Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892174
1.
1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2013,” CA. Cancer J. Clin. 63, 1130 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21166
2.
2. L. T. Niklason, B. T. Christian, L. E. Niklason, D. B. Kopans, D. E. Castleberry, B. Opsahl-Ong, C. E. Landberg, P. J. Slanetz, A. A. Giardino, and R. Moore, “Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging,” Radiology 205, 399406 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620
3.
3. G. Gennaro, A. Toledano, C. di Maggio, E. Baldan, E. Bezzon, M. La Grassa, L. Pescarini, I. Polico, A. Proietti, and A. Toffoli, “Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: A clinical performance study,” Eur. Radiol. 20, 15451553 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1699-5
4.
4. T. H. Helbich, “Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast,” Eur. J. Radiol. 34, 208219 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(00)00200-X
5.
5. S. Brennan, L. Liberman, D. D. Dershaw, and E. Morris, “Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 195, 510516 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3573
6.
6. Y. Hirooka, N. Aika, T. Ishisugi, M. Ohguri, C. Nagashima, S. Morishita, Y. Kato, and C. Fukuda, “Recent advances in ultrasound imaging of breast lesions,” Yonago Acta Med. 52, 115120 (2009).
7.
7. L. Chen, C. K. Abbey, A. Nosratieh, K. K. Lindfors, and J. M. Boone, “Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies,” Med. Phys. 39, 14351441 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3685462
8.
8. K. K. Lindfors, J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. Yang, A. L. Kwan, and D. F. Miller, “Dedicated breast CT: Initial clinical experience1,” Radiology 246, 725733 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2463070410
9.
9. J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. K. Lindfors, and J. A. Seibert, “Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose and omage quality evaluation1,” Radiology 221, 657667 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2213010334
10.
10. C.-J. Lai, C. C. Shaw, L. Chen, M. C. Altunbas, X. Liu, T. Han, T. Wang, W. T. Yang, G. J. Whitman, and S.-J. Tu, “Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: Effects of x-ray tube voltage and radiation dose,” Med. Phys. 34, 29953004 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2745921
11.
11. H. Q. Le, J. L. Ducote, and S. Molloi, “Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: Comparison to flat-panel detectors,” Med. Phys. 37, 12251236 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3312435
12.
12. W. A. Kalender, M. Beister, J. M. Boone, D. Kolditz, S. V. Vollmar, and M. C. Weigel, “High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: Concept and feasibility considerations,” Eur. Radiol. 22, 18 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2169-4
13.
13. C. Xu, M. Danielsson, S. Karlsson, C. Svensson, and H. Bornefalk, “Preliminary evaluation of a silicon strip detector for photon-counting spectral CT,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods, Phys. Res. A 677, 4551 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.02.034
14.
14. E. Roessl and R. Proksa, “K-edge imaging in x-ray computed tomography using multi-bin photon counting detectors,” Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 46794696 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/020
15.
15. J. Siewerdsen, L. Antonuk, Y. El-Mohri, J. Yorkston, W. Huang, J. Boudry, and I. Cunningham, “Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology,” Med. Phys. 24, 7189 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597919
16.
16. P. M. Shikhaliev and S. G. Fritz, “Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: Comparative evaluation for breast imaging application,” Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 19051930 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/7/001
17.
17. H. Bornefalk, C. Xu, C. Svensson, and M. Danielsson, “Design considerations to overcome cross talk in a photon counting silicon strip detector for computed tomography,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods, Phys. Res. A 621, 371378 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.04.071
18.
18. H. Bornefalk and M. Danielsson, “Photon-counting spectral computed tomography using silicon strip detectors: A feasibility study,” Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 19992022 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/7/014
19.
19. M. Weigel, S. V. Vollmar, and W. A. Kalender, “Spectral optimization for dedicated breast CT,” Med. Phys. 38, 114124 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3523599
20.
20. K. Taguchi and J. S. Iwanczyk, “Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging,” Med. Phys. 40, 119 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4820371
21.
21. G. F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement (Wiley, 2010).
22.
22. D. J. Tward and J. H. Siewerdsen, “Noise aliasing and the 3D NEQ of flat-panel cone-beam CT: Effect of 2D/3D apertures and sampling,” Med. Phys. 36, 38303843 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3166933
23.
23. D. J. Tward and J. H. Siewerdsen, “Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT,” Med. Phys. 35, 55105529 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3002414
24.
24. A. L. Kwan, J. M. Boone, K. Yang, and S.-Y. Huang, “Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner,” Med. Phys. 34, 275281 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2400830
25.
25. H. Cho, H. Kim, Y. Choi, S. Lee, H. Ryu, and Y. Lee, “The effects of photon flux on energy spectra and imaging characteristics in a photon-counting x-ray detector,” Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 48654879 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/14/4865
26.
26. J. T. Bushberg and J. M. Boone, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging (Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, 2011).
27.
27. I. S. Kyprianou, S. Rudin, D. R. Bednarek, and K. R. Hoffmann, “Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: Application to a new microangiographic system,” Med. Phys. 32, 613626 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1844151
28.
28. J. T. Dobbins III, E. Samei, N. T. Ranger, and Y. Chen, “Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum,” Med. Phys. 33, 14661475 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2188819
29.
29. K. Yang, A. L. Kwan, S.-Y. Huang, N. J. Packard, and J. M. Boone, “Noise power properties of a cone-beam CT system for breast cancer detection,” Med. Phys. 35, 53175327 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3002411
30.
30. K. L. Boedeker, V. N. Cooper, and M. F. McNitt-Gray, “Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: Part I. Measurement of noise power spectra and noise equivalent quanta,” Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 40274046 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/14/002
31.
31. P. M. Shikhaliev, “Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: a feasibility study,” Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 14751495 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/5/020
32.
32. T. G. Schmidt, “CT energy weighting in the presence of scatter and limited energy resolution,” Med. Phys. 37, 10561067 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3301615
33.
33.J. S. Iwanczyk, E. Nygard, O. Meirav, J. Arenson, W. C. Barber, N. E. Hartsough, N. Malakhov, and J. C. Wessel, “Photon counting energy dispersive detector arrays for x-ray imaging,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56, 535542 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2009.2013709
34.
34. W. C. Barber, E. Nygard, J. S. Iwanczyk, M. Zhang, E. C. Frey, B. M. Tsui, J. C. Wessel, N. Malakhov, G. Wawrzyniak, and N. E. Hartsough, paper presented at the SPIE Medical Imaging (unpublished).
35.
35. J. Baek, A. R. Pineda, and N. J. Pelc, “To bin or not to bin? The effect of CT system limiting resolution on noise and detectability,” Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 14331446 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/5/1433
36.
36. S. Yun, J. Tanguay, H. K. Kim, and I. A. Cunningham, “Cascaded-systems analyses and the detective quantum efficiency of single-Z x-ray detectors including photoelectric, coherent and incoherent interactions,” Med. Phys. 40, 041916 (17pp.) (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4794495
37.
37. R. Ballabriga, M. Campbell, E. Heijne, X. Llopart, and L. Tlustos, “The Medipix3 prototype, a pixel readout chip working in single photon counting mode with improved spectrometric performance,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54, 18241829 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2007.906163
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892174
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892174
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892174
2014-08-13
2016-09-26

Abstract

The possible clinical applications which can be performed using a newly developed detector depend on the detector's characteristic performance in a number of metrics including the dynamic range, resolution, uniformity, and stability. The authors have evaluated a prototype energy resolved fast photon counting x-ray detector based on a silicon (Si) strip sensor used in an edge-on geometry with an application specific integrated circuit to record the number of x-rays and their energies at high flux and fast frame rates. The investigated detector was integrated with a dedicated breast spectral computed tomography (CT) system to make use of the detector's high spatial and energy resolution and low noise performance under conditions suitable for clinical breast imaging. The aim of this article is to investigate the intrinsic characteristics of the detector, in terms of maximum output count rate, spatial and energy resolution, and noise performance of the imaging system.

The maximum output count rate was obtained with a 50 W x-ray tube with a maximum continuous output of 50 kVp at 1.0 mA. A109Cd source, with a characteristic x-ray peak at 22 keV from Ag, was used to measure the energy resolution of the detector. The axial plane modulation transfer function (MTF) was measured using a 67 m diameter tungsten wire. The two-dimensional (2D) noise power spectrum (NPS) was measured using flat field images and noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) were calculated using the MTF and NPS results. The image quality parameters were studied as a function of various radiation doses and reconstruction filters. The one-dimensional (1D) NPS was used to investigate the effect of electronic noise elimination by varying the minimum energy threshold.

A maximum output count rate of 100 million counts per second per square millimeter (cps/mm2) has been obtained (1 million cps per 100 × 100 m pixel). The electrical noise floor was less than 4 keV. The energy resolution measured with the 22 keV photons from a 109Cd source was less than 9%. A reduction of image noise was shown in all the spatial frequencies in 1D NPS as a result of the elimination of the electronic noise. The spatial resolution was measured just above 5 line pairs per mm (lp/mm) where 10% of MTF corresponded to 5.4 mm−1. The 2D NPS and NEQ shows a low noise floor and a linear dependence on dose. The reconstruction filter choice affected both of the MTF and NPS results, but had a weak effect on the NEQ.

The prototype energy resolved photon counting Si strip detector can offer superior imaging performance for dedicated breast CT as compared to a conventional energy-integrating detector due to its high output count rate, high spatial and energy resolution, and low noise characteristics, which are essential characteristics for spectral breast CT imaging.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/1.4892174.html;jsessionid=ECGc0YffSmDvNznT_0JM0loq.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892174&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=online.medphys.org/41/9/10.1118/1.4892174&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892174'
Right1,Right2,Right3,