1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
A Monte Carlo investigation of low-Z target image quality generated in a linear accelerator using Varian's VirtuaLinaca)
a)VirtuaLinac is available by contacting one of the authors at montecarloresearch@varian.com or through the website RadiotherapyResearchTools.com.
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4861818
1.
1. J. L. Robar, “Generation and modelling of megavoltage photon beams for contrast-enhanced radiation therapy,” Phys. Med. Biol. 51(21), 54875504 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/21/007
2.
2. E. J. Orton and J. L. Robar, “Megavoltage image contrast with low-atomic number target materials and amorphous silicon electronic portal imagers,” Phys. Med. Biol. 54(5), 12751289 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/012
3.
3. T. Connell and J. L. Robar, “Low-Z target optimization for spatial resolution improvement in megavoltage imaging,” Med. Phys. 37(1), 124131 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3267040
4.
4. A. Tsechanski, A. F. Bielajew, S. Faermann, and Y. Krutman, “A thin target approach for portal imaging in medical accelerators,” Phys. Med. Biol. 43(8), 22212236 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/43/8/016
5.
5. D. Parsons and J. L. Robar, “Beam generation and planar imaging at energies below 2.40 MeV with carbon and aluminum linear accelerator targets,” Med. Phys. 39(7), 45684578 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4730503
6.
6. D. Parsons and J. L. Robar, “The effect of copper conversion plates on low-Z target image quality,” Med. Phys. 39(9), 53625371 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4742052
7.
7. S. Flampouri, P. M. Evans, F. Verhaegen, A. E. Nahum, E. Spezi, and M. Partridge, “Optimization of accelerator target and detector for portal imaging using Monte Carlo simulation and experiment,” Phys. Med. Biol. 47(18), 33313349 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/18/305
8.
8. D. A. Roberts, V. N. Hansen, A. C. Niven, M. G. Thompson, J. Seco, and P. M. Evans, “A low Z linac and flat panel imager: Comparison with the conventional imaging approach,” Phys. Med. Biol. 53(22), 63056319 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/22/003
9.
9. D. A. Roberts et al., “Kilovoltage energy imaging with a radiotherapy linac with a continuously variable energy range,” Med. Phys. 39(3), 12181226 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3681011
10.
10. O. Z. Ostapiak, P. F. O’Brien, and B. A. Faddegon, “Megavoltage imaging with low Z targets: Implementation and characterization of an investigational system,” Med. Phys. 25(10), 19101918 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598380
11.
11. B. A. Faddegon, V. Wu, J. Pouliot, B. Gangadharan, and A. Bani-Hashemi, “Low dose megavoltage cone beam computed tomography with an unflattened 4 MV beam from a carbon target,” Med. Phys. 35(12), 57775786 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3013571
12.
12. D. Sawkey et al., “A diamond target for megavoltage cone-beam CT,” Med. Phys. 37(3), 12461253 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3302831
13.
13. D. W. Rogers, B. A. Faddegon, G. X. Ding, C. M. Ma, J. We, and T. R. Mackie, “BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units,” Med. Phys. 22(5), 503524 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597552
14.
14. S. Agostinelli et al., “GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(3), 250303 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
15.
15. M. Constantin, D. E. Constantin, P. J. Keall, A. Narula, M. Svatos, and J. Perl, “Linking computer-aided design (CAD) to Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulations for precise implementation of complex treatment head geometries,” Phys. Med. Biol. 55(8), N211N220 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/8/N03
16.
16. M. Constantin et al., “Modeling the TrueBeam linac using a CAD to Geant4 geometry implementation: Dose and IAEA-compliant phase space calculations,” Med. Phys. 38(7), 40184024 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3598439
17.
17. E. Gete et al., “A Monte Carlo approach to validation of FFF VMAT treatment plans for the TrueBeam linac,” Med. Phys. 40(2), 021707 (13pp.) (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4773883
18.
18. INDC International Nuclear Data Committee, Phase-Space Database for External Beam Radiotherapy Summary Report of a Consultants’ Meeting (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2006).
19.
19. D. Sawkey et al., “Measurement of incident electron spots on TrueBeam,” Med. Phys. 40(6), 332 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4814982
20.
20. Z. Chang et al., “Commissioning and dosimetric characteristics of TrueBeam system: Composite data of three TrueBeam machines,” Med. Phys. 39(11), 69817018 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4762682
21.
21. C. M. Ma and D. W. O. Rogers, BEAMdp Users Manual NRCC Report PIRS-0509(C)revA (NRCC, Ottawa, Canada, 2009).
22.
22. S. Lang, J. Hrbacek, A. Leong, and S. Klöck, “Ion-recombination correction for different ionization chambers in high dose rate flattening-filter-free photon beams,” Phys. Med. Biol. 57(9), 28192827 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/9/2819
23.
23. I. Kawrakow, “Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version,” Med. Phys. 27(3), 485498 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598917
24.
24. P. Munro and D. C. Bouius, “X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays,” Med. Phys. 25(5), 689702 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598252
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4861818
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4861818
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4861818
2014-01-23
2014-09-17

Abstract

The focus of this work was the demonstration and validation of VirtuaLinac with clinical photon beams and to investigate the implementation of low-Z targets in a TrueBeam linear accelerator (Linac) using Monte Carlo modeling.

VirtuaLinac, a cloud based web application utilizing Geant4 Monte Carlo code, was used to model the Linac treatment head components. Particles were propagated through the lower portion of the treatment head using BEAMnrc. Dose distributions and spectral distributions were calculated using DOSXYZnrc and BEAMdp, respectively. For validation, 6 MV flattened and flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams were generated and compared to measurement for square fields, 10 and 40 cm wide and at d for diagonal profiles. Two low-Z targets were investigated: a 2.35 MeV carbon target and the proposed 2.50 MeV commercial imaging target for the TrueBeam platform. A 2.35 MeV carbon target was also simulated in a 2100EX Clinac using BEAMnrc. Contrast simulations were made by scoring the dose in the phosphor layer of an IDU20 aSi detector after propagating through a 4 or 20 cm thick phantom composed of water and ICRP bone.

Measured and modeled depth dose curves for 6 MV flattened and FFF beams agree within 1% for 98.3% of points at depths greater than 0.85 cm. Ninety three percent or greater of points analyzed for the diagonal profiles had a gamma value less than one for the criteria of 1.5 mm and 1.5%. The two low-Z target photon spectra produced in TrueBeam are harder than that from the carbon target in the Clinac. Percent dose at depth 10 cm is greater by 3.6% and 8.9%; the fraction of photons in the diagnostic energy range (25–150 keV) is lower by 10% and 28%; and contrasts are lower by factors of 1.1 and 1.4 (4 cm thick phantom) and 1.03 and 1.4 (20 cm thick phantom), for the TrueBeam 2.35 MV/carbon and commercial imaging beams, respectively.

VirtuaLinac is a promising new tool for Monte Carlo modeling of novel target designs. A significant spectral difference is observed between the low-Z target beam on the Clinac platform and the proposed imaging beam line on TrueBeam, with the former providing greater diagnostic energy content.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/1.4861818.html;jsessionid=3j84klkba1nui.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4861818&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A Monte Carlo investigation of low-Z target image quality generated in a linear accelerator using Varian's VirtuaLinaca)
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4861818
10.1118/1.4861818
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM