No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Digital Devices, Distraction, and Student Performance: Does In-Class Cell Phone Use Reduce Learning?
1. Crossgrove, K. , and Curran, K. L. 2008, “ Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-Level Biology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course Material,” CBE Life Sciences Education, 7, 146.
3. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research 2010, “Students and Information Technology,” ECAR Research Study 6, 37.
4. Gauci, S. A. , Dantas, A. M. , Williams, D. A. , and Kemm, R. E. 2009, “ Promoting Student-Centered Active Learning in Lectures with a Personal Response System,” Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 30.
6. Hoekstra, A. 2009, “ A Socio-Cultural Analysis of the Use of Clickers in Higher Education,” doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, available in Digital Dissertations.
7. Mazur, E. 1997, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manuel, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Smith, M. K. , Wood, W. B. , Adams, W. K. , Wieman, C. K. , Knight, J. K. , Guild, N. , and Su, T. T. 2009, “ Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions,” Science, 323, 122.
Full text loading...
Most read this month