1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Dependency of EBT2 film calibration curve on postirradiation time
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.4862511
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4862511
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4862511

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) The C values and (b) the B values (fitted with the constant C), derived from the first fitting and the second fitting, respectively.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) The percentage differences between the delivered doses and the calculated film doses and (b) the total and fitting uncertainties of the mean in percentage calculated with Eq. (2) and Ref. 40 , for the fitting PITs of 2, 16, 71, 335, and 1007 h.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The fitting results of A(t) using Eq. (3) .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The calibration results of Eq. (4) for PITs at 2, 4, 16, 71, 335, and 1007 h.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The percent differences of the delivered doses and the film doses calculated through Eq. (4) for PITs of 3, 23, 503, and 1343 h.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The total and fitting uncertainties of the mean in percentage calculated through Eq. (5) for the chosen PITs of 2, 16, 71, 335, and 1007 h.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

The percent differences of the delivered doses and the calculated film doses for the “wrong PIT” test.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

The percent differences of the delivered doses and film doses calculated through Eq. (4) , based on the A(t) fitted with the five fitting PITs (one half of the PITs are shown).

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

The A and A calculated through Eqs. (2) and (3) , respectively, and their differences in percentage.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

The percentage differences between A and A, where A is generated through the five fitting PITs with Eq. (3) .

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

The percentage differences between A and A for the testing PITs of the second verification test, where the A were generated through the five fitting PITs with Eq. (3) .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4862511
2014-01-27
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Dependency of EBT2 film calibration curve on postirradiation time
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/2/10.1118/1.4862511
10.1118/1.4862511
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM