No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Listening to student conversations during clicker questions: What you have not heard might surprise you!
1.E. Judson, “Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls,” J. Computers Mathematics Science Teaching 21 (2), 167–181 (2002).
2.J. Stowell and J. Nelson, “Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning and emotion,” Teaching of Psychology 34 (4), 253–258 (2007).
3.E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991).
5.D. Meltzer and K. Manivannan, “Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture,” Am. J. Phys. 70 (6), 639–654 (2002).
7.S. Rao and S. DiCarlo, “Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes,” Advanced Physiology Educ. 24, 51–55 (2000).
8.C. Turpen and N. Finkelstein, “Not all interactive engagement is the same: Variations in physics professors’ implementation of Peer Instruction,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 5 (2), 020101-1–18 (2009).
10.I. Beatty, W. Gerace, W. Loenard, and R. Dufresne, “Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching,” Am. J. Phys. 74 (1), 31–39 (2006).
11.S. Willoughby and E. Gustafson, “Technology talks: Clickers and grading incentive in the large lecture hall,” Am. J. Phys. 77 (2), 180–183 (2009).
12.M. James, F. Barbieri, and P. Garcia, “What are they talking about? Lessons learned from a study of peer instruction,” Astron. Educ. Rev. 7 (1), 37–43 (2008).
15.The clicker system used by Instructors 2 and 3 was manufactured by e-Instruction. Instructor 1 used the i-Clicker system.
16.The F test is a test for the statistical significance of an observed difference between the means of two samples. The “-value” is the probability that a statistical finding occurred by chance.
17.A. Shamir, M. Zion, and O. Spector, “Peer tutoring, metacognitive processes and multimedia problem-based learning: The effect of mediation training on critical thinking,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 17, 384–398 (2008).
19.J. Barell, Teaching for Thoughtfulness: Classroom Strategies To Enhance Intellectual Development, 2nd ed. (Longman, White Plains, 1995).
20.L. Ding, N. Reay, A. Lee, and L. Bao, “Are we asking the right questions? Validating clicker question sequences by student interviews,” Am. J. Phys. 77 (7), 643–650 (2009).
23.E. Bardar, E. Prather, K. Brecher, and T. Slater, “Development and validation of the light and spectroscopy concept inventory,” Astron. Educ. Rev. 5 (2), 103–113 (2006).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month