Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aapt/journal/ajp/84/8/10.1119/1.4953824
1.
Melba Phillips, “ Science and progress,” Am. J. Phys. 42(5), 358360 (1974).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1987701
2.
Kim Rendfeld, “ Outtakes of a historical novelist,” <https://kimrendfeld.wordpress.com/> (accessed May 26, 2016).
3.
Francis W. Sears, “ The most important thing,” Am. J. Phys. 30(6), 401403 (1962).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1942051
4.
National Research Council, Adapting to a Changing World—Challenges and Opportunities in Undergraduate Physics Education (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2013). Available online at <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18312/adapting-to-a-changing-world–challenges-and-opportunities-in-undergraduate-physics-education>.
5.
Eric M. Rogers, “ Examinations: Powerful agents for good or Ill in teaching,” Am. J. Phys. 37(10), 954962 (1969).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1975217
6.
Jennifer L. Docktor and Jose P. Mestre, “ Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 10(2), 020119-158 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
7.
David E. Meltzer and Ronald K. Thornton, “ Resource letter ALIP–1: Active-learning instruction in physics,” Am. J. Phys. 80(6), 478496 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3678299
8.
PhysPort, <www.physport.org> (accessed May 26, 2016).
9.
American Association of Physics Teachers, “ ComPADRE—Resources and services for physics education,” <http://www.compadre.org/> (accessed May 26, 2016).
10.
PhysPort Assessment Data Explorer, <http://www.physport.org/dataexplorer> (accessed May 26, 2016).
11.
Anonymous Live Audience Participation, <http://www.polleverywhere.com/> (accessed May 16, 2016).
12.
Word clouds created using <http://worditout.com/>.
13.
A. P. French and Edwin F. Taylor, Introduction to Quantum Physics ( W. W. Norton & Company, New York, New York, 1978).
14.
M. C. Wittmann, J. T. Morgan, and L. Bao, “ Addressing student models of energy loss in quantum tunneling,” Eur. J. Phys. 29, 939950 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/26/6/001
15.
S. B. McKagan and C. E. Wieman, “ Exploring student understanding of energy through the quantum mechanics conceptual survey,” AIP Conf. Proc. 818, 6568 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2177024
16.
Jeffrey T. Morgan, Michael C. Wittmann, and John R. Thompson, “ Student understanding of tunneling in quantum mechanics: Examining interview and survey results for clues to student reasoning,” AIP Conf. Proc. 720(1), 97100 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1807263
17.
Mario Belloni, Wolfgang Christian, and Anne J. Cox, Physlet Quantum Physics: An Interactive Introduction, 2nd ed. ( Davidson College, Davidson, NC, 2014) available at <http://www.compadre.org/pqp/>.
18.
Chandralekha Singh, “ Interactive learning tutorials on quantum mechanics,” Am. J. Phys. 76(4), 400405 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2837812
19.
Steve Goldhaber et al., “ Transforming upper-division quantum mechanics: Learning goals and assessment,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1179, 145 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3266699
20.
David McIntyre, Corinne A. Manogue, and Janet Tate, Quantum Mechanics: A Paradigms Approach ( Pearson Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2012).
21.
A. Kohnle et al., “ Enhancing student learning of two-level quantum systems with interactive simulations,” Am. J. Phys. 83, 560566 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4913786
22.
Antje Kohnle and Derek Raine, “ Quantum mechanics teaching resources from the Institute of Physics,” New Directions 10, 4043 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2014.00031
23.
R. Müller and H. Wiesner, “ Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level,” Am. J. Phys. 70, 200209 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1435346
24.
E. Cataloglu and R. W. Robinett, “ Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career,” Am. J. Phys. 70(3), 238251 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1405509
25.
Homeyra R. Sadaghiani and Steven J. Pollock, “Quantum mechanics concept assessment: Development and validation study” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11(1), 010110-114 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010110
26.
Guangtian Zhu and Chandralekha Singh, “ Surveying students' understanding of quantum mechanics in one spatial dimension,” Am. J. Phys. 80(3), 252259 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3677653
27.
Johan Falk, “ Developing a quantum mechanics concept inventory,” M.S. thesis, Uppsala University (2004).
28.
Sura Wuttiprom et al., “ Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 31(5), 631654 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690701747226
29.
S. McKagan, “ QMCS (Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey),” <http://www.colorado.edu/physics/EducationIssues/QMCS/> (accessed February 15, 2015).
30.
S. B. McKagan, K. K. Perkins, and C. E. Wieman, “ Design and validation of the quantum mechanics conceptual survey,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6(2), 020121-117 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020121
31.
PhysPort Assessment, <https://www.physport.org/assessments/> (accessed May 24, 2016).
32.
Edwin F. Taylor, “ ‘The boundaries of nature: Special and general relativity and quantum mechanics, a second course in physics:’ Edwin F. Taylor's acceptance speech for the 1998 Oersted Medal presented by the American Association of Physics Teachers, 6 January 1998,” Am. J. Phys. 66(5), 369376 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18875
33.
A. Sommerfeld, “ Some reminiscences of my teaching career,” Am. J. Phys. 17(5), 315316 (1949).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1989585
34.
Arnold Arons, “ Toward wider public understanding of science,” Am. J. Phys. 41(6), 769782 (1973).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1987384
35.
National Research Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas, edited by Helen Quinn, Heidi Schweingruber, and Thomas Keller ( The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2012).
36.
Jacqueline D. Spears and Dean Zollman, The Fascination of Physics ( Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park, CA, 1985).
37.
Jacqueline D. Spears and Dean Zollman, “ The fascination of physics,” <https://web.phys.ksu.edu/fascination/Contents.htm> (accessed May 15, 2016).
38.
D. A. Zollman, N. S. Rebello, and K. Hogg, “ Quantum mechanics for everyone: Hands-on activities integrated with technology,” Am. J. Phys. 70(3), 252529 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1435347
39.
Dean Zollman et al., “ Visual quantum mechanics,” <https://web.phys.ksu.edu/vqm/> (accessed February 15, 2015).
40.
Dean Zollman et al., “ Modern miracle medical machines,” <http://web.phys.ksu.edu/mmmm> (accessed June 15, 2015).
41.
The most recent version can be viewed at <https://k-state.instructure.com/courses/20350>.
42.
E. Leonard Jossem, “ ‘The world around Us,’ E. Leonard Jossem's acceptance speech for the 1994 Oersted Medal presented by the American Association of Physics Teachers, 6 January 1994,” Am. J. Phys. 62(7), 589595 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.17532
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapt/journal/ajp/84/8/10.1119/1.4953824
Loading
/content/aapt/journal/ajp/84/8/10.1119/1.4953824
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapt/journal/ajp/84/8/10.1119/1.4953824
2016-08-01
2016-12-08

Abstract

Modern Physics has been used as a label for most of physics that was developed since the discovery of X-rays in 1895. Yet, we are teaching students who would not use the label “modern” for anything that happened before about 1995, when they were born. So, are we and our students in worlds that differ by a century? In addition to content, sometimes our students and we have differing views about methods and styles of teaching. A modern course in any topic of physics should include applications of contemporary research in physics education and the learning sciences as well as research and developments in methods of delivering the content. Thus, when we consider teaching Modern Physics, we are challenged with deciding what the content should be, how to adjust for the ever increasing information on how students learn physics, and the constantly changing tools that are available to us for teaching and learning. When we mix all of these together, we can teach modern Modern Physics or maybe teach Modern Physics modernly.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapt/journal/ajp/84/8/1.4953824.html;jsessionid=ZHCB_grBP3gHNdDIyuIJYDTt.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aapt/journal/ajp/84/8/10.1119/1.4953824&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapt/journal/ajp
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=ajp.aapt.org/84/8/10.1119/1.4953824&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/84/8/10.1119/1.4953824'
Top,Right1,Right2,