Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/42/3/10.1118/1.4908225
1.
1.C. Brace, “Thermal tumor ablation in clinical use,” Pulse, IEEE 2(5), 2838 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2011.942603
2.
2.M. Diakite et al., “Irreversible change in the T1 temperature dependence with thermal dose using the proton resonance frequency-T1 technique,” Magn. Reson. Med. 69, 11221130 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24322
3.
3.B. Bazrafshan et al., “Temperature imaging of laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) by MRI: Evaluation of different sequences in phantom,” Laser. Med. Sci. 29(1), 173183 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1306-5
4.
4.B. Bazrafshan et al., “A liver-mimicking MRI phantom for thermal ablation experiments,” Med. Phys. 38, 26742684 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3570577
5.
5.V. Rieke and K. Butts Pauly, “MR thermometry,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27, 376390 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri. 21265
6.
6.A. Kickhefel et al., “A pilot study for clinical feasibility of the near-harmonic 2D referenceless PRFS thermometry in liver under free breathing using MR-guided LITT ablation data,” Int. J. Hyperthermia 28, 250266 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2012.670834
7.
7.D. Schlesinger et al., “MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future,” Med. Phys. 40(8), 080901 (32 pp.) (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4811136
8.
8.C. Weidensteiner et al., “Stability of real-time MR temperature mapping in healthy and diseased human liver,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 19, 438446 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20019
9.
9.A. Kickhefel et al., “Correction of susceptibility-induced GRE phase shift for accurate PRFS thermometry proximal to cryoablation iceball,” Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 25, 2331 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-011-0277-4
10.
10.A. H. Chung et al., “Optimization of spoiled gradient-echo phase imaging for in vivo localization of a focused ultrasound beam,” Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 745752 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910360513
11.
11.J. D. Poorter et al., “Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency (PRF) method: In vivo results in human muscle,” Magn. Reson. Med. 33, 7481 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910330111
12.
12.J. C. Hindman, “Proton resonance shift of water in the gas and liquid states,” J. Chem. Phys. 44, 45824592 (1966).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1726676
13.
13.F. Maier et al., “Velocity navigator for motion compensated thermometry,” Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 25, 1522 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-011-0245-z
14.
14.S. M. Sprinkhuizen et al., “Temperature dependence of the magnetic volume susceptibility of human breast fat tissue: An NMR study,” Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 25, 3339 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-011-0250-2
15.
15.M. N. Streicher et al., “Effects of air susceptibility on proton resonance frequency MR thermometry,” Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys., Biol. Med. 25, 4147 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-011-0249-816
16.
16.P. Saccomandi, E. Schena, and S. Silvestri, “Techniques for temperature monitoring during laser-induced thermotherapy: An overview,” Int. J. Hyperthermia 29(7), 609619 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2013.832411
17.
17.F. Fani et al., “CT-based thermometry: An overview,” Int. J. Hyperthermia 30(4), 219227 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2014.92222118
18.
18.Y. Eryaman, Y. Öner, and E. Atalar, “Design of internal MRI coils using ultimate intrinsic SNR,” Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 22, 221228 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-009-0167-1
19.
19.D. I. Hoult and P. C. Lauterbur, “The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples,” J. Magn. Reson. 1969(34), 425433 (1979).
20.
20.R. R. A. Syms et al., “Thin-film detector system for internal magnetic resonance imaging,” Sens. Actuators, A 163, 1524 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2010.05.017
21.
21.M. Rata et al., “Endoluminal ultrasound applicator with an integrated RF coil for high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity contact ultrasound thermotherapy,” Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 65496567 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/22/017
22.
22.N. A. Volland et al., “Initial feasibility testing of limited field of view magnetic resonance thermometry using a local cardiac radiofrequency coil,” Magn. Reson. Med. 70, 9941004 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24534
23.
23.I. P. Wharton et al., “Design and development of a prototype endocavitary probe for high-intensity focused ultrasound delivery with integrated magnetic resonance imaging,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 25, 548556 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20833
24.
24.E. M. Kardoulaki et al., “MR-thermometry with a flexible micro-coil during a Nd:YAG laser ablation on a gel phantom,” in ISMRM-ESMRMB Joint Annual Meeting (ISMRM, Milan, Italy, 2014), pp. 1016.
25.
25.H. C. Van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1957).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910360513
26.
26.J. Schmitt and G. Kumar, “Turbulent nature of refractive-index variations in biological tissue,” Opt. Lett. 21, 13101312 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.21.001310
27.
27.Z. Wang, “Tissue refractive index as marker of disease,” J. Biomed. Opt. 16(11), 116017 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.21.001310
28.
28.F. Asllanaj, “Radiative transfer equation for predicting light propagation in biological media: Comparison of a modified finite volume method, the Monte Carlo technique, and an exact analytical solution,” J. Biomed. Opt. 19(1), 1500215010 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.015002
29.
29.A. Doronin, C. Macdonald, and I. Meglinski, “Propagation of coherent polarized light in turbid highly scattering medium,” J. Biomed. Opt. 19(2), 025005 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.015002
30.
30.R. French et al., “Optical properties of polymeric materials for concentrator photovoltaic systems,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 20772086 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2011.02.025
31.
31.P. Dyer, M. Pervolaraki, and T. Lippert, “Experimental studies and thermal modelling of 1064-and 532-nm Nd: YVO4 micro-laser ablation of polyimide,” Appl. Phys. A 80, 529536 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-3085-0
32.
32.K. V. Larin, I. V. Larina, and R. O. Esenaliev, “Monitoring of tissue coagulation during thermotherapy using optoacoustic technique,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, 26452653 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/38/15/017
33.
33.S. G. Nour et al., “MRI-guided and monitored laser ablation for Renal Malignancy: A step toward moving interventional MRI technology to mainstream usage?,” in ISMRM-ESMRMB Joint Annual Meeting (ISMRM, Milan, Italy, 2014), pp. 1016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/38/15/017
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/42/3/10.1118/1.4908225
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/42/3/10.1118/1.4908225
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/42/3/10.1118/1.4908225
2015-02-26
2016-09-27

