1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
Novel, full 3D scintillation dosimetry using a static plenoptic camera
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
    + View Affiliations - Hide Affiliations
    Affiliations:
    1 Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique and Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada and Département de radio-oncologie and CRCHU de Québec, CHU de Québec, 11 Côte du Palais, Québec, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada
    2 Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique and Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada; Département de radio-oncologie and CRCHU de Québec, CHU de Québec, 11 Côte du Palais, Québec, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada; and Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 0G4, Canada
    3 Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique and Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada and Département de radio-oncologie and CRCHU de Québec, CHU de Québec, 11 Côte du Palais, Québec, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada
    4 Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 94, Houston, Texas 77030
    5 Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique and Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada and Département de radio-oncologie and CRCHU de Québec, CHU de Québec, 11 Côte du Palais, Québec, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada
    a) Electronic mail: Louis.Archambault@mail.chuq.qc.ca
    Med. Phys. 41, 082101 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4884036
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/8/10.1118/1.4884036
1.
1. S. V. Spirou and C. S. Chui, “Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators,” Med. Phys. 21(7), 10311041 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597345
2.
2. J. Stein, T. Bortfeld, B. Dörschel, and W. Schlegel, “Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimation,” Radiother. Oncol. 32(2), 163173 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(94)90103-1
3.
3. C. X. Yu, “Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: An alternative to tomotherapy,” Phys. Med. Biol. 40(9), 14351449 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/40/9/004
4.
4. K. Otto, “Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc,” Med. Phys. 35(1), 310317 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2818738
5.
5. T. R. Mackie et al., “Tomotherapy: A new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy,” Med. Phys. 20(6), 17091719 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.596958
6.
6. G. A. Ezzell et al., “Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee,” Med. Phys. 30(8), 20892115 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1591194
7.
7. D. A. Low, J. M. Moran, J. F. Dempsey, L. Dong, and M. Oldham, “Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT,” Med. Phys. 38(3), 13131338 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3514120
8.
8. B. E. Nelms, H. Zhen, and W. A. Tomé, “Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors,” Med. Phys. 38(2), 10371044 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3544657
9.
9. M. J. Maryanski, J. C. Gore, R. P. Kennan, and R. J. Schulz, “NMR relaxation enhancement in gels polymerized and cross-linked by ionizing radiation: A new approach to 3D dosimetry by MRI,” Magn. Reson. Imaging 11(2), 253258 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(93)90030-H
10.
10. C. Baldock et al., “Polymer gel dosimetry,” Phys. Med. Biol. 55(5), R1R63 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/R01
11.
11. J. C. Gore, Y. S. Kang, and R. J. Schulz, “Measurement of radiation dose distributions by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol. 29(10), 11891197 (1984).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/29/10/002
12.
12. R. G. Kelly, K. J. Jordan, and J. J. Battista, “Optical CT reconstruction of 3D dose distributions using the ferrous-benzoic-xylenol (FBX) gel dosimeter,” Med. Phys. 25(9), 17411750 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598356
13.
13. J. Adamovics and M. J. Maryanski, “Characterisation of PRESAGE: A new 3-D radiochromic solid polymer dosemeter for ionising radiation,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 120(1-4), 107112 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci555
14.
14. P. Y. Guo, J. A. Adamovics, and M. Oldham, “Characterization of a new radiochromic three-dimensional dosimeter,” Med. Phys. 33(5), 13381345 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2192888
15.
15. A. S. Kirov et al., “The three-dimensional scintillation dosimetry method: Test for a 106Ru eye plaque applicator,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50(13), 30633081 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/13/007
16.
16. M. Goulet, L. Archambault, L. Beaulieu, and L. Gingras, “3D tomodosimetry using long scintillating fibers: A feasibility study,” Med. Phys. 40(10), 101703 (10pp.) (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4819937
17.
17. A. K. Glaser, S. C. Davis, D. M. McClatchy, R. Zhang, B. W. Pogue, and D. J. Gladstone, “Projection imaging of photon beams by the Čerenkov effect,” Med. Phys. 40(1), 012101 (14pp.) (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4770286
18.
18. S. Beddar et al., “Exploration of the potential of liquid scintillators for real-time 3D dosimetry of intensity modulated proton beams,” Med. Phys. 36(5), 17361743 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3117583
19.
19. F. Kroll, J. Pawelke, and L. Karsch, “Preliminary investigations on the determination of three-dimensional dose distributions using scintillator blocks and optical tomography,” Med. Phys. 40(8), 082104 (12pp.) (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4813898
20.
20. M. Goulet, L. Archambault, L. Beaulieu, and L. Gingras, “High resolution 2D dose measurement device based on a few long scintillating fibers and tomographic reconstruction,” Med. Phys. 39(8), 48404849 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4736526
21.
21. R. Ng, Digital Light Field Photography (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2006).
22.
22. M. Levoy, R. Ng, A. Adams, M. Footer, and M. Horowitz, “Light field microscopy,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers (ACM, New York, 2006), pp. 924934.
23.
23. T. Georgiev and A. Lumsdaine, “Focused plenoptic camera and rendering,” in Computer Graphics Forum (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010), pp. 19551968.
24.
24. C. Perwass and L. Wietzke, “Single lens 3D-camera with extended depth-of-field,” Proc. SPIE 8291, 829108 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.909882
25.
25. T. Georgiev and A. Lumsdaine, “The multi-focus plenoptic camera,” in SPIE Electronic Imaging (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2012).
26.
26. A. S. Beddar, “Plastic scintillation dosimetry and its application to radiotherapy,” Radiat. Meas. 41, S124S133 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.01.002
27.
27. M. Goulet, L. Gingras, and L. Beaulieu, “Real-time verification of multileaf collimator-driven radiotherapy using a novel optical attenuation-based fluence monitor,” Med. Phys. 38(3), 14591467 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3549766
28.
28. E. Hecht, Optics (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex, UK, 2008).
29.
29. L. Archambault, T. M. Briere, and S. Beddar, “Transient noise characterization and filtration in CCD cameras exposed to stray radiation from a medical linear accelerator,” Med. Phys. 35(10), 43424351 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2975147
30.
30. M. Wendling, R. J. W. Louwe, L. N. McDermott, J.-J. Sonke, M. van Herk, and B. J. Mijnheer, “Accurate two-dimensional IMRT verification using a back-projection EPID dosimetry method,” Med. Phys. 33(2), 259273 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2147744
31.
31. S. Devic et al., “Precise radiochromic film dosimetry using a flat-bed document scanner,” Med. Phys. 32(7), 22452253 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1929253
32.
32. J. F. Dempsey, H. E. Romeijn, J. G. Li, D. A. Low, and J. R. Palta, “A Fourier analysis of the dose grid resolution required for accurate IMRT fluence map optimization,” Med. Phys. 32(2), 380388 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1843354
33.
33. D. Matenine, S. Hissoiny, and P. Després, “GPU-accelerated few-view CT reconstruction using the OSC and TV techniques,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Meeting on Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (Fully three-dimensional image reconstruction in radiology and nuclear medicine, Germany 2011), pp. 7679.
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/8/10.1118/1.4884036
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/8/10.1118/1.4884036
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/8/10.1118/1.4884036
2014-07-16
2014-12-19

Abstract

Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of dynamic radiotherapy delivery would gain from being performed using a 3D dosimeter. However, 3D dosimeters, such as gels, have many disadvantages limiting to quality assurance, such as tedious read-out procedures and poor reproducibility. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a novel type of high resolution 3D dosimeter based on the real-time light acquisition of a plastic scintillator volume using a plenoptic camera. This dosimeter would allow for the QA of dynamic radiation therapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

A Raytrix R5 plenoptic camera was used to image a 10 × 10 × 10 cm3 EJ-260 plastic scintillator embedded inside an acrylic phantom at a rate of one acquisition per second. The scintillator volume was irradiated with both an IMRT and VMAT treatment plan on a Clinac iX linear accelerator. The 3D light distribution emitted by the scintillator volume was reconstructed at a 2 mm resolution in all dimensions by back-projecting the light collected by each pixel of the light-field camera using an iterative reconstruction algorithm. The latter was constrained by a beam's eye view projection of the incident dose acquired using the portal imager integrated with the linac and by physical consideration of the dose behavior as a function of depth in the phantom.

The absolute dose difference between the reconstructed 3D dose and the expected dose calculated using the treatment planning software Pinnacle3 was on average below 1.5% of the maximum dose for both integrated IMRT and VMAT deliveries, and below 3% for each individual IMRT incidences. Dose agreement between the reconstructed 3D dose and a radiochromic film acquisition in the same experimental phantom was on average within 2.1% and 1.2% of the maximum recorded dose for the IMRT and VMAT delivery, respectively.

Using plenoptic camera technology, the authors were able to perform millimeter resolution, water-equivalent dosimetry of an IMRT and VMAT plan over a whole 3D volume. Since no moving parts are required in the dosimeter, the incident dose distribution can be acquired as a function of time, thus enabling the validation of static and dynamic radiation delivery with photons, electrons, and heavier ions.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/41/8/1.4884036.html;jsessionid=3mgpccs7os99u.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/8/10.1118/1.4884036&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Novel, full 3D scintillation dosimetry using a static plenoptic camera
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/8/10.1118/1.4884036
10.1118/1.4884036
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM