” U.S. patent 7,330,535 (12 Feb 2008).
10. T. L. Toth and T. Bernstein, General Electric Company, “Method and apparatus of modulating the filtering of radiation during radiographic imaging,” U.S. patent 6,836,535 (28 Dec 2004).
11. T. L. Toth, J. E. Tkaczyk, and J. Hsieh, General Electric Company, “Method and apparatus of radiographic imaging with an energy beam tailored for a subject to be scanned,” U.S. patent 7,076,029 (11 July 2006).
12. T. P. Szczykutowicz and C. Mistretta, “Practical considerations for intensity modulated CT,” Proc. SPIE 8313, 83134E (2012).
13. B. Hasegawa, S. Naimuddin, J. Dobbins, C. Mistretta, W. Peppler, N. Hangiandreou, J. Cusma, J. McDermott, B. Kudva, and K. Melbye, “Digital beam attenuator technique for compensated chest radiography,” Radiology 159(2), 537543 (1986).
14. W. Peppler, B. Kudva, J. Dobbins, C. Lee, M. Vanlysel, B. Hasegawa, C. Mistretta, “Digitally controlled beam attenuator,” Proc. SPIE 0347, 106111 (1982).
15. S. Bartolac, S. Graham, J. Siewerdsen, and D. Jaffray, “Fluence field optimization for noise and dose objectives in CT,” Med. Phys. 38, S2S17 (2011).
16. J. Sperl, D. Beque, B. Claus, B. De Man, B. Senzig, and M. Brokate, “Computer-assisted scan protocol and reconstruction (CASPAR)—Reduction of image noise and patient dose,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(3), 724732 (2010).
17. S. L. Fritz and W. H. Livingston, “A comparison of computed and measured heel effect for various target angles,” Med. Phys. 9, 216219 (1982).
18.National Biomedical Imaging Archive (available URL:
19.CASIMAGE Radiology Teaching Files Database (available URL:
20. M. Grant and S. Boyd, CVX: MATLAB software for disciplined convex programming, version 1.21 (CVX Research, Inc., Austin, TX, 2011).
21. M. Grant and S. Boyd, “Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs,” in Recent Advances in Learning and Control, edited by V. Blondel, S. Boyd, H. Kimura (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 95110.
22. D. A. Chesler, S. J. Riederer, and N. J. Pelc, “Noise due to photon counting statistics in computed x-ray tomography,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1(1), 6474 (1977).
23. S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. Arce, M. Asai, D. Axen, S. Banerjee, and G. Barrand, “Geant4: A simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 506(3), 250303 (2003).
24. P. M. Joseph and R. D. Spital, “A method for correcting bone induced artifacts in computed tomography scanners,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2(1), 100108 (1978).
25. T. P. Szczykutowicz and C. A. Mistretta, “Design of a digital beam attenuation system for computed tomography: Part I. System design and simulation framework,” Med. Phys. 40, 021905 (12pp.) (2013).
26. T. P. Szczykutowicz and C. A. Mistretta, “Design of a digital beam attenuation system for computed tomography. Part II. Performance study and initial results,” Med. Phys. 40, 021906 (9pp.) (2013).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...




The prepatient attenuator (or “bowtie filter”) in CT is used to modulate the flux as a function of fan angle of the x-ray beam incident on the patient. Traditional, static bowtie filters are tailored only for very generic scans and for the average patient. The authors propose a design for a dynamic bowtie that can produce a time-dependent piecewise-linear attenuation profile. This dynamic bowtie may reduce dynamic range, dose or scatter, but in this work they focus on its ability to reduce dynamic range, which may be particularly important for systems employing photon-counting detectors.


The dynamic bowtie is composed of a set of triangular wedges. Each wedge is independently moved in order to produce a time-dependent piecewise-linear attenuation profile. Simulations of the bowtie are conducted to estimate the dynamic range reduction in six clinical datasets. The control of the dynamic bowtie is determined by solving a convex optimization problem, and the dose is estimated using Monte Carlo techniques. Beam hardening artifacts are also simulated.


The dynamic range is reduced by factors ranging from 2.4 to 27 depending on the part of the body studied. With a dynamic range minimization objective, the dose to the patient can be reduced from 6% to 33% while maintaining peak image noise. Further reduction in dose may be possible with a specific dose reduction objective. Beam hardening artifacts are suppressed with a two-pass algorithm.


A dynamic bowtie producing a time-dependent, piecewise-linear attenuation profile is possible and can be used to modulate the flux of the scanner to the imaging task. Initial simulations show a large reduction in dynamic range. Several other applications are possible.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd