No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
4. E Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997).
6. R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys. 66, 64–74 (1998).
7.The order of magnitude of the FCI data at Arizona State University is at least 50000 cases. Through the Interactive Learning Toolkit test module, the Mazur group at Harvard University has close to 10000 cases. There are several hundreds of undocumented FCI administrations each semester worldwide. We would not be surprised if the order of magnitude of FCI administrations was close to one million since its initial publication in 1992.
8. R. P. McDonald, Test Theory: A Unified Treatment (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1999).
9. R. K. Thornton and D. R. Sokoloff, “Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula,” Am. J. Phys. 66, 338–351 (1998).
10. R. K. Thornton, D. Kuhl, K. Cummings, and J. Marx, “Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory,” Phys. Rev. STPhys. Educ. Res. 5, 010105 (2009).
11. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Cronbach’s alpha,” Br. Med. J. 314, 572 (1997).
12. R. C. Sprinthall, Basic Statistical Analysis 7th ed. (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 2003). Also see <en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-test>.
13. D. Hammer, A. Elby, R. E. Scherr, and E. F. Redish, “Resources, framing, and transfer,” in Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, edited by J. Mestre (Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, 2005)
14. E. F. Redish, “A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking,” in Proceedings of the 2004 Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI, Italian Physical Society, edited by E. Redish, C. Tarsitani, and M. Vicentini, pp. 1–63.
15. M. S. Sabella and E. F. Redish, “Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving,” Am. J. Phys. 75, 1017–1029 (2007).
17. D. Hestenes and I. Halloun, “Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to March 1995 Critique by Huffman and Heller,” Phys. Teach. 33, 502–504 (1995).
18. H. Dedic, S. Rosenfield, and N. Lasry, “Are all wrong FCI answers equivalent?,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1289, 125–128 (2010).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month