No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Development and Validation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory
1.Allen, M. J. , & Yen, W. M. 1979, Introduction to Measurement Theory, Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
2.Ambrose, B. S. , Heron, P. R. L. , Vokos, S. , & McDermott, L. C. 1999, “Student Understanding of Light as an Electromagnetic Wave: Relating the Formalism to Physical Phenomena,” Am. J. Phys., 67(10), 891.
3.Ambrose, B. S. , Shaffer, P. S. , Steinberg, R. N. , & McDermott, L. C. 1999, “An Investigation of Student Understanding of Single-Slit Diffraction and Double-Slit Interference,” Am. J. Phys., 67(2), 146.
4.Bardar, E. M. 2006, “Development and Analysis of Spectroscopic Learning Tools and the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory for Introductory College Astronomy,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
5.Bardar, E. M. 2007, “First Results from the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory,” in preparation.
6.Bardar, E. M. (Weeks) , Prather, E. E. , Brecher, K. , & Slater, T. F. 2005, “The Need for a Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory for Assessing Innovations in Introductory Astronomy Survey Courses,” Astronomy Education Review, 4(2), 20.
8.Comins, N. F. 2001, Heavenly Errors, New York: Columbia University Press.
9.Crocker, L. , & Algina, J. 1986, Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory, New York: Holt.
11.Ebel, R. L. 1965, Measuring Educational Achievement, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.Hake, R. R. 1998, “Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses,” Am. J. Phys., 66, 64.
13.Haladyna, T. M. 1994, Developing and Validating Multiple-Choice Test Items, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.Lee, S. 2002, “Students’ Understanding of Spectra,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
17.Lindell, R. S. 2001, “Enhancing College Students’ Understanding of Lunar Phases,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
18.Litwin, M. S. 1995, How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19.Mazur, E. 1997, Peer Instruction, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.Nunnally, J. C. 1967, Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.Prather, E. E. , Slater, T. F. , Adams, J. P. , Bailey, J. M. , Jones, L. V. , & Dostal, J. A. 2004, “Research on a Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Teaching Introductory Astronomy for Non-Science Majors,” Astronomy Education Review, 3(2), 122.
23.Schwab, J. J. 1963, Biology Teachers’ Handbook, New York: Wiley.
24.Slater, T. F. , & Adams, J. P. 2003, Learner-Centered Astronomy: Strategies for Teaching ASTRO 101, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.Slater, T. F. , Adams, J. P. , Brissenden, G. , & Duncan, D. 2001, “What Topics Are Taught in Introductory Astronomy Courses?” Phys. Teach., 39, 52.
26.Tamir, P. 1971, “An Alternative Approach to the Construction of Multiple Choice Test Items,” Journal of Biological Education, 3, 305.
28.Wosilait, K. , Heron, P. R. L. , Shaffer, P. S. , & McDermott, L. C. 1999, “Addressing Student Difficulties in Applying a Wave Model to the Interference and Diffraction of Light,” Physics Education Research, Am. J. Phys. supplement, 67(7), S5.
29.Zeilik, M. , & Morris-Dueer, V. J. 2005, “What Are Essential Concepts in ‘Astronomy 101’?: A New Approach to Find Consensus from Two Different Samples of Instructors,” Astronomy Education Review, 3(2), 61.
30.Zeilik, M. , Schau, C. , & Mattern, N. 1998, “Misconceptions and Their Change in University-Level Astronomy Courses,” Phys. Teach., 36, 12.
This article describes the development and validation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory (LSCI), a 26-item diagnostic test designed (1) to measure students’ conceptual understanding of topics related to light and spectroscopy, and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional interventions in promoting meaningful learning gains in an introductory college astronomy course. We also present the final field—tested version of the LSCI for general use by the astronomy education community.
Full text loading...
Most read this month