Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Concept Inventories for ASTRO 101
1.I. A. Halloun and D. Hestenes, “The initial knowledge state of college physics students,” Am. J. Phys. 53(11), 1043–1055 (1985);
1.D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer, “Force Concept Inventory,” Phys. Teach. 30(3), 141–158 (March 1992).
2.D. Maloney, T. O'Kuma, C. Hieggelke, and A. Van Heuvelen, “Surveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism,” Am. J. Phys. 69, S12–S23 (2001).
3.D. L. Anderson, K. M. Fisher, and G. J. Norman, “Development and evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. 39(10), 952–978 (2002).
4.J. C. Libarkin and S. W. Anderson, “Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results from the Geoscience Concept Inventory,” J. Geosci. Educ. 53(4), 394–401 (2005).
5.J. Epstein, presented at the STEM Assessment Conference, Washington, DC (2006). Online at http://www. openwatermedia.com/downloads/STEM(for-posting). pdf#page=64.
6.K. Allen, PhD dissertation, The University of Oklahoma, 2006.
7.R. S. Lindell, PhD dissertation, University of Nebraska, 2001.
8.E. M. Bardar, E. E. Prather, K. Brecher, and T. F. Slater, “Development and validation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory,” Astron. Educ. Rev. 5(2), 103–113 (2007). Online at http://aer.noao.edu/cgibin/article.pl?id=225.
9.J. M. Keller, doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, 2006.
10.J. M. Bailey, doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, 2006.
11.B. Hufnagel, “Development of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test,” Astron. Educ. Rev. 1(1), 47–51 (2002). Online at http://aer.noao.edu/AERArticle.php?issue=1 §ion=1 &article=4.
12.C. A. Mertler and R. A. Vannatta, Advanced and Multi-variate Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. (Pyrczak Publishing, Los Angeles, 2002).
13.R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys. 66(1), 64–74 (1998).
14.J. M. Bailey, “Using concept inventories to gauge student understanding in astronomy,” in Cosmos in the Classroom 2007: Proceedings (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2008), pp. 11–14.
Article metrics loading...