No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Toward a Methodology for Informal Astronomy Education Research
1.Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA). 2006, “Comments on the Draft NSF Strategic Plan and the Relationship of Astronomy to the American Competitiveness Initiative,” available online, http://www.aura-astronomy.org/nv/nuresult.asp?nuid=132.
2.Bishop, J. E. 1977, “United States Astronomy Education: Past, Present, and Future,” Sci. Educ., 61, 295.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730610305
3.Broome, E. C. 1902, “A Historical and Critical Discussion of College Admission Requirements,” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Columbia University.
4.Dick, B. 1999, “What Is Action Research?” available online, http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/whatisar.html.
5.Dierking, L. D. 1991, “Learning Theory and Learning Styles: An Overview,” Journal of Museum Education, 16, 4.
6.Dierking, L. D. , Falk, J. H. , Rennie, L. J. , Anderson, D. , & Ellenbogen, K. 2003, “Policy Statement of the ‘Informal Science Education’ Ad Hoc Committee,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40(2), 108.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10066
7.Fadigan, K. A. , & Hammrich, P. L. 2004, “A Longitudinal Study of the Educational and Career Trajectories of Female Participants of an Urban Informal Science Education Program,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 41(8), 835.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20026
8.Fraknoi, A. 1995, “The State of Astronomy Education in the U.S.,” in Astronomy Education: Current Developments, Future Coordination, Proceedings of ASP, J. Percy (Editor), San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 9.
9.Good, T. L. , Slavings, R. L. , Harel, K. H. , & Emerson, H. 1987, “Student Passivity: A Study of Question Asking in K–12 classrooms,” Sociology of Education, 60(3), 181.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112275
10.Greenwood, D. J. , & Levin, M. 1998, Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11.Groome, M. , Rivet, A. E. , & Suh, Y. 2005, “Providing Students with Question Asking Alternatives in the Middle School Setting,” paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Dallas, TX.
12.Hoadley, C. M. 2004, “Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research,” Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203.http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_2
13.Keeves, J. P. 1997, Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook, 2nd ed., Oxford: Pergamon.
14.Keeves, J. P. 1998, “Methods and Processes in Research in Science Education,” in International Handbook of Science Education, B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Editors), London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1127.
15.Koch, J. 1990, “The Science Autobiography,” Sci. Child., 28(3), 42.
16.LeCompte, M. D. , & Preissle, J. 1993, Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, 2nd ed., San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.Marché, J. D. 2001, “Sputnik, Planetaria, and the Rebirth of U.S. Astronomy Education,” The Planetarian, 30(1), 4.
18.Marché, J. D. 2002, “Mental Discipline, Curricular Reform, and the Decline of U.S. Astronomy Education, 1893–1920,” Astronomy Education Review, 1(1), 58.http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2001006
19.National Educational Association. 1899, “Report of the Committee on College-Entrance Requirements,” Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting held at Los Angeles, California, July 11–14, 1899, 632.
20.National Research Council. 1996, National Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.National Science Teachers Association. 1998, “Informal Science Education,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 28(1), 17.
22.Rorer, J. T. 1906, “The Need of a Revival of Interest in Astronomy in Our Schools and Colleges,” Popular Astronomy, 340.
23.U.S. Bureau of Education. 1893, Report of the Committee on Secondary School Studies Appointed at the Meeting of the National Educational Association, July 9, 1892 with the Reports of the Conferences arranged by this Committee and held December 28–30, 1892, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
24.van Zee, E. H. , Iwasyk, M. , Kurose, A. , Simpson, D. , & Wild, J. 2001, “Student and Teacher Questioning during Conversations about Science,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 38(2), 159.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J
25.Wolcott, H. F. 1990, “On Seeking-and Rejecting-Validity in Qualitative Research,” in Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate, E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Editors), New York: Teachers College Press, 121.
Click to view
Model for Action Evaluation
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month