No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
“Hybrid gold” is the most appropriate open-access modality for journals like Medical Physics
4.S. W. Glover, A. Webb, and C. Gleghorn, “Open access publishing in the biomedical sciences: Could funding agencies accelerate the inevitable changes?,” Health Infor. Libr. J. 23, 197–202 (2006).
6.J.-C. Guédon, In Oldenburg’s Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers and the Control of Scientific Publishing (Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, 2001).
7.W. Crawford, Open Access: What You Need to Know (American Library Association, Chicago, IL, 2011).
8.A. Okerson and J. J. O’Donnell, Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal For Electronic Publishing (Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, 1995).
9.C. G. Orton, C. H. Marshall, and W. R. Hendee, “Results of publicly-funded scientific research should be immediately available without cost to the public,” Med. Phys. 32, 3231–3233 (2005).
10.P. Suber, Open Access (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2012).
11.B.-C. Björk, “The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles—A failed experiment?,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 1496–1504 (2012).
12.B.-C. Björk and D. Solomon, Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges (Welcome Trust, London, UK, 2014).
15.S. Harnad, (personal communication, 2014).
Article metrics loading...
There is no abstract available for this article.
Full text loading...
Most read this month