1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Evaluating noise reduction techniques while considering anatomical noise in dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.4799841
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/5/10.1118/1.4799841
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/5/10.1118/1.4799841
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of DE image formation.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) NNPS not considering anatomical noise (i.e., NNPS). (b) NNPS and NNPS considering anatomical noise for = 0.8.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) NNPS and NNPS when considering anatomical noise for = 0.1. (b) NNPS of the clinical image using different noise reduction parameters.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Clockwise from top left: SWS, ACNR, = 0.8, and ACNR, = 0.1.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/5/10.1118/1.4799841
2013-04-09
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Evaluating noise reduction techniques while considering anatomical noise in dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/5/10.1118/1.4799841
10.1118/1.4799841
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM