1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
On the use of a single-fiber multipoint plastic scintillation detector for 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.4803510
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/6/10.1118/1.4803510
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/6/10.1118/1.4803510

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

System of coordinates used in this study to express the position of the Ir brachytherapy source relative to the mPSD. The center of scintillator (Scint.) #1 was defined as z = 0, r = 0.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Experimental setup and positioning template system (embedded). Catheters were connected to transfer tubes, which were connected to the afterloader. The PSD was connected to the spectrometry setup outside the treatment room (Ref. ).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

For (a) r = 1 cm, (b) r = 2 cm, (c) r = 3 cm, and (d) r = 5 cm: (Top) Dose measured by each scintillating element (Scint.) together with the calculated expected dose. (Bottom) Accuracy of the measurement. Scint.1 is at z = 0 cm, scint. 2 at z = 2.53 cm, and scint. 3 at z = 4.99 cm.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Effect of the weighted approach combining measurements from each scintillating element (Scint.) on dose measurement accuracy at r = 3 cm.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Effect of various dose thresholds on the averaged accuracy measurement for scintillating element #3.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Relative uncertainty of the measurements from scintillating element #2 as a function of integration time and radial source-to-mPSD distance.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Effects of the measurement, position, and total uncertainties on precision for all three scintillating elements: (a) Scint. 1, (b) Scint. 2, (c) Scint. 3 at r = 1 cm.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Maps of the offset between the expected and calculated positions of the Ir source as a function of the position of each of the scintillators (Scint.) and of the weighted approach. Scintillator 1 is at z = 0 cm, scintillator 2 at z = 2.53 cm, and scintillator 3 at z = 4.99 cm.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

The variables of dose determination and how uncertainties were calculated.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Averaged accuracy and standard deviation (sd) for dose measurement by each scintillating element (Scint.) of the mPSD and with the weighted combination for different radial distances r.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Proportion of the measured positions above or below a certain position offset threshold for the each scintillating element (Scint.) and for the weighted approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/6/10.1118/1.4803510
2013-05-09
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: On the use of a single-fiber multipoint plastic scintillation detector for 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/6/10.1118/1.4803510
10.1118/1.4803510
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM