No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Calibration of radiotherapy ionization chambers using Co-60 is outdated and should be replaced by direct calibration in linear accelerator beams
3.H. Benmakhlouf and P. Andreo, “Ten years after: Impact of recent research in photon and electron beam dosimetry in the IAEA TRS-398 code of practice,” in Proceedings of an International Symposium on Standards, Applications and Quality Assurance in Medical Radiation Dosimetry (IDOS), Vienna (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2011), pp. 139–152.
4.P. Andreo, J. Wulff, D. T. Burns, and H. Palmans, “Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: Resolution of an apparent conundrum when 60Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams,” Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 6593–6621 (2013).
5.R. Alfonso, P. Andreo, R. Capote, M. S. Huq, W. Kilby, P. Kjäll, T. R. Mackie, K. Rosser, W. Ullrich, and S. Vatnitsky, “A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields,” Med. Phys. 35, 5179–5186 (2009).
6.D. J. Butler, G. Ramanathan, C. Oliver, A. Cole, J. Lye, P. D. Harty, T. Wright, D. J. Webb, and D. S. Followill, “Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia,” Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 37, 753–761 (2014).
7.M. R. McEwen, “Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose kQ factors in megavoltage photon beams,” Med. Phys. 37, 2179–2193 (2010).
8.B. R. Muir and D. W. O. Rogers, “Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor,” Med. Phys. 37, 5939–5950 (2010).
9.G. Xiong and D. W. O. Rogers, “Relationship between %dd(10)x and stopping-power ratios for flattening filter free accelerators: A Monte Carlo study,” Med. Phys. 35, 2104–2109 (2008).
10.T. Wright, J. Lye, G. Ramanathan, P. D. Harty, C. Oliver, D. V. Webb, and D. J. Butler, “Direct calibration in megavoltage photon beams using Monte Carlo conversion factor: Validation and clinical implications,” Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 883–904 (2015).
11.M. R. McEwen, L. Dewerd, G. Ibbott, D. Followill, D. W. O. Rogers, S. Seltzer, and J. Seuntjens, “Addendum to the AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams,” Med. Phys. 41, 041501(20pp.) (2014).
12.P. Almond, P. J. Biggs, B. M. Coursey, W. F. Hanson, M. S. Huq, R. Nath, and D. W. O. Rogers, “AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams,” Med. Phys. 26, 1847–1870 (1999).
13.IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), “Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy,” IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 398 (IAEA, Vienna, 2000).
15.B. Muir, M. R. Mcewen, and D. W. O. Rogers, “Monte Carlo calculations of the beam quality conversion factor, kQ, for cylindrical ionization chambers: Comparison with published data,” Med. Phys. 38, 4600–4609 (2011).
17.S. Picard, D. T. Burns, P. Roger, S. Duane, G. A. Bass, J. W. Manning, and D. R. Shipley, “Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K6 of the standards for absorbed dose to water at 5 g cm−2 and 7 g cm−2 of the NPL, United Kingdom and the BIPM in accelerator photon beams,” Metrologia 52, 06010 (27pp.) (2015).
19.B. R. Muir, “Ion chamber absorbed dose calibration coefficients, ND,w, measured at ADCLs: Distribution analysis and stability,” Med. Phys. 42, 1546–1554 (2015).
Article metrics loading...
There is no abstract available for this article.
Full text loading...
Most read this month