Abstract

Flexible microcoils integrated with ablation catheters can improve the temperature accuracy during local MR-thermometry in Nd:YAG laser interstitial thermal therapies. Here, the authors are concerned with obtaining a preliminary confirmation of the clinical utility of the modified catheter. They investigate whether the thin-film substrate and copper tracks of the printed coil inductor affect the symmetry of the thermal profile, and hence of the lesion produced.

Transmission spectroscopy in the near infrared was performed to test for the attenuation at 1064 nm through the 25 μm thick Kapton substrate of the microcoil. The radial transmission profile of an infrared high-power, light emitting diode with >80% normalized power at 1064 nm was measured through a cross section of the modified applicator to assess the impact of the copper inductor on the optical profile. The measurements were performed in air, as well as with the applicator surrounded by two types of scattering media; crystals of NaCl and a layer of liver-mimicking gel phantom. A numerical model based on Huygens–Fresnel principle and finite element simulations, using a commercially available package (COMSOL Multiphysics), were employed to compare with the optical measurements. The impact of the modified optical profile on the thermal symmetry was assessed by examining the high resolution microcoil derived thermal maps from a Nd:YAG laser ablation performed on a liver-mimicking gel phantom.

Less than 30% attenuation through the Kapton film was verified. Shadowing behind the copper tracks was observed in air and the measured radial irradiation correlated well with the diffraction pattern calculated numerically using the Huygens–Fresnel principle. Both optical experiments and simulations, demonstrate that shadowing is mitigated by the scattering properties of a turbid medium. The microcoil derived thermal maps at the end of a Nd:YAG laser ablation performed on a gel phantom in a 3 T scanner confirm that the modified irradiation pattern does not disrupt the thermal symmetry, even though, unlike tissue, the gel is minimally scattering.

The results from this initial assessment indicate that microcoils can be safely integrated with ablation catheters and ensure that the complete necrosis of the liver tumor can still be achieved.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/42/3/1.4908225.html;jsessionid=F2rvbLwyo4QnAR6NHG-5HRMg.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/42/3/10.1118/1.4908225&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=online.medphys.org/42/3/10.1118/1.4908225&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/42/3/10.1118/1.4908225'
Right1,Right2,Right3,