banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Assessment of an Internet-Delivered Interactive Approach to Introductory Astronomy for Non–Science Majors
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
1.Adams, J. P. , Prather, E. E. , & Slater, T. F. 2002, Lecture-Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.Arizona Board of Regents. 1999, Learner-Centered Education in the University of Arizona System, http://www.abor.asu.edu/4_special_programs/lce/ABORactions_lce.htm.
3.Beaudrie, B. , Slater, T. F. , Stevenson, S. , & Caditz, D. 1998, Teaching Astronomy by Internet Jigsawing, Leading and Learning with Technology Journal, 26(4), 28.
4.Hufnagel, B. , Slater, T. F. , Deming, G. , Adams, J. P. , Lindell, R. , Brick, C. , & Zeilik, M. 2000, Pre-Course Results from the Astronomy Diagnostic Test, Publ. - Astron. Soc. Aust., 17(2), 152.
5.National Research Council: Bransford, J. , Brown, A. , & Cocking, R. 2000, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded Edition), Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.Prather, E. E. , & Slater, T. F. 2002, An Online Astrobiology Course for Teachers, Astrobiology, 2(2),.
7.Prather, E. E. , & Slater, T. F. 2004, A Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Large Enrollment Introductory Astronomy, in review.
8.Redish, E. F. , Steinberg, R. N. , & Saul, J. M. 1998, Student Expectations in Introductory Physics, Am. J. Phys., 66, 212.
9.Slater, T. F. 1998, Using Real-Time Earth and Space-Science Data in the Classroom, Leading and Learning with Technology Journal, 26(2), 28.
10.Slater, T. F. , & Beaudrie, B. 2000, Far Out Measurements: Bringing the Planets Closer to Home Using Image Processing Techniques, Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(5), 36.
11.Slater, T. F. , & Adams, J. P. 2002, Learner-Centered Astronomy Teaching: Strategies for ASTRO 101, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.Slater, T. F. , & Beaudrie, B. 1997, Using the Internet to Bring Authentic Science Investigations to the Classroom, Leading and Learning with Technology, 25(4), 28.
13.Slater, T. F. , & Fixen, R. L. 1998, Two Models for K-12 Hypermediated Earth System Science Lessons Based on Internet Resources, School Science and Mathematics Journal, 98(1), 35.
14.Slater, T. F. , Beaudrie, B. , & Fixen, R. L. 1998, Integrating K-12 Hypermediated Earth System Science Activities Based on World-Wide-Web Resources, Journal of Geoscience Education, 46(2), 149.
15.Slater, T. F. , Beaudrie, B. , Cadtiz, D. M. , Governor, D. , Roettger, E. R. , Stevenson, S. , & Tuthill, G. F. 2001, A Systemic Approach to Improving K-12 Astronomy Education Using NASA’s Internet Resources, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(2), 163.
16.Threlkeld, R. , & Brzoska, K. 1994, Research in Distance Education, in Distance Education: Strategies and Tools, B. Willis (Editor), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
17.Zeilik, M. , Schau, C. , & Mattern, N. 1999, Conceptual Astronomy. II. Replicating Conceptual Gains, Probing Attitude Changes Across Three Semesters, Am. J. Phys., 67(10), 923.


Image of Figure 1.

Click to view

Figure 1.

The Astronomy Online interface.

Image of Figure 2.

Click to view

Figure 2.

The principal features of each weekly AOL learning module.


Generic image for table

Click to view

Table 1.

Quantitative Comparison Data


This project explores the effectiveness of learner-centered education (LCE) principles and practices on student learning and attitudes in an online interactive introductory astronomy course for non-science majors by comparing a high-quality Internet-delivered course with a high-quality on-campus course, both of which are based on the principles of LCE. To date, there have been numerous comparisons of conventional lecture courses with distance-learning courses described in the literature, which show little significant difference between the two learning environments. A careful review suggests that these are often noninteractive lecture courses, compared with traditional reading and correspondence courses in which assignments are submitted via e-mail. In contrast, this study compares an interactive Internet-delivered course with a learner-centered on-campus course, both of which use highly interactive teaching techniques characteristic of LCE. To do this, we created a hypermedia learning experience for introductory astronomy that matches Internet technology with how people learn. This course weaves multimedia visualizations into a structured learning environment by breaking down complex concepts into bite-sized pieces. Each cognitive piece contains hyperlinks that explain all terms. Illustrations consist of high-resolution images, animations, and videos that students manipulate to answer questions. Each module helps students engage in the pursuit of learning astronomy by providing activities in which students use astronomical data. Learners are required to answer premodule questions—not as multiple-choice questions, but as written narratives—about the concept under study to make their knowledge explicit. At the conclusion stage, students compare new ideas with their initial answers and evaluate various alternative explanations. We find that although this innovative course accomplishes its goals and students achieve an acceptable level of achievement, the high-quality on-campus course experience yields significantly higher achievement gains.


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Assessment of an Internet-Delivered Interactive Approach to Introductory Astronomy for Non–Science Majors