No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
An item response curves analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
2. G. A. Morris, L. Branum-Martin, N. Harshman, S. D. Baker, E. Mazur, S. Dutta, T. Mzoughi, and V. McCauley, “ Testing the test: item response curves and test quality,” Am. J. Phys. 74, 449–453 (2006).
3. R. P. McDonald, Test Theory: A Unified Treatment (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1999).
6. S. E. Embretson and S.P. Reise, Item Response Theory for Psychologists (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2000).
7. R. D. Bock, “ Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories,” Psychometrika 37, 29–51 (1972).
9. K. D. Schurmeier, C. H. Atwood, C. G. Shepler, and G. J. Lautenschlager, “ Using item response theory to assess changes in student performance based on changes in question wording,” J. Chem. Educ. 87, 1268–1272 (2010).
10. J. A. Marshall, E. A. Hagedorn, and J. O’Connor, “ Anatomy of a physics test: validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 5, 010104 (2009).
11. F. M. Lord, Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1980).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month