NOTICE: Scitation Maintenance Sunday, March 1, 2015.

Scitation users may experience brief connectivity issues on Sunday, March 1, 2015 between 12:00 AM and 7:00 AM EST due to planned network maintenance.

Thank you for your patience during this process.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Onboard functional and molecular imaging: A design investigation for robotic multipinhole SPECT
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
1. J. Bowsher, J. Dempsey, J. Lagendijk, M. Mitsuya, B. Raaymakers, R. Stark, Y. Takai, and F. Yin, “Emerging in-room imaging technologies,” in Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Perspective, edited by Arno J. Mundt and John C. Roeske (PMPH USA Limited, Shelton, CT, 2011), pp. 156164.
2. C. H. Min, X. Zhu, B. A. Winey, K. Grogg, M. Testa, G. El Fakhri, T. R. Bortfeld, H. Paganetti, and H. A. Shih, “Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 86(1), 183189 (2013).
3. J. Roper, J. Bowsher, and F. F. Yin, “Direction-dependent localization errors in SPECT images,” Med. Phys. 37(9), 48864896 (2010).
4. T. F. Massoud and S. S. Gambhir, “Molecular imaging in living subjects: Seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light,” Genes Dev. 17(5), 545580 (2003).
5. C. C. Ling, J. Humm, S. Larson, H. Amols, Z. Fuks, S. Leibel, and J. A. Koutcher, “Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): Biological imaging and biological conformality,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 47(3), 551560 (2000).
6. H. P. Rodemann, “Molecular radiation biology: Perspectives for radiation oncology,” Radiother. Oncol. 92(3), 293298 (2009).
7. S. Heller and P. Zanzonico, “Nuclear probes and intraoperative gamma cameras,” Semin. Nucl. Med. 41(3), 166181 (2011).
8. T. Wendler, K. Herrmann, A. Schnelzer, T. Lasser, J. Traub, O. Kutter, A. Ehlerding, K. Scheidhauer, T. Schuster, M. Kiechle, M. Schwaiger, N. Navab, S. I. Ziegler, and A. K. Buck, “First demonstration of 3-D lymphatic mapping in breast cancer using freehand SPECT,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 37(8), 14521461 (2010).
9. C. Bluemel, A. Schnelzer, A. Okur, A. Ehlerding, S. Paepke, K. Scheidhauer, and M. Kiechle, “Freehand SPECT for image-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 40(11), 16561661 (2013).
10. A. Seret, “Will high-resolution/high-sensitivity SPECT ensure that PET is not the only survivor in nuclear medicine during the next decade?,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 36(3), 533535 (2009).
11. T. Funk, D. L. Kirch, J. E. Koss, E. Botvinick, and B. H. Hasegawa, “A novel approach to multipinhole SPECT for myocardial perfusion imaging,” J. Nucl. Med. 47(4), 595602 (2006).
12. M. U. Zaman, I. Hashmi, and N. Fatima, “Recent developments and future prospects of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging,” Ann. Nucl. Med. 24(8), 565569 (2010).
13. E. V. Garcia, T. L. Faber, and F. P. Esteves, “Cardiac dedicated ultrafast SPECT cameras: New designs and clinical implications,” J. Nucl. Med. 52(2), 210217 (2011).
14. B. L. Franc, P. D. Acton, C. Mari, and B. H. Hasegawa, “Small-animal SPECT and SPECT/CT: Important tools for preclinical investigation,” J. Nucl. Med. 49(10), 16511663 (2008).
15. J. Nuyts, K. Vunckx, M. Defrise, and C. Vanhove, “Small animal imaging with multi-pinhole SPECT,” Methods 48(2), 8391 (2009).
16. W. Branderhorst, B. Vastenhouw, F. van der Have, E. L. Blezer, W. K. Bleeker, and F. J. Beekman, “Targeted multi-pinhole SPECT,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 38(3), 552561 (2011).
17. R. A. Vogel, D. Kirch, M. LeFree, and P. Steele, “A new method of multiplanar emission tomography using a seven pinhole collimator and an anger scintillation camera,” J. Nucl. Med. 19(6), 648654 (1978).
18. B. Hasegawa, D. Kirch, D. Stern, M. Adams, J. Sklar, T. Johnson, and P. Steele, “Single-photon emission tomography with a 12-pinhole collimator,” J. Nucl. Med. 23(7), 606612 (1982).
19. M. Ivanovic, D. A. Weber, and S. Loncaric, “Multi-pinhole collimator optimization for high resolution SPECT imaging,” in 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Albuquerque, NM.
20. W. P. Segars and B. M. W. Tsui, “MCAT to XCAT: The evolution of 4-D computerized phantoms for imaging research,” Proc. IEEE 97(12), 19541968 (2009).
21. G. L. Zeng, G. T. Gullberg, B. M. W. Tsui, and J. A. Terry, “3-Dimensional iterative reconstruction algorithms with attenuation and geometric point response correction,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38(2), 693702 (1991).
22. R. Accorsi and S. D. Metzler, “Analytic determination of the resolution-equivalent effective diameter of a pinhole collimator,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23(6), 750763 (2004).
23. S. D. Metzler, J. E. Bowsher, M. F. Smith, and R. J. Jaszczak, “Analytic determination of pinhole collimator sensitivity with penetration,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(8), 730741 (2001).
24. W. H. Press, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
25. R. Wojcik, S. Majewski, B. Kross, D. Steinbach, and A. G. Weisenberger, “High spatial resolution gamma imaging detector based on a 5 diameter R3292 Hamamatsu PSPMT,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 45(3), 487491 (1998).
26. J. G. Qian, E. L. Bradley, S. Majewski, V. Popov, M. S. Saha, M. F. Smith, A. G. Weisenberger, and R. E. Welsh, “A small-animal imaging system capable of multipinhole circular/helical SPECT and parallel-hole SPECT,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 594(1), 102110 (2008).
27. S. Majewski, J. Proffitt, J. McKisson, B. Kross, P. Martone, A. Stolin, A. Weisenberger, P. Judy, Z. Gong, K. Popovic, and M. Williams, “Design and initial evaluations of a round compact hand-held gamma imager based on SiPM technology,” in IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, Knoxville, TN, 2010.
28. K. Kerrou, S. Pitre, C. Coutant, R. Rouzier, P. Y. Ancel, C. Lebeaux, V. Huchet, F. Montravers, O. Pascal, M. A. Duval, F. Lefebvre, L. Menard, S. Uzan, Y. Charon, and E. Barranger, “The usefulness of a preoperative compact imager, a hand-held gamma-camera for breast cancer sentinel node biopsy: Final results of a prospective double-blind, clinical study,” J. Nucl. Med. 52(9), 13461353 (2011).
29. W. Siman and S. C. Kappadath, “Performance characteristics of a new pixelated portable gamma camera,” Med. Phys. 39(6), 34353444 (2012).
30. J. E. Bowsher and C. E. Floyd, “Treatment of Compton-scattering in maximum-likelihood, expectation-maximization reconstructions of SPECT images,” J. Nucl. Med. 32(6), 12851291 (1991).
31. B. F. Hutton, I. Buvat, and F. J. Beekman, “Review and current status of SPECT scatter correction,” Phys Med Biol. 56(14), R85R112 (2011).
32. S. Yan, J. E. Bowsher, and F.-F. Yin, “A line-source method for aligning on-board and other pinhole SPECT systems,” Med. Phys. 40, 122501 (12pp.) (2013).
33. D. J. Godfrey, F. F. Yin, M. Oldham, S. Yoo, and C. Willett, “Digital tomosynthesis with an on-board kilovoltage imaging device,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 65(1), 815 (2006).
34. F. Noo, M. Defrise, R. Clackdoyle, and H. Kudo, “Image reconstruction from fan-beam projections on less than a short scan,” Phys. Med. Biol. 47(14), 25252546 (2002).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Onboard imaging—currently performed primarily by x-ray transmission modalities—is essential in modern radiation therapy. As radiation therapy moves toward personalized medicine, molecular imaging, which views individual gene expression, may also be important onboard. Nuclear medicine methods, such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), are premier modalities for molecular imaging. The purpose of this study is to investigate a robotic multipinhole approach to onboard SPECT.

Computer-aided design (CAD) studies were performed to assess the feasibility of maneuvering a robotic SPECT system about a patient in position for radiation therapy. In order to obtain fast, high-quality SPECT images, a 49-pinhole SPECT camera was designed which provides high sensitivity to photons emitted from an imaging region of interest. This multipinhole system was investigated by computer-simulation studies. Seventeen hot spots 10 and 7 mm in diameter were placed in the breast region of a supine female phantom. Hot spot activity concentration was six times that of background. For the 49-pinhole camera and a reference, more conventional, broad field-of-view (FOV) SPECT system, projection data were computer simulated for 4-min scans and SPECT images were reconstructed. Hot-spot localization was evaluated using a nonprewhitening forced-choice numerical observer.

The CAD simulation studies found that robots could maneuver SPECT cameras about patients in position for radiation therapy. In the imaging studies, most hot spots were apparent in the 49-pinhole images. Average localization errors for 10-mm- and 7-mm-diameter hot spots were 0.4 and 1.7 mm, respectively, for the 49-pinhole system, and 3.1 and 5.7 mm, respectively, for the reference broad-FOV system.

A robot could maneuver a multipinhole SPECT system about a patient in position for radiation therapy. The system could provide onboard functional and molecular imaging with 4-min scan times.


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Onboard functional and molecular imaging: A design investigation for robotic multipinhole SPECT