No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Activities-based Astronomy: An Evaluation of an Instructor’s First Attempt and its Impact on Student Characteristics
1.Bonwell, C. C. , & Eison, J. A. 1991, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1, Washington D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
2.Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. 1998, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for Americas Research Universities, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
3.Coffey, A. , & Atkinson, P. 1996, Making Sense of Qualitative Data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4.Deming, G. L. , Miller, S. T. , & Trasco, J. D. 1997, Cooperative Learning Activities in Introduction Astronomy for Non-Science Majors, College Park: University of Maryland.
5.Ebert-May, D. , Brewer, C. , & Allred, S. 1997, Innovation in Large Lectures—Teaching for Active Learning, BioScience, 47(9), 601.
6.Erlandson, D. A. , Harris, E. L. , Skipper, B. L. , & Allen, S. D. 1993, Doing Naturalistic Inquiry; A Guide to Methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
7.Hemenway, M. K. , Straits, W. J. , Wilke, R. R. , & Hufnagel, B. 2002, Educational Research in an Introductory Astronomy Course, Innovative Higher Education, 26(4), 271.
, & Zeilik
, M. 2000
, Pre-Course Results from the Astronomy Diagnostic Test
, Publ. - Astron. Soc. Aust.
9.Johnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. , & Smith, K. 1991, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
11.National Research Council. 1996, From Analysis to Action, Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Report of a Convocation, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
12.National Science Foundation. 1996, Advisory Committee for the National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
13.Norman, G. R. , & Schmidt, H. G. 1992, The Psychological Basis of Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Evidence, Acad. Med., 67(9), 557.
14.Orzechowski, R. F. 1995, Factors to Consider before Introducing Active Learning into a Large, Lecture Based Course, J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 24, 347.
15.Rankin, M. A. 1998, Importance of Instructional Development in the College of Natural Sciences, Proceedings of the Discovery Learning Conference, Austin: University of Texas.
17.Schunk, D. H. 1994, Self-Regulation of Self-Efficacy and Attributions in Academic Settings, in Self-regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Implications, D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Editors), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.Svinicki, M. D. 1998, A Theoretical Foundation for Discovery Learning, Advances in Physiology Education, 20(1), 4.
19.Wilke, R. R. , & Straits, W. J. 2001, The Effects of Discovery Learning in a Lower-Division Biology Course, Advances in Physiology Education, 25(2), 1.
Full text loading...
Most read this month