1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The conversion of phase to amplitude fluctuations of a light beam by an optical cavity
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1119/1.2937903
/content/aapt/journal/ajp/76/10/10.1119/1.2937903
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapt/journal/ajp/76/10/10.1119/1.2937903
View: Figures

Figures

Image of Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

(a) In the Mach-Zehnder interferometer the relative phase between the two possible paths determines the intensity difference between the two output ports. (b) Homodyne detection is performed by interfering in a balanced beam splitter (BS 50/50) the field to be measured (dotted arrow) and a strong local oscillator field (LO, solid arrow). The subtraction of the photocurrents gives information about the phase fluctuations of the target beam when the mean relative phase is .

Image of Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Representation of the light field in the complex plane and its fluctuations. The vector is the complex field mean amplitude . The decomposition of the fluctuation in the direction of the mean value and in the orthogonal one defines the amplitude and phase quadratures, respectively. In the time domain a field presenting the amplitude fluctuations would resemble the inset (a), and the phase fluctuations would correspond to (b).

Image of Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Linear optical cavity with coupling mirror showing the reflectivity and the output mirror with reflectivity . The reflected field amplitude is the sum of the incident amplitude with the vacuum coupled by the output mirror and losses.

Image of Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Squared modulus (continuous line) and phase (dashed line) of as functions of the carrier-cavity detuning parameter relative to the cavity bandwidth. The numerical values and were used.

Image of Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Representation of the light field frequency components, carrier and sidebands (upper curve), and cavity resonance transmission profile (lower curve). The cavity is either resonant with (a) one sideband or (b) the carrier.

Image of Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Noise ellipse representation in the complex plane (shaded ellipse). The dotted circle represents the shot noise. The ellipse size compared to the mean value is exaggerated for ease of visualization.

Image of Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

The rotation angle between the field carrier and the noise ellipse introduced by the cavity as a function of for .

Image of Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.

Phase rotation of the noise ellipse as a function of the carrier-cavity detuning parameter relative to the cavity bandwidth. The central curve is the reflected beam amplitude noise [Eq. (25)], and the frames around it represent, for the corresponding numbered detuning, the reflected field in the complex plane (see Fig. 6). For , , , and .

Image of Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.

Detunings for which has zero derivatives as a function of the analysis frequency . Each symbol represents a different zero derivative point. At a single detuning with zero derivative (open circles) gives rise to three such points as increases, because the complete conversion of phase to amplitude noise begins to be possible (triangles). The gray curves help to visualize the asymptotic behavior. Losses are assumed to be zero .

Image of Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.

Schematic of the experimental setup required to perform a classroom demonstration of the effect. PM: phase modulator.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapt/journal/ajp/76/10/10.1119/1.2937903
2008-10-01
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: The conversion of phase to amplitude fluctuations of a light beam by an optical cavity
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapt/journal/ajp/76/10/10.1119/1.2937903
10.1119/1.2937903
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM