No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Student understanding of symmetry and Gauss’s law of electricity
1.A. Van Heuvelen, “Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 59, 891 (1991);
2.D. E. Meltzer and K. Manivannan, “Transforming the lecture hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 70(6), 639–654 (2002).
3.E. F. Redish, J. M. Saul, and R. N. Steinberg, “On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 65, 45–54 (1997).
4.D. Zollman, “Millikan lecture 1995: Do they just sit there? Reflections on helping students learn physics,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 64(2), 113–119 (1996).
5.M. T. H. Chi, “Thinking aloud,” in The Think Aloud Method, edited by M. W. van Someren, Y. F. Barnard, and J. A. C. Sandberg (Academic Press, London, 1994), Chap. 1.
6.D. Maloney, T. O’Kuma, C. Hieggelke, and A. V. Heuvelen, “Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 69, S12–S23 (2001).
7.L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, “Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 60, 994–1003 (1992);
7.P. S. Shaffer and L. C. McDermott, “Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of an instructional strategy,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 60, 1003–1013 (1992).
8.P. Engelhard and R. Beichner, “Students’ understanding of direct current electrical circuits,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 72, 98–113 (2004).
9.S. Rainson, G. Transtromer, and L. Viennot, “Students’ understanding of superposition of electric fields,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 62(11), 1026–1032 (1994).
12.L. C. McDermott, P. S. Shaffer, and the Physics Education Group, University of Washington Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice Hall, NJ, 2002).
13.D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer, “Force Concept Inventory,” Phys. Teach.0031-921X 30, 141–158 (1992).
14.R. Thornton and D. Sokoloff, “Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 66, 338–352 (1998).
16.G. Aubrecht and J. Aubrecht, “Constructing objective tests,” Am. J. Phys.0002-9505 51, 613–620 (1983);
16.A. J. Nitko, Educational Assessments of Students, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall/Merrill, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996).
17.B. Bloom, G. Madaus, and J. Hastings, Evaluation to Improve Learning (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month