1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
Light interference detection on-chip by integrated SNSPD counters
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3656744
1.
1. E. Le Coarer, S. Blaize, P. Benech, I. Stefanon, A. Morand, G. Lérondel, G. Leblond, P. Kern, J-M. Fédéli, and P. Royer, Nature Photonics 1, 473478 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.138
2.
2. J. Ferrand, G. Custillon, S. Kochtcheev, S. Blaize, A. Morand, G. Leblond, P. Benech, P. Royer, P. Kern, and E. Le Coarer, Proceedings of SPIE 7010, 701046701046 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.788913
3.
3. G. Lippmann, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris) 274275 (1891).
4.
4. G. Lippmann, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris) 92102 (1894).
5.
5. E. Le Coarer, L. G. Venancio, P. Kern, J. Ferrand, P. Puget, M. Ayraud, C. Bonneville, B. Demonte, J. Boussey, D. Barbier, S. Blaize, and T. Gonthiez, in International Conference on Space Optics, Rhodes (2010).
6.
6. G. N. Gol'tsman, O. Okunev, G. Chulkova, A. Lipatov, A. Semenov, K. Smirnov, B. M. Voronov, A. Dzardanov, C. Williams, and R. Sobolewski, Applied Physics Letters 79, 705 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1388868
7.
7. L. Maingault, M. Tarkhov, I. Florya, A. Semenov, R. Espiau de Lamaestre, P. Cavalier, G. N. Gol'tsman, J-P. Poizat, and J-C. Villégier, Journal of Applied Physics 107, 116103 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3374636
8.
8. P. Cavalier, C. Constancias, P. Feautrier, L. Maingault, A. Morand, and J-C. Villégier, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 21, 327331 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2010.2086039
9.
9. J-C. Villégier, S. Bouat, P. Cavalier, R. Setzu, R. Espiau de Lamaestre, C. Jorel, P. Odier, B. Guillet, L. Mechin, M. P. Chauvat, and P. Ruterana, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 19, 33753378 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2009.2019243
10.
10. X. Hu, D. Masciarelli, E. A. Dauler, and K. K. Berggren, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 19, 336340 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2009.2018035
11.
11. M. Lohmeyer, Optical and Quantum Electronics 29, 907922 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018581701193
12.
12. D. Bucci, B. Martin, and A. Morand, Proceedings of SPIE 7597 (2010).
13.
13. Paul Cavalier, Ph.D Thesis Grenoble University - Direct Sampling of Light Interferences with Superconducting Nanodetectors for the Realization of a SWIFTS Microspectrometer, May 2011.
14.
14. A. J. Kerman, E. A. Dauler, W. E. Keicher, J. K.W. Yang, K. K. Berggren, G. N. Gol'tsman, and B. M. Voronov, Applied Physics Letters 88, 111116 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2183810
15.
15. C. Constancias, R. Espiau de Lamaestre, O. Louveau, P. Cavalier, and J-C. Villégier, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures 25, 2041 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.2806965
16.
16. V. Anant, A. J. Kerman, E. A. Dauler, J. K. W. Yang, K. M. Rosfjord, and K. K. Berggren, Optics Express 16, 10750 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.010750
17.
17. L. Vivien, S. Laval, B. Dumont, S. Lardenois, A. Koster, and E. Cassan, Optics Communications 210, 4349 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(02)01681-4
18.
18. R. Espiau de Lamaestre, L. Maingault, L. Frey, C. Constancias, P. Cavalier, J-C. Villégier, P. Odier, and J-P. Poizat, Proceedings of SPIE 33, 72490Q72490Q (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.806198
19.
19. J-C. Villégier, S. Bouat, M. Aurino, C. Socquet-Clerc, and D. Renaud, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 21, 102106 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2010.2090837
20.
20. P. Kern, E. Le Coarer, and P. Benech, Optics Express 17, 12 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.001976
21.
21. A. Labeyrie, WO 96/37933, European Patent Office (1999).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3656744
Loading
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.

Click to view

FIG. 1.

Operating principles of (a) existing SWIFTS devices5 and (b) the SWIFTS-SNSPD prototype developed currently. In both cases, the signal probed by one nanowire reflects directly the interferogram local intensity. In (a), a gold nanowire diffuses light proportionally to the light intensity underneath, towards a CCD sensor located above. In (b), an on-chip located SNSPD detects a part of the light localized above, within the waveguide, with a sampling period p much narrower than in the previous case.

Image of FIG. 2.

Click to view

FIG. 2.

High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) cross-section observation of a 5nm thick (135) oriented, NbN epitaxial layer grown on a R-plane sapphire substrate.

Image of FIG. 3.

Click to view

FIG. 3.

Interferogram sampling scheme and stack configuration of the SWIFTS-SNSPD device. The sinusoidal wave depicts the light power modulation within the waveguide. The fabrication steps are described, with relevant dimensions applied to waveguide and nanowires (w for nanowire width, e for thickness, p for sampling period, L for total distance of analysis between first and last detectors).

Image of FIG. 4.

Click to view

FIG. 4.

(a) SWIFTS-SNSPD device alignment setup and (b) 6x8mm chip layout. The laser beam is injected through end-fire coupling in the ridge interferometer, on the chip's edge. The inset (c) shows a microscope view of the NbN 24-nanowire array, and the nanowire definition has been observed by SEM (d), with s designing the space between nanowires and w their width.

Image of FIG. 5.

Click to view

FIG. 5.

(a) Resistance versus temperature (R-T) observed for two typical nanowires; (b) Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of 4 NbN nanowires Nw21 to Nw24 (∼40nm wide) and 1 meander named SNSPD-A (∼80nm wide) from the same chip, measured at 4,2K. The varying values measured at very low voltages are due to residual bonding resistances and amplification offsets.

Image of FIG. 6.

Click to view

FIG. 6.

Graph (a) shows the typical photon counting characteristics (in counts per second) with increasing bias current measured on one of the nanowires tested in FIG.5(b), at 4.2K. Graph (b) shows the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio.

Image of FIG. 7.

Click to view

FIG. 7.

Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) simulations of interferograms issued from the two laser sources, revealing a fringe shift to be measured by the SNSPD. The distances mentioned here are given in free space, and thus are halved within the SiN interferometer. The central fringe position is not necessarily at the center of the interferometric loop (i.e. the middle of the nanowire array), as defects can induce an optical path dissymmetry between the loop branches.

Image of FIG. 8.

Click to view

FIG. 8.

Photon counting characteristics of 2 nanowires at 4.2K with different ridge-fiber alignments. When the beam is not aligned on the interferometer, the detection levels for the two laser sources are equivalent and vary identically (a). Otherwise, light is coupled into the interferometer and a clear modulation of the detected signal according to the used laser source is measured (b). The measures were done for an input light power of 1.4mW, limited by the S3FC laser capabilities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3656744
2011-10-18
2014-04-23

Abstract

A SWIFTS device (Stationary Wave Integrated Fourier Transform Spectrometer) has been realized with an array of 24 SuperconductingNanowire Single Photon Detectors (SNSPD), on-chip integrated under a Si3N4 monomode rib-waveguide interferometer. Colored light around 1.55μm wavelength is introduced through end-fire coupling, producing a counter-propagative stationary interferogram over the 40nm wide, 120nm spaced, 4nm thick epi-NbN nanowire array. Modulations in the source bandwidth have been detected using individual waveguide coupled SNSPDs operating in single photon counting mode, which is a step towards light spectrum reconstruction by inverse Fourier transform of the stationary wave intensity. We report the design, fabrication process and in-situ measurement at 4.2K of light power modulation in the interferometer, obtained with variable laser wavelength. Such micro-SWIFTS configuration with 160nm sampling period over 3.84μm distance allows a spectral bandwidth of 2μm and a wavelength resolution of 170nm. The light interferences direct sampling ability is unique and raises wide interest with several potential applications like fringe-tracking, metrology, cryptography or optical tomography.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/1/4/1.3656744.html;jsessionid=3krvjhv0i3pvu.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3656744&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Light interference detection on-chip by integrated SNSPD counters
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3656744
10.1063/1.3656744
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM