Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/adva/2/1/10.1063/1.3694140
1.
1. N. F. Mott and R. W. Gurney, Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals. (Oxford University Press, London, 1948).
2.
2. W. G. Spitzer and C. A. Mead, Barrier Height Studies on Metal-Semiconductor Systems. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 3061 (1963).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1729121
3.
3. C. R. Crowell, H. B. Shore, and E. E. LaBate, Surface-State and Interface Effects in Schottky Barriers at n-Type Silicon Surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3843 (1965).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1713959
4.
4. L. J. Brillson, Transition in Schottky Barrier Formation with Chemical Reactivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 260 (1978).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.260
5.
5. S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2007).
6.
6. J. Bardeen, Surface States and Rectification at a Metal Semi-Conductor Contact. Phys. Rev. 71, 717 (1947).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.71.717
7.
7. A. M. Cowley and S. M. Sze, Surface States and Barrier Height of Metal-Semiconductor Systems. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3212 (1965).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1702952
8.
8. To some extent, this value can vary for different semiconductors and different doping concentrations.
9.
9. S. Kurtin, T. C. McGill, and C. A. Mead, Fundamental Transition in the electronic Nature of Solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1433 (1969).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.1433
10.
10. V. Heine, Theory of Surface States. Phys. Rev. 138, A1689 (1965).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.138.A1689
11.
11. W. E. Spicer, Unified defect model and beyond. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 1019 (1980).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.570583
12.
12. J. L. Freeouf and J. M. Woodall, Schottky barriers: An effective work function model. Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 727 (1981).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.92863
13.
13. R. T. Tung, Chemical Bonding and Fermi Level Pinning at Metal-Semiconductor Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6078 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.6078
14.
14. D. M. Alloway, M. Hofmann, D. L. Smith, N. E. Gruhn, A. L. Graham et al., Interface Dipoles Arising from Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold: UV-Photoemission Studies of Alkanethiols and Partially Fluorinated Alkanethiols. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 11690 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp034665+
15.
15. Y. Selzer and D. Cahen, Fine Tuning of Au/SiO2/Si Diodes by Varying Interfacial Dipoles Using Molecular Monolayers. Adv. Mater. 13, 508 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200104)13:7<508::AID-ADMA508>3.0.CO;2-8
16.
16. A. Vilan and D. Cahen, How organic molecules can control electronic devices. Trends Biotechnol 20, 22 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01839-X
17.
17. R. Cohen, L. Kronik, A. Shanzer, D. Cahen, A. Liu et al., Molecular Control over Semiconductor Surface Electronic Properties: Dicarboxylic Acids on CdTe, CdSe, GaAs, and InP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 10545 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja9906150
18.
18. R. Hunger, R. Fritsche, B. Jaeckel, W. Jaegermann, L. J. Webb et al., Chemical and electronic characterization of methyl-terminated Si(111) surfaces by high-resolution synchrotron photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 72, 045317 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045317
19.
19. D. Aureau, A. Moraillon, C. Henry de Villeneuve, F. Ozanam, P. Allongue et al., Electronic Properties and pH Stability of Si(111)/Alkyl Monolayers. ECS Trans. 19, 373 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1.3120717
20.
20. A. Vilan, J. Ghabboun, and D. Cahen, Molecule−Metal Polarization at Rectifying GaAs Interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 6360 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp026779b
21.
21. H. Takato, I. Sakata, and R. Shimokawa, Quinhydrone/methanol treatment for the measurement of carrier lifetime in silicon substrates. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2 41, L870 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.41.L870
22.
22. The treatment was reported originally with quinhydrone (QH), a charge transfer complex of p-benzoquinone (p-BQ) and hydroquinone (HQ). In our hands, using p-BQ or HQ solution, instead of QH, produces the same results in terms of surface dipole and passivation, as will be discussed below. We ascribe this equivalence to cross contamination of p-BQ in the HQ and vice versa.
23.
23. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3694140 for XPS results indicating that the surface is mostly methoxy-terminated, for the C-V measurements and their comparison to SBH extracted from J-V, for the BE of Si2p as measured by XPS for H-terminated and HQ-MeOH treated n-Si(100), for the XPS C1s line, for the junction band diagram, and for the full statistics of the J-V measurements. [Supplementary Material]
24.
24. A. B. Sieval, C. L. Huisman, A. Schonecker, F. M. Schuurmans, A. S. H. van der Heide et al., Silicon Surface Passivation by Organic Monolayers: Minority Charge Carrier Lifetime Measurements and Kelvin Probe Investigations. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 6846 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp034314v
25.
25. S. Avasthi, Y. Qi, G. K. Vertelov, J. Schwartz, A. Kahn et al., Silicon surface passivation by an organic overlayer of 9,10-phenanthrenequinone. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 222109 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3429585
26.
26. E. J. Nemanick, P. T. Hurley, B. S. Brunschwig, and N. S. Lewis, Chemical and Electrical Passivation of Silicon (111) Surfaces through Functionalization with Sterically Hindered Alkyl Groups. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 14800 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp057070i
27.
27. A. Salomon, D. Berkovich, and D. Cahen, Molecular modification of an ionic semiconductor–metal interface: ZnO/molecule/Au diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1051 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1543638
28.
28. L. Kronik and Y. Shapira Surface photovoltage phenomena: theory, experiment, and applications. Surf. Sci. rep. 37, 1 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(99)00002-3
29.
29. To translate relative CPD values into WF the Kelvin probe reference electrode was calibrated against that of highly oriented freshly peeled pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), with a known WF of 4.6 eV.
30.
30. H. Haick, M. Ambrico, T. Ligonzo, and D. Cahen, Discontinuous molecular films can control metal/semiconductor junctions. Adv. Mater. 16, 2145 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200400923
31.
31. Another possible explanation is that with longer alcohols as solvent the competition between hydroquinone and alkoxy species shifts towards the alkoxy, which has a lower dipole on Si than the quinone. This, though, is less likely, because even for methanol, HQ was found to bind only to a small fraction of the surface.
32.
32. B. Chhabra, S. Suzer, R. L. Opila, and C. B. Honsberg, Electrical and chemical characterization of chemically passivated silicon surfaces. Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2008. PVSC '08. 33rd IEEE 14 (2008).
33.
33. We have chosen curves for which we have C-V measurement taken immediately afterwards, but as can be seen in the supporting information they fit well in the dispersion of their families.
34.
34. Y. Liu and H. Yu, Alkyl Monolayer-Passivated Metal–Semiconductor Diodes: Molecular Tunability and Electron Transport. ChemPhysChem 3, 799 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1439-7641(20020916)3:9<799::AID-CPHC799>3.0.CO;2-V
35.
35. We added this value, although physically incorrect, for the sake of comparison with current and older data published for Si/metal junctions.
36.
36. G. Ashkenasy, D. Cahen, R. Cohen, A. Shanzer, and A. Vilan, Molecular engineering of semiconductor surfaces and devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 121 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar990047t
37.
37. A. Salomon, T. Boecking, C. K. Chan, F. Amy, O. Girshevitz et al., How Do Electronic Carriers Cross Si-Bound Alkyl Monolayers? Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 266807 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.266807
38.
38. H. Takato, I. Sakata, and R. Shimokawa, Surface passivation of silicon substrates using quinhydrone/methanol treatment. Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of 3rd World Conference on 2, 1108 (2003).
39.
39. H. Cohen, Chemically resolved electrical measurements using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1271 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1782261
40.
40. H. Cohen, C. Nogues, I. Zon, and I. Lubomirsky, e-beam-referenced work-function evaluation in an x-ray photoelectron spectrometer. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 113701 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1900296
41.
41. O. Yaffe, L. Scheres, S. R. Puniredd, N. Stein, A. Biller et al., Molecular Electronics at Metal/Semiconductor Junctions. Si Inversion by Sub-Nanometer Molecular Films. Nano Letters 9, 2390 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl900953z
42.
42. J. Schmidt and A. G. Aberle, Accurate method for the determination of bulk minority-carrier lifetimes of mono- and multicrystalline silicon wafers. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6186 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.364403
43.
43. M. B. Prince, Drift Mobilities in Semiconductors. II. Silicon. Phys. Rev. 93, 1204 (1954).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.93.1204
44.
44. The molecular surface dipole for those monolayers, as well as for other high quality SAMs on oxide-free Si we have measured, is not completely independent on the substrate type and doping. A report on that finding is to be published soon.
45.
45. R. B. Godfrey and M. A. Green, 655 mV open-circuit voltage, 17.6% efficient silicon MIS solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 790 (1979).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.90646
46.
46. R. J. Stirn and Y. C. M. Yeh, A 15% efficient antireflection-coated metal-oxide-semiconductor solar cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 27, 95 (1975).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.88375
47.
47. M. A. Green, F. D. King, and J. Shewchun, Minority-carrier MIS tunnel-diodes and their application to electron-voltaic and photo-voltaic energy-conversion .1. Theory. Solid State Electron. 17, 551 (1974).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(74)90172-5
48.
48. P. Chattopadhyay, Functional dependence of open-circuit voltage on interface parameters and doping concentration of MIS solar cells. physica status solidi (a) 140, 587 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2211400230
49.
49. M. Wittmer and J. L. Freeouf, Ideal Schottky diodes on passivated silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2701 (1992).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2701
50.
50. H. Haick, M. Ambrico, T. Ligonzo, R. T. Tung, and D. Cahen, Controlling Semiconductor/Metal Junction Barriers by Incomplete, Nonideal Molecular Monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6854 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja058224a
51.
51. J. Shewchun, M. A. Green, and F. D. King, Minority-carrier MIS tunnel-diodes and their application to electron-voltaic and photo-voltaic energy-conversion .2. Experiment. Solid State Electron. 17, 563 (1974).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(74)90173-7
52.
52. S. J. Fonash, The role of the interfacial layer in metal−semiconductor solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 1286 (1975).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.321694
53.
53. N. G. Tarr, D. L. Pulfrey, and D. S. Camporese, An analytic model for the MIS tunnel junction. IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 30, 1760 (1983).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1983.21442
54.
54. B. Chhabra, S. Bowden, R. L. Opila, and C. B. Honsberg, High effective minority carrier lifetime on silicon substrates using quinhydrone-methanol passivation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 063502 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3309595
55.
55. C. Sommerhalter, T. W. Matthes, T. Glatzel, A. Jäger-Waldau, and M. C. Lux-Steiner, High-sensitivity quantitative Kelvin probe microscopy by noncontact ultra-high-vacuum atomic force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 286 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.124357
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/2/1/10.1063/1.3694140
Loading
/content/aip/journal/adva/2/1/10.1063/1.3694140
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/2/1/10.1063/1.3694140
2012-03-05
2016-12-06

Abstract

We report near-perfect transfer of the electrical properties of oxide-free Si surface , modified by a molecular monolayer, to the interface of a junction made with that modified Si surface. Such behavior is highly unusual for a covalent, narrow bandgap semiconductor, such as Si. Short, ambient atmosphere, room temperature treatment of oxide-free Si(100) in hydroquinone (HQ)/alkyl alcohol solutions, fully passivates the Si surface, while allowing controlled change of the resulting surface potential. The junctions formed, upon contacting such surfaces with Hg, a metal that does not chemically interact with Si, follow the Schottky-Mott model for metal-semiconductor junctions closer than ever for Si-based junctions. Two examples of such ideal behavior are demonstrated: a) Tuning the molecular surface dipole over 400 mV, with only negligible band bending, by changing the alkyl chain length. Because of the excellent passivation this yields junctions with Hg with barrier heights that follow the change in the Si effective electron affinity nearly ideally. b) HQ/ methanol passivation of Si is accompanied by a large surface dipole, which suffices, as interface dipole, to drive the Si into strong inversion as shown experimentally via its photovoltaic effect. With only ∼0.3 nm molecular interlayer between the metal and the Si, our results proves that it is passivation and prevention of metal-semiconductor interactions that allow ideal metal-semiconductor junction behavior, rather than an insulating transport barrier.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/2/1/1.3694140.html;jsessionid=BbYKtG-Qz5D3epkcMrNWWMvr.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/2/1/10.1063/1.3694140&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=aipadvances.aip.org/2/1/10.1063/1.3694140&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva/2/1/10.1063/1.3694140'
Right1,Right2,Right3,