No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Equivalent dynamical complexity in a many-body quantum and collective human system
2. X. Gabaix, P. Gopikrishnan, V. Plerou, and H. E. Stanley, “A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations,” Nature 423, 267 (2003).
3. J. C. Bohorquez, S. Gourley, A. R. Dixon, M. Spagat, and N. F. Johnson, “Common ecology quantifies human insurgency,” Nature 462, 911 (2009).
4. A. L. Barabasi, and H. E. Stanley, “Fractal concepts in surface growth,” (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
6. L. F. Richardson, “Statistics of deadly quarrels,” (Boxwood reprint edition, 1960).
7. P. Ball, “Critical mass: how one thing leads to another,” (Arrow, 2005).
8. M. Buchanan, “Ubiquity: the new science that is changing the world,” (Phoenix, 2001).
11. M. Fratini, N. Poccia, A. Ricci, G. Campi, M. Burghammer, G. Aeppli, and A. Bianconi, “Scale-free structural organization of oxygen interstitials in La2CuO4 + y,” Nature 466, 841 (2010).
15. H. Alloul, F. Rullier-Albenque, B. Vignolle, D. Colson, and A. Forget, “Superconducting fluctuations, pseudogap and phase diagram in cuprates,” Europhys. Lett. 91, 37005 (2010).
16. Y. Okada, Y. Kuzuya, T. Kawaguchi, and H. Ikuta, “Enhancement of superconducting fluctuation under the coexistence of a competing pseudogap state in Bi2Sr2?xRxCuOy,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 214520 (2010).
17. Y. Okada
, T. Kawaguchi
, M. Ohkawa
, K. Ishizaka
, T. Takeuchi
, S. Shin
, and H. Ikuta
, “Three energy scales characterizing the competing pseudogap state, the incoherent, and the coherent superconducting state in high-Tc cuprates
18. A. Dubroka, M Rössle1, K. W. Kim, V. K Malik, D. Munzar, D. N. Basov, A. A. Schafgans, S. J. Moon, C. T. Lin, D. Haug, V. Hinkov, B. Keimer, Th. Wolf, J. G. Storey, J. L. Tallon, and C. Bernhard, “Evidence of a precursor superconducting phase at temperatures as high as 180 K in RBa2Cu3O7 − δ (R=Y,Gd,Eu) superconducting crystals from infrared spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 047006 (2011).
19. G. Deutscher, “Coherence and single-particle excitations in the high-temperature superconductors,” Nature 397, 410 (1999).
20. D. Pavuna, D. Ariosa, C. Cancellieri, D. Cloetta, and M. Abrecht, “Direct angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (DARPES) on high-Tc films: doping, strains, Fermi surface topology and superconductivity,” Journal of Physics 108, 012040 (2008).
21. B. Ruszczycki, B. Burnett, Z. Zhao, and N. F. Johnson, “Relating the microscopic rules in coalescence-fragmentation models to the cluster size distribution,” European Physics Journal B 72, 1 (2009).
23. R. D’hulst, and G. J. Rodgers, “Exact solution of a model for crowding and information transmission in financial markets,” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 3, 609 (2000).
24. N. F. Johnson, P. Jefferies, and P. M. Hui, “Financial market complexity,” (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
25. L. Fontanesi
, M. Wouters
, and V. Savona
, “Fragmentation and the Bose-glass phase transition of the disordered 1D Bose gas
27. R. B. Laibowitz, E. I. Alessandrini, and G. Deutscher, “Cluster-size distribution in Al-Al2O3 films near the metal-insulator transition,” Phys. Rev. B 25, 2965 (1982).
28. Z. Zhao, J. P. Calderon, C. Xu, G. Zhao, D. Fenn, D. Sornette, R. Crane, P. M. Hui, and N. F. Johnson, “Effect of social group dynamics on contagion,” Phys. Rev. E 81, 056107 (2010).
30. J. Reslen, L. Quiroga, and N. F. Johnson, “Direct equivalence between quantum phase transition phenomena in radiation-matter and magnetic systems: scaling of entanglement,” Europhys. Lett. 69, 8 (2005).
32. S. Simmons, B. M. Brown, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, M. L. W. Thewalt, K. M. Itoh, and J. J. L. Morton, “Entanglement in a solid-state spin ensemble,” Nature 470, 69 (2011).
Article metrics loading...
Proponents of Complexity Science believe that the huge variety of emergent phenomena observed throughout nature, are generated by relatively few microscopic mechanisms. Skeptics however point to the lack of concrete examples in which a single mechanistic model manages to capture relevant macroscopic and microscopic properties for two or more distinct systems operating across radically different length and time scales. Here we show how a single complexity model built around cluster coalescence and fragmentation, can cross the fundamental divide between many-body quantum physics and social science. It simultaneously (i) explains a mysterious recent finding of Fratini et al. concerning quantum many-body effects in cuprate superconductors (i.e. scale of 10−9 − 10−4 meters and 10−12 − 10−6 seconds), (ii) explains the apparent universality of the casualty distributions in distinct human insurgencies and terrorism (i.e. scale of 103 − 106 meters and 104 − 108 seconds), (iii) shows consistency with various established empirical facts for financial markets, neurons and human gangs and (iv) makes microscopic sense for each application. Our findings also suggest that a potentially productive shift can be made in Complexity research toward the identification of equivalent many-body dynamics in both classical and quantum regimes.
Full text loading...
Most read this month