banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
On the connection between image formation formulas in geometrical optics and beam transformation formulas in wave optics
Rent this article for
View: Figures


Image of Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Definition of the two-component vector , defining the position and the inclination of an optical ray at  =  .

Image of Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

(Color online) Transformation of a beam by a paraxial optical system described by matrix elements . The incoming beam has its waist in plane . Coordinates and are measured with respect to conjugate plane and the position of the waist of the emerging beam, respectively. Here is the object distance from the entrance of the optical system, obtained from geometrical optics, while and are, respectively, the distance of the geometrical image and that of the minimum radius to the exit of the POS.

Image of Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

(Color online) Illustration of the beam caustic (solid) and ray tracing (dashed) produced by a pair of lenses for a beam waist located in the object focal plane of the first lens, for various values of the distance between the lenses. From top to bottom: (a) afocal system = + ; (b) negative power ( > + ); and (c) positive power ( < + ) doublets. Depending on the sign of , the waist is shifted downstream ( < 0) or upstream ( > 0) with respect to the geometrical image plane. The beam caustics are shown for illustration only; they do not correspond to = .

Image of Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

(Color online) Beam intensity profiles at the object plane and minimum waist plane for three values of δ:  = 0 (solid),  = 3.18 cm (short-dashed), and  = 6.35 cm (dashed); the Rayleigh length is  = 10 cm. The Fresnel number corresponding to the latter two values is shown. A faithful reproduction of the input beam with a magnification =| |= 2 is obtained in the geometrical image plane for any value of ; however, at the minimum width the beam profile differs significantly from that in the object plane when . The transformed beams were calculated using Eq. (22) of Ref. 42 .

Image of Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

(Color online) Illustration of the beam profiles (in phase and intensity) in the geometrical image plane and at the waist for > 0 for the case of a flat-top beam distribution in the object waist plane. At  = 0 the beam intensity profile remains that calculated by geometrical optics, in accordance with Eq. (38) . The beam profile at the waist is determined by the Fresnel number associated with the aperture of the image plane seen from the waist.

Image of Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Magnification of image waist as a function of for  = 1 cm and 10 cm calculated using Eq. (28) . The magnification is maximum at  = 0, when || = | | = 2. When the Rayleigh length of the beam diminishes, so does the deviation from the theory of geometrical optics, and the magnification is approximately independent of , with || ≈ | |.

Image of Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

Position of the image waist as a function of calculated with Eq. (26) for two values of the Rayleigh length:  = 10 cm (thick solid) and  = 1 cm (thin solid). For  = 0, the image waist and the geometrical image coincide at the image focal plane of the second lens so that = ′ =   = 20 cm. The departure from geometrical optics diminishes for smaller values of the Rayleigh length.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: On the connection between image formation formulas in geometrical optics and beam transformation formulas in wave optics