Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892600
1.
1. G. R. Hammerstein, D. W. Miller, D. R. White, M. E. Masterson, H. Q. Woodard, and J. S. Laughlin, “Absorbed radiation dose in mammography,” Radiology 130, 485491 (1979).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/130.2.485
2.
2. D. R. Dance, “The Monte Carlo calculation of integral radiation dose in xeromammography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 25, 2537 (1980).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/25/1/003
3.
3. D. R. Dance, “Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose,” Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 12111219 (1990).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/002
4.
4. X. Wu, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography,” Radiology 179, 143148 (1991).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006265
5.
5. X. Wu, E. L. Gingold, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography,” Radiology 193, 8389 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090926
6.
6. J. M. Boone, “Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment,” Radiology 213, 2337 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923
7.
7. J. M. Boone, “Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data,” Med. Phys. 29, 869875 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1472499
8.
8. I. Sechopoulos, K. Bliznakova, X. Qin, B. Fei, and S. S. J. Feng, “Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry,” Med. Phys. 39, 50505059 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4737025
9.
9. I. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, S. Vedantham, C. D’Orsi, and A. Karellas, “Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast,” Med. Phys. 34, 221232 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2400836
10.
10. I. Sechopoulos and C. J. D’Orsi, “Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 9, 161171 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2887
11.
11. A. K. W. Ma, D. G. Darambara, A. Stewart, S. Gunn, and E. Bullard, “Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum + silver x-ray anode-filter combinations,” Med. Phys. 35, 52785289 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3002310
12.
12. D. R. Dance, K. C. Young, and R. E. van Engen, “Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: Factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols,” Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 453471 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/011
13.
13. I. Sechopoulos, “A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process,” Med. Phys. 40, 014301 (12pp.) (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4770279
14.
14. W. T. Sobol and X. Wu, “Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables,” Med. Phys. 24, 547554 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597937
15.
15. D. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, K. C. Young, J. R. Beckett, and C. J. Kotre, “Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 32253240 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308
16.
16. J. M. Boone, T. R. Fewell, and R. J. Jennings, “Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography,” Med. Phys. 24, 18631874 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598100
17.
17. S. Agostinelli et al., “Geant4 - A simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250303 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
18.
18. J. Allison et al., “Geant4 developments and applications,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270278 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2006.869826
19.
19. D. R. Dance, R. A. Hunt, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson, “Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 114, 359363 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch510
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892600
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892600
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892600
2014-08-21
2016-09-26

Abstract

The radiation dose involved in any medical imaging modality that uses ionizing radiation needs to be well understood by the medical physics and clinical community. This is especially true of screening modalities. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has recently been introduced into the clinic and is being used for screening for breast cancer in the general population. Therefore, it is important that the medical physics community have the required information to be able to understand, estimate, and communicate the radiation dose levels involved in breast tomosynthesis imaging. For this purpose, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 223 on Dosimetry in Tomosynthesis Imaging has prepared this report that discusses dosimetry in breast imaging in general, and describes a methodology and provides the data necessary to estimate mean breast glandular dose from a tomosynthesis acquisition. In an effort to maximize familiarity with the procedures and data provided in this Report, the methodology to perform the dose estimation in DBT is based as much as possible on that used in mammography dose estimation.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/1.4892600.html;jsessionid=a5leZA8mXiPMN3wBScGX8V8o.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892600&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=online.medphys.org/41/9/10.1118/1.4892600&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/9/10.1118/1.4892600'
Right1,Right2,Right3,