No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Preparing tutorial and recitation instructors: A pedagogical approach to focusing attention on content and student reasoning
2. R. M. Goertzen et al., “Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 010105 (2010).
3. E. F. Redish, Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003), pp. 142–169.
4. M. C. Wittmann and J. R. Thompson, “Integrated approaches in physics education: A graduate level course in physics, pedagogy, and education research,” Am. J. Phys. 76, 677–683 (2008).
6. A. E. Austin, M. R. Connolly, and C. L. Colbeck, “Strategies for preparing integrated faculty: The center for the integration of research, teaching, and learning,” New Dir. Teach. Learn. 113, 69–81 (2008).
7. S. L. Tice, J. G. Gaff, and A. S. Pruitt-Logan, “Preparing future faculty programs: Beyond TA development,” in The Professional Development of Graduate Teaching Assistants: The Practitioner’s Handbook, edited by M. Marincovich, J. Prostco, and F. Stout (Anker Publishing, Bolton, MA, 1998), pp. 275–292.
8. L. C. McDermott, P. S. Shaffer, and the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington, Tutorials in Introductory Physics, 1st ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002).
10. P. L. Grossman, S. M. Wilson, and L. S. Shulman, “Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching,” in Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher, edited by M. C. Reynolds (Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1989), pp. 23–36.
11. S. Magnusson, J. Krajcik, and H. Borko, “Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching,” in PCK and Science Education, edited by J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1999), pp. 95–132.
13. N. D. Finkelstein, “Coordinating physics and education instruction,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 33(1 ), 37–41 (2003).
15.In our case, the Tutorials in Introductory Physics adopt an “Elicit-Confront-Resolve” approach to addressing student difficulties as part of their design. We acknowledge the existence of other approaches (such as the “refinement” of student prior knowledge) in similar curricula and hypothesize that our findings may extend to other such approaches.
16. N. D. Finkelstein and S. J. Pollock, “Replicating and understanding successful innovations: Implementing tutorials in introductory physics,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010101 (2005).
18. V. Otero et al., “A physics department’s role in preparing science teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model,” Am. J. Phys. 78(11 ), 1218–1224 (2010).
19. L. C. McDermott, P. S. Shaffer, and the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington, Instructor’s Guide for Tutorials in Introductory Physics, 1st ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002).
20. B. T. Spike and N. D. Finkelstein, “Tracking recitation instructors’ awareness of student conceptual difficulties,” in PERC Proceedings 2009, edited by M. Sabella, C. Henderson, and C. Singh (AIP Press, Melville, NY, 2009).
22. N. D. Finkelstein et al., “Teaching to Learn: The Colorado learning assistant program’s impact on learning content,” APS Forum on Education Fall 2006/Spring 2007 Newsletter, 11–13 (2007).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month