1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
Response to “Comment on ‘Indications of energetic consequences of decoherence at short times for scattering from open quantum systems’” [AIP Advances 1, 049101 (2011)]
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3660422
1.
1. C. A. Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann, E. MacA. Gray, and T. P. Blach, AIP Advances 1, 022118 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3595401
2.
2. J. Mayers and G. Reiter, Comment on Ref. 1, this issue, AIP Advances 1, 049101 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3660408
3.
3. G. F. Reiter and P. Platzman, Phys. Rev. B 71, 054107 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.054107
4.
4. J. Mayers and M. A. Adams, Calibration of the electron volt spectrometer VESUVIO at ISIS, Technical Report RAL-TR-2009-022, October 2009.
5.
5. E. MacA. Gray, C. A. Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann and T. P. Blach, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A, in press, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.09.025.
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.09.025
6.
6. C. Andreani et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 276, 297 (1989).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(89)90647-5
7.
7. V. F. Sears, Phys. Rev. B 30, 44 (1984).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.30.44
8.
8. C. Andreani, A. Filabozzi and E. Pace, Phys. Rev. B 51, 8854 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.8854
9.
9. C. Andreani, D. Colognesi, J. Mayers, G. F. Reiter, and R. Senesi, Adv. Phys. 54, 377 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00018730500403136
10.
10. J. Mayers, private communication with EMG, December 3rd 2010.
11.
11. C. Andreani, D. Colognesi, and E. Pace, Phys. Rev. B 60, 10008 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.10008
12.
12. (a) G. L. Squires, Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering (Dover Publ., Mineola, 1996);
12.(b) S. W. Lovesey, Theory of Neutron Scattering form Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984).
13.
13. (a) H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002);
13.(b) M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition (Springer, Berlin, 2007);
13.(c) W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715
14.
14. A. G. Kofman and G. Kurizki, Nature 405, 546 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35014537
15.
15. (a) C. A. Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann and M. Krzystyniak, Laser Physics 20, 990 (2010);
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X10090227
15.(b) E. B. Karlsson, Int. J. Quantum Chem., in press, doi:10.1002/qua.23023.
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1002/qua.23023
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3660422
Loading
/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3660422
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3660422
2011-11-02
2014-10-26

Abstract

The Comment by Mayers and Reiter criticizes our work on two counts. Firstly, it is claimed that the quantum decoherence effects that we report in consequence of our experimental analysis of neutron Compton scattering from H in gaseous H2 are not, as we maintain, outside the framework of conventional neutron scatteringtheory. Secondly, it is claimed that we did not really observe such effects, owing to a faulty analysis of the experimental data, which are claimed to be in agreement with conventional theory. We focus in this response on the critical issue of the reliability of our experimental results and analysis. Using the same standard Vesuvio instrument programs used by Mayers et al., we show that, if the experimental results for H in gaseous H2 are in agreement with conventional theory, then those for D in gaseous D2 obtained in the same way cannot be, and vice-versa. We expose a flaw in the calibration methodology used by Mayers et al. that leads to the present disagreement over the behaviour of H, namely the ad hoc adjustment of the measured H peak positions in TOF during the calibration of Vesuvio so that agreement is obtained with the expectation of conventional theory. We briefly address the question of the necessity to apply the theory of open quantum systems.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/1/4/1.3660422.html;jsessionid=1qoqnrgdsccfv.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3660422&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Response to “Comment on ‘Indications of energetic consequences of decoherence at short times for scattering from open quantum systems’” [AIP Advances 1, 049101 (2011)]
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/1/4/10.1063/1.3660422
10.1063/1.3660422
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM