No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Validation of simplified dosimetry approaches in 89
Zr-PET/CT: The use of manual versus semi-automatic delineation methods to estimate organ absorbed doses
1.P. K. Borjesson et al., “Radiation dosimetry of 89Zr-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody U36 as used for immuno-PET in head and neck cancer patients,” J. Nucl. Med. 50, 1828–1836 (2009).
2.L. R. Perk et al., “(89)Zr as a PET surrogate radioisotope for scouting biodistribution of the therapeutic radiometals (90)Y and (177)Lu in tumor-bearing nude mice after coupling to the internalizing antibody cetuximab,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 1898–1906 (2005).
3.S. N. Rizvi et al., “Biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and scouting of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using 89Zr-ibritumomab tiuxetan and PET,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 39, 512–520 (2012).
4.C. Hindorf, G. Glatting, C. Chiesa, O. Linden, and G. Flux, “EANM Dosimetry Committee guidelines for bone marrow and whole-body dosimetry,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 37, 1238–1250 (2010).
5.M. G. Stabin, R. B. Sparks, and E. Crowe, “ OLINDA/EXM: The second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 1023–1027 (2005).
6.F. H. van Velden et al., “Effects of rigid and non-rigid image registration on test-retest variability of quantitative [18F]FDG PET/CT studies,” EJNMMI Res. 2, 10 (2012).
7.D. F. Gutierrez and H. Zaidi, “Automated analysis of small animal PET studies through deformable registration to an atlas,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 39, 1807–1820 (2012).
8.S. Klein, M. Staring, K. Murphy, M. A. Viergever, and J. P. Pluim, “ elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 196–205 (2010).
9.S. Klein, M. Staring, P. Andersson, and J. P. Pluim, “Preconditioned stochastic gradient descent optimisation for monomodal image registration,” Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assisted. Intervention 14(Pt 2), 549–556 (2011).
11.D. P. Huttenlocher, G. A. Klanderman, and W. J. Rucklidge, “Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15, 850–863 (1993).
12.P. A. Jackson, J. M. Beauregard, M. S. Hofman, T. Kron, A. Hogg, and R. J. Hicks, “An automated voxelized dosimetry tool for radionuclide therapy based on serial quantitative SPECT/CT imaging,” Med. Phys. 40, 112503 (8pp.) (2013).
13.M. van Herk, K. G. Gilhuijs, J. de Munck, and A. Touw, “Effect of image artifacts, organ motion, and poor segmentation on the reliability and accuracy of three-dimensional chamfer matching,” Comput. Aided Surg. 2, 346–355 (1997).
Article metrics loading...
Increasing interest in immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) studies requires development of dosimetry methods which will provide accurate estimations of organ absorbed doses. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate simplified dosimetry approaches for 89Zirconium-PET (Zr-PET)/computed tomography (CT) studies.
Five patients with advanced colorectal cancer received 37.1 ± 0.9 MBq 89Zr-cetuximab within 2 h after administration of a therapeutic dose of 500 mg m−2 cetuximab. PET/CT scans were obtained 1, 24, 48, 94, and 144 h post injection. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually delineated in lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys for all scans, providing a reference VOI set. Simplified manual VOIs were drawn independently on CT scans using larger voxel sizes. The transformation of VOIs based on rigid and/or nonrigid registrations of the first CT scan (CT 1) onto all successive CT scans was also investigated. The transformation matrix obtained from each registration was applied to the manual VOIs of CT 1 to obtain VOIs for the successive scans. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance were used to assess the performance of the registrations. Organ total activity, organ absorbed dose, and effective dose were calculated for all methods.
Semi-automatic delineation based on nonrigid registration showed excellent agreement for lungs and liver (DSC: 0.90 ± 0.04; 0.81 ± 0.06) and good agreement for spleen and kidneys (DSC: 0.71 ± 0.07; 0.66 ± 0.08). Hausdorff distance ranged from 13 to 16 mm depending on the organ. Simplified manual delineation methods, in liver and lungs, performed similarly to semi-automatic delineation methods. For kidneys and spleen, however, poorer accuracy in total activity and absorbed dose was observed, as the voxel size increased. Organ absorbed dose and total activity based on nonrigid registration were within 10%. The effective dose was within ±3% for all VOI delineation methods.
A fast, semi-automatic, and accurate delineation method based on nonrigid registration was developed for determination of organ absorbed and effective dose in 89Zr-PET/CT studies which may also be applied to other long-lived radionuclide PET/CT studies.
Full text loading...
Most read this month