Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.IAEA, “The use and management of sealed radioactive sources,” in 56th IAEA General Conference Documents (IAEA, Vienna, 2012), NTR 2012 Supplement
2.P. J. Allisy, D. T. Burns, and P. Andreo, “International framework of traceability for radiation dosimetry quantities,” Metrologia 46, S1S8 (2009).
3.H. Benmakhlouf and P. Andreo, “Ten years after: Impact of recent research in photon and electron beam dosimetry in the IAEA TRS-398 code of practice,” in Proceedings of an International Symposium on Standards, Applications and Quality Assurance in Medical Radiation Dosimetry (IDOS), Vienna (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2011), pp. 139152.
4.P. Andreo, J. Wulff, D. T. Burns, and H. Palmans, “Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: Resolution of an apparent conundrum when 60Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams,” Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 65936621 (2013).
5.R. Alfonso, P. Andreo, R. Capote, M. S. Huq, W. Kilby, P. Kjäll, T. R. Mackie, K. Rosser, W. Ullrich, and S. Vatnitsky, “A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields,” Med. Phys. 35, 51795186 (2009).
6.D. J. Butler, G. Ramanathan, C. Oliver, A. Cole, J. Lye, P. D. Harty, T. Wright, D. J. Webb, and D. S. Followill, “Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia,” Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 37, 753761 (2014).
7.M. R. McEwen, “Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose kQ factors in megavoltage photon beams,” Med. Phys. 37, 21792193 (2010).
8.B. R. Muir and D. W. O. Rogers, “Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor,” Med. Phys. 37, 59395950 (2010).
9.G. Xiong and D. W. O. Rogers, “Relationship between %dd(10)x and stopping-power ratios for flattening filter free accelerators: A Monte Carlo study,” Med. Phys. 35, 21042109 (2008).
10.T. Wright, J. Lye, G. Ramanathan, P. D. Harty, C. Oliver, D. V. Webb, and D. J. Butler, “Direct calibration in megavoltage photon beams using Monte Carlo conversion factor: Validation and clinical implications,” Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 883904 (2015).
11.M. R. McEwen, L. Dewerd, G. Ibbott, D. Followill, D. W. O. Rogers, S. Seltzer, and J. Seuntjens, “Addendum to the AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams,” Med. Phys. 41, 041501(20pp.) (2014).
12.P. Almond, P. J. Biggs, B. M. Coursey, W. F. Hanson, M. S. Huq, R. Nath, and D. W. O. Rogers, “AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams,” Med. Phys. 26, 18471870 (1999).
13.IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), “Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy,” IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 398 (IAEA, Vienna, 2000).
14.S. Duane and M. Simon, Experimental determination of the quality-dependent correction factors,kQ, for ionisation chambers of type NE 2561 and NE 2611, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, 2008,
15.B. Muir, M. R. Mcewen, and D. W. O. Rogers, “Monte Carlo calculations of the beam quality conversion factor, kQ, for cylindrical ionization chambers: Comparison with published data,” Med. Phys. 38, 46004609 (2011).
16.National Research Council, NRC Activities and Publications, Report to the CCRI(I) Meeting, BIPM, March 2013, 2011-2013,
17.S. Picard, D. T. Burns, P. Roger, S. Duane, G. A. Bass, J. W. Manning, and D. R. Shipley, “Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K6 of the standards for absorbed dose to water at 5 g cm−2 and 7 g cm−2 of the NPL, United Kingdom and the BIPM in accelerator photon beams,” Metrologia 52, 06010 (27pp.) (2015).
18.A. H. L. Aalbers et al., “Code of practice for the absorbed dose determination in high energy photon and electron beams,” NCS Report 18, 2012,
19.B. R. Muir, “Ion chamber absorbed dose calibration coefficients, ND,w, measured at ADCLs: Distribution analysis and stability,” Med. Phys. 42, 15461554 (2015).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



There is no abstract available for this article.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd