Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/43/7/10.1118/1.4953451
1.
R. A. Pauwels, A. S. Buist, P. M. Calverley, C. R. Jenkins, S. S. Hurd, and GOLD Scientific Committee, “Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 163, 12561276 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2101039
2.
C. D. Mathers and D. Loncar, “Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030,” PLoS Med. 3(11), e442 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442
3.
D. E. O’Donnell and K. A. Webb, “Exertional breathlessness in patients with chronic airflow limitation. The role of lung hyperinflation,” Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 148, 13511357 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1351
4.
D. A. Mahler, “Mechanisms and measurement of dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 3, 234238 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/pats.200509-103SF
5.
M. G. Cosio and A. Guerassimov, “Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Inflammation of small airways and lung parenchyma,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 160, S21S25 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.supplement_1.7
6.
P. R. Burgel, “The role of small airways in obstructive airway diseases,” Eur. Respir. Rev. 20, 2333 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09059180.00010410
7.
D. O’Donnell and P. Laveneziana, “Physiology and consequences of lung hyperinflation in COPD,” Eur. Respir. Rev. 15, 6167 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09059180.00010002
8.
N. Pettiaux, M. Cassart, M. Paiva, and M. Estenne, “Three-dimensional reconstruction of human diaphragm with the use of spiral computed tomography,” J. Appl. Physiol. 82, 9981002 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.365939
9.
R. M. Rangayyan, R. H. Vu, and G. S. Boag, “Automatic delineation of the diaphragm in computed tomographic images,” J. Digital Imaging 21(Suppl. 1), S134S147 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9091-y
10.
J. Bae, N. Kim, S. M. Lee, J. B. Seo, and H. C. Kim, “Thoracic cavity segmentation algorithm using multiorgan extraction and surface fitting in volumetric CT,” Med. Phys. 41, 041908 (9pp.) (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4866836
11.
B. Van Ginneken, T. Heimann, and M. Styner, “3D segmentation in the clinic: A grand challenge,” in MICCAI Workshop on 3D Segmentation in the Clinic: A Grand Challenge 1 (2007), pp. 715.
12.
W. E. Lorensen and H. E. Cline, “Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm,” ACM SIGGRAPH Comput. Graphics 21, 163169 (1987).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/37402.37422
13.
Y. Boykov and G. Funka-Lea, “Graph cuts and efficient N-D image segmentation,” Int. J. Comput. Vision 70, 109131 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-7934-5
14.
N. R. Draper and H. Smith, Applied Regression Analysis, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, NY, 1998), p. 567.
15.
P. J. Huber, “Robust estimation of a location parameter,” Ann. Math. Stat. 35, 73101 (1964).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177703732
16.
T. J. Willmore, An Introduction to Differential Geometry (Dover, Mineola, New York, NY, 2012), p. 98.
17.
C. A. C. Ottenheijm, L. M. A. Heunks, and R. P. N. Dekhuijzen, “Diaphragm adaptations in patients with COPD,” Respir. Res. 9:12, 1–14 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-12
18.
A. J. Moore, A. Stubbings, E. B. Swallow, M. Dusmet, P. Goldstraw, R. Porcher, J. Moxham, M. I. Polkey, and M. A. Ferenczi, “Passive properties of the diaphragm in COPD,” J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 14001405 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01614.2005
19.
M. Ruel, J. Deslauriers, and F. Maltais, “The diaphragm in emphysema,” Chest Surg. Clin. North Am. 8, 381399 (1998).
20.
D. K. McKenzie, J. E. Butler, and S. C. Gandevia, “Respiratory muscle function and activation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” J. Applied Physiol. 107, 621629 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00163.2009
21.
E. Promayon and P. Baconnier, “A 3D discrete model of the diaphragm and human trunk,” ESAIM: Proc. 23, 6677 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/proc:082305
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/43/7/10.1118/1.4953451
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/43/7/10.1118/1.4953451
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/43/7/10.1118/1.4953451
2016-06-16
2016-09-26

Abstract

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diaphragm function may deteriorate due to reduced muscle fiber length. Quantitative analysis of the morphology of the diaphragm is therefore important. In the authors current study, they propose a diaphragm segmentation method for COPD patients that uses volumetric chest computed tomography (CT) data, and they provide a quantitative analysis of the diaphragmatic dimensions.

Volumetric CT data were obtained from 30 COPD patients and 10 normal control patients using a 16-row multidetector CT scanner (Siemens Sensation 16) with 0.75-mm collimation. Diaphragm segmentation using 3D ray projections on the lower surface of the lungs was performed to identify the draft diaphragmatic lung surface, which was modeled using quadratic 3D surface fitting and robust regression in order to minimize the effects of segmentation error and parameterize diaphragm morphology. This result was visually evaluated by an expert thoracic radiologist. To take into consideration the shape features of the diaphragm, several quantification parameters—including the shape index on the apex (SIA) (which was computed using gradient set to 0), principal curvatures on the apex on the fitted diaphragm surface (CA), the height between the apex and the base plane (H), the diaphragm lengths along the -, -, and -axes (XL, YL, ZL), quadratic-fitted diaphragm lengths on the -axis (FZL), average curvature (C), and surface area (SA)—were measured using in-house software and compared with the pulmonary function test (PFT) results.

The overall accuracy of the combined segmentation method was 97.22% ± 4.44% while the visual accuracy of the models for the segmented diaphragms was 95.28% ± 2.52% (mean ± SD). The quantitative parameters, including SIA, CA, H, XL, YL, ZL, FZL, C, and SA were 0.85 ± 0.05 (mm−1), 0.01 ± 0.00 (mm−1), 17.93 ± 10.78 (mm), 129.80 ± 11.66 (mm), 163.19 ± 13.45 (mm), 71.27 ± 17.52 (mm), 61.59 ± 16.98 (mm), 0.01 ± 0.00 (mm−1), and 34 380.75 ± 6680.06 (mm2), respectively. Several parameters were correlated with the PFT parameters.

The authors propose an automatic method for quantitatively evaluating the morphological parameters of the diaphragm on volumetric chest CT in COPD patients. By measuring not only the conventional length and surface area but also the shape features of the diaphragm using quadratic 3D surface modeling, the proposed method is especially useful for quantifying diaphragm characteristics. Their method may be useful for assessing morphological diaphragmatic changes in COPD patients.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/43/7/1.4953451.html;jsessionid=J7LDJg_KC4Wle73d00KaBJbd.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/43/7/10.1118/1.4953451&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=online.medphys.org/43/7/10.1118/1.4953451&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/43/7/10.1118/1.4953451'
Right1,Right2,Right3,