Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.D. Hestenes, “Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction,” Am. J. Phys. 55, 440454 (May 1987).
2.I. Halloun, “Schematic modeling for meaningful understanding of physics,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. 33, 10191041 (1996).
3.I. Halloun, “Schematic concepts for schematic models of the real world: The Newtonian concept of force,” Sci. Educ. 82, 239 (April 1998).
4.I. M. Greca and M. A. Moreira, “Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics,” Sci. Educ. 86, 106 (Jan. 2002).
5.A. G. Harrison and D. F. Treagust, “Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry,” Sci. Educ. 84, 352381 (May 2000).
6.M. Wells, D. Hestenes, and G. Swackhamer, “A modeling method for high school physics instruction,” Am. J. Phys. 63, 606619 (July 1995).
7.L. Grosslight, C. Unger, and E. Jay, “Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. 28, 799822 (1991).
8.D. F. Treagust, G. Chittleborough, and T. L. Mamiala, “Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 24, 357 (April 2002).
9.J. Ryder and J. Leach, “Interpreting experimental data: The views of upper secondary school and university science students,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22, 1069 (Oct. 2000).
10.R. S. Justi and J. K. Gilbert, “Modelling, teachers views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 24, 369 (April 2002).
11.Jane Jackson (private communication).
12.G. Holton and S.G. Brush, Physics, the Human Adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and Beyond, 3rd ed. (Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2001), p. 526.
13.E. Etkina, T. Matilsky, and M. Lawrence, “What can we learn from pushing to the edge? Rutgers Astrophysics Institute motivates talented high school students,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40, 958985 (2003).
14.C. T. Hill and L. M. Lederman, “Teaching symmetry in the introductory physics curriculum,” Phys. Teach. 38, 348 (Sept. 2000).
15.A. Van Heuvelen, “Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies,” Am. J. of Phys. 59, 891897 (Oct.1991).
16.J. R. Frederiksen, B. Y. White, and J. Gutwill, “Dynamic mental models in learning science: The importance of constructing derivational linkages among models,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. 36, 809836 (1999).
17.J.L. Lemke, “Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions,”∼jaylemke/papers/barcelon.htm.
18.Students engage in similar activities while solving context-rich problems as in P. Heller, R. Keith, and S. Anderson, “Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping Part 1,” Am. J. Phys. 60, 627636 (July 1992).
19.Videos for modeling tasks and other videotaped experiments can be found at The video of this experiment can be found at

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd