1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
Micro-CT artifacts reduction based on detector random shifting and fast data inpainting
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/3/10.1118/1.4790697
1.
1. G. F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement (Wiley, New York, 2010).
2.
2. M. Nikl, “Scintillation detectors for x-rays,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, R37R54 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/17/4/R01
3.
3. L. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, and J. W. Kress, “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1(6), 612619 (1984).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612
4.
4. J. Sijbers and A. Postnov, “Reduction of ring artefacts in high resolution micro-ct reconstructions,” Phys. Med. Biol. 49, N247N253 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/14/N06
5.
5. M. Rivers, “Tutorial introduction to x-ray computed microtomography data processing,” University of Chicago, 1998 (available URL: http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/X-ray-cmt/rivers/tutorial.html).
6.
6. G. R. Davis and J. C. Elliott, “X-ray microtomography scanner using time-delay integration for elimination of ring artefacts in the reconstructed image,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 394(1), 157162 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00566-4
7.
7. M. Albani and B. Klinkenberg, “A spatial filter for the removal of striping artifacts in digital elevation models,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 69, 755765 (2003).
8.
8. M. Boin and A. Haibel, “Compensation of ring artefacts in synchrotron tomographic images,” Opt. Express 14(25), 1207112075 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.012071
9.
9. P. Rakwatin, W. Takeuchi, and Y. Yasuoka, “Stripe noise reduction in modis data by combining histogram matching with facet filter,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45(6), 18441856 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.895841
10.
10. F. Tsai, S. Q. Lin, J. Y. Rau, L. C. Chen, and G. R. Liu, “Destriping hyperion imagery using spline interpolation,” in Proceedings of the 26th Asian Conference Remote Sensing, November, Hanoi, Vietnam (2005).
11.
11. K. Arrell, S. Wise, J. Wood, and D. Donoghue, “Spectral filtering as a method of visualising and removing striped artefacts in digital elevation data,” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 33(6), 943961 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.1597
12.
12. X. Tang, R. Ning, R. Yu, and D. Conover, “A 2d wavelet-analysis-based calibration technique for panel imaging detectors: Application in cone beam volume ct.” Proc. SPIE 3659, 806816 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.349561
13.
13. B. Münch, P. Trtik, F. Marone, and M. Stampanoni, “Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined waveletfourier filtering,” Opt. Express 17(10), 85678591 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.008567
14.
14. S. Rashid, S. Y. Lee, and M. K. Hasan , “An improved method for the removal of ring artifacts in high resolution ct imaging,” EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process, New Orleans, LA (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2012-93
15.
15. M. Bertalmio, G. Sapiro, V. Caselles, and C. Ballester, “Image inpainting,” in Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 2000), pp. 417424.
16.
16. T. F. Chan and J. Shen, “Mathematical models for local nontexture inpaintings,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 7, 10191043 (2001).
17.
17. S. Lin et al., “Highlight removal by illumination-constrained inpainting,” in Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Nice, France (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2003), pp. 164169.
18.
18. C. Brito-Loeza and K. Chen, “Multigrid method for a modified curvature driven diffusion model for image inpainting,” J. Comput. Math. 26(6), 856875 (2008).
19.
19. T. F. Chan and J. Shen, “Nontexture inpainting by curvature-driven diffusions,” J. Visual Commun. Image Represent 12 (4), 436449 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvci.2001.0487
20.
20. A. Criminisi, P. Perez, and K. Toyama, “Object removal by exemplar-based inpainting,” in Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, Wisconsin (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2003), Vol. 2, pp. II721.
21.
21. A. Criminisi, P. Pérez, and K. Toyama, “Region filling and object removal by exemplar-based image inpainting,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(9), 12001212 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2004.833105
22.
22. J. Wu and Q. Ruan, “Object removal by cross isophotes exemplar-based inpainting,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR, Hong Kong, China (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2006), Vol. 3, pp. 810813.
23.
23. E. M. Kamel, C. Burger, A. Buck, G. K. von Schulthess, and G. W. Goerres, “Impact of metallic dental implants on ct-based attenuation correction in a combined pet/ct scanner,” Eur. Radiol. 13(4), 724728 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1564-2
24.
24. A. Mehranian, M. R. Ay, A. Rahmim, and H. Zaidi, “Sparsity constrained sinogram inpainting for metal artifact reduction in x-ray computed tomography,” in Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2011), pp. 36943699.
25.
25. H. Xue, L. Zhang, Y. Xiao, Z. Chen, and Y. Xing, “Metal artifact reduction in dual energy ct by sinogram segmentation based on active contour model and tv inpainting,” in Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2009), pp. 904908.
26.
26. A. H. Andersen and A. C. Kak, “Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (sart): A superior implementation of the art algorithm,” Ultrason. imaging 6(1), 8194 (1984).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0161-7346(84)90008-7
27.
27. K. Lange et al., “Em reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8(2), 306316 (1984).
28.
28. K. Mueller and F. Xu , “Practical considerations for gpu-accelerated ct,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, Arlington, Virginia (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2006), pp. 11841187.
29.
29. G. Wang and M. Jiang, “Ordered-subset simultaneous algebraic reconstruction techniques (os-sart),” J. X-Ray Sci. Technol. 12(3), 169178 (2004).
30.
30. X. Zhao, J. Hu, and P. Zhang, “Gpu-based 3d cone-beam ct image reconstruction for large data volume,” Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2009 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/149079
31.
31. Y. Zhu, Y. Zhao, and X. Zhao, “A multi-thread scheduling method for 3d ct image reconstruction using multi-gpu,” J. X-Ray Sci. Technol. 20(2), 187197 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/XST-2012-0328
32.
32. G. Lauritsch and H. Bruder, “Head phantom,” 2012 (available URL: http://www.imp.uni-erlangen.de/phantoms/head/head.html).
33.
33. S. Tang, X. Mou, Y. Yang, Q. Xu, and H. Yu , “Application of projection simulation based on physical imaging model to the evaluation of beam hardening corrections in x-ray transmission tomography,” J. X-Ray Sci. Technol. 16(2), 95117 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.11.007
34.
34. S. Tang, H. Yu, H. Yan, D. Bharkhada, and X. Mou, “X-ray projection simulation based on physical imaging model,” J. X-Ray Sci. Technol. 14(3), 177189 (2006).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/3/10.1118/1.4790697
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/3/10.1118/1.4790697
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/3/10.1118/1.4790697
2013-02-28
2014-09-18

Abstract

Purpose:

In Micro-CT systems based on optical coupling detectors, the defects of scintillator or CCD-camera would lead to heavy artifacts in reconstructed CT images. Meanwhile, different detector units usually suffer from inhomogeneous response, which also leads to artifacts in the CT images. Detector shifting is a simple and efficient method to remove the artifacts due to inhomogeneous responses of detector units. However, it does not work well for heavy artifacts due to defects in scintillator or CCD. The purpose of this paper is to develop a data preprocessing method to reduce both kinds of artifacts.

Methods:

A hybrid method which involves detector random shifting and data inpainting is proposed to correct the projection data, so as to suppress the artifacts in the reconstructed CT images. The defects in scintillator or CCD-camera lead to data lost in some areas of the projection data. The Criminisi algorithm is employed to recover the lost data. By detector random shifting, the location of the lost data in one view might be shifted away in adjacent views. This feature is utilized to design the search window, such that the best match patch shall be searched across adjacent views. By this way, the best match patches should really enjoy high similarity. As a result, the heavy artifacts due to defects of scintillator or CCD-camera should be suppressed. Furthermore, a multiscale tessellation method is proposed to locate the defects and similarity patches, which makes the Criminisi algorithm very fast.

Results:

The authors tested the proposed method on both simulated projection data and real projection data. Experiments show that the proposed method could correct the bad data in the projections quite well. Compared to other popular methods, such as linear interpolation, wavelet combining Fourier transform, and TV-inpainting, experimental results suggest that the CT images reconstructed from the preprocessed data sets by our method is significantly better in quality.

Conclusions:

They have proposed a hybrid method for projection data preprocessing which fits well to typical Micro-CT systems. The hybrid method could suppress the ring artifacts in the reconstructed CT images efficiently, while the spatial resolution is not reduced even with a critical eye.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/40/3/1.4790697.html;jsessionid=6b3k8agh06p5b.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/3/10.1118/1.4790697&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys

Most read this month

Article
content/aapm/journal/medphys
Journal
5
3
Loading

Most cited this month

true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Micro-CT artifacts reduction based on detector random shifting and fast data inpainting
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/3/10.1118/1.4790697
10.1118/1.4790697
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM