No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
2.H. Petroski, To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design (Vintage Publishing, 1992).
3.H. Petroski, Success Through Failure (Princeton University Press, 2006).
4.S. Squyres, Roving Mars (Hyperion Publishing, 2006).
5.Verbal permission to use the images contained in the final report was given by Scott Nacheman of Thornton Tomasetti Inc., via a phone call on May 24, 2013.
8.Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., “Executive Summary, Indiana State Fair Commission August 13, 2011 Collapse Incident Investigative Report” (Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., 2012), p. 9.
9.M. Wisniewski, “Indiana Fines Company, Union in Deadly Stage Collapse,” Reuters, Feb. 8, 2012.
10.Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., “Final Report, Indiana State Fair Commission August 13, 2011 Collapse Incident Investigative Report” (Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.).
12.S. Olson, “Costs of Indiana State Fair Stage Collapse Investigation Could Be Steep,” Indianapolis Business Journal (Sept. 9, 2011).
Article metrics loading...
On Aug. 13, 2011, at 8:45 p.m. country music fans were eagerly awaiting the band Sugarland to make its entry onto the main stage at the Indiana State Fairgrounds. Also competing for the fans' attention was an approaching storm. Sugarland never made their entrance. At 8:49 p.m. the stage rigging was hit by 59 mile/h (94 km/h) winds causing it to collapse, killing seven people and injuring 58. 1 A simplified facsimile model of this collapse is presented here that can be used as a case study in applying fundamental physics concepts appropriate for an introductory class. It is a forensic physics/engineering investigation. Afterwards, key aspects of the actual investigation will be presented.
Full text loading...
Most read this month