No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A model-based view of physics for computational activities in the introductory physics course
, “Approaches to classroom-based computational science
,” in Recreating the Revolution, Proceedings of the 15th Annual National Educational Computing Conference
, MA, 1994
), available at /www.eric.ed.gov
, search reference ED396683, pp. 217
5.J. D. Gobert, “Leveraging technology and cognitive theory on visualization to promote students’ science learning and literacy,” in Visualization in Science Education, edited by J. K. Gilbert (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 73–90.
6.M. Black, Models and Metaphors (Cornell U.P., Ithaca, 1962).
7.M. Bunge, Philosophy of Physics (Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston, 1973).
8.F. Suppe, The Structure of Scientific Theories (University of Illinois, Urbana, 1977), 2nd ed.;
8.B. von Fraassen, The Scientific Image (Clarendon, Oxford, 1980);
8.R. N. Giere, Explaining Science, A Cognitive Approach (University of Chicago, Chicago, 1988).
9.M. Morrison and M. Morgan, “Models as mediating instruments,” in Models as Mediators, edited by M. Morrison and M. Morgan (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1999), pp. 10–37.
10.N. Cartwright, The Dappled World (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1999);
10.R. I. G. Hughes, “Models and representations,” Philos. Sci. 67, S325–S336 (1997).
11.I. T. Koponen, “Models and modeling in physics education: A critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions,” Sci. Educ. 16, 751–773 (2007).
12.I. M. Greca and M. A. Moreira, “Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22(1), 1–11 (2000);
12.I. M. Greca and M. A. Moreira, “Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics,” Sci. Educ. 86(1), 106–121 (2002).
13.K. M. Darling, “The complete Duhemian underdetermination argument: Scientific language and practice,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci 33, 511–533 (2002).
14.D. P. Portides, “The relation between idealization and approximation in scientific model construction,” Sci. Educ. 16, 699–724 (2007).
15.The notion of the measurand seems to be of importance here. Both the theoretical model and the experimental model need to make predictions about the same attribute of the particular physical system under consideration.
17.D. Norman, “Some observations on mental models,” in Mental Models, edited by D. Gentner and A. Stevens (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1983).
18.A. G. Harrison and D. F. Treagust, “A typology of school science models,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22(9), 1011–1026 (2000).
19.A. van Heuvelen, “Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies,” Am. J. Phys. 59(10), 891–897 (1991);
19.P. B. Kohl and N. D. Finkelstein, “Effects of representation on students solving physics problems: A fine-grained characterization,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 010106–1 (2006).
21.I. A. Halloun, “Mediated modeling in science education,” Sci. Educ. 16, 653–697 (2007).
22.J. D. Gobert and B. C. Buckley, “Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22(9), 891–894 (2000).
23.J. H. Mathewson, “Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators,” Sci. Educ. 83, 33–54 (1999).
24.R. L. Kung and C. J. Linder, “Improving students’ self-assessment of numerical analysis projects,” Comput. Sci. Eng. 9(4), 92–95 (2007);
24.P. B. Kohl and N. D. Finkelstein, “Student representational competence and self-assessment when solving physics problems,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010104–1(2005).
25.R. Chabay and B. Sherwood, Matter & Interactions (Wiley, New York, 2007), 2nd ed.
30.The computational approach of Ref. 25 makes use of the modified Euler algorithm in Alan Cromer, “Stable solutions using the Euler approximation,” Am. J. Phys. 49(5), 455–459 (1981).
31.M. D. Gall, W. R. Borg, and J. P. Gall, Educational Research: An Introduction (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 2006), 8th ed., pp. 227–297.
32.J. H. Mathewson, “The visual core of science: Definition and applications to education,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 27(5), 529–548 (2005).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month