Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/11/10.1063/1.4901913
1.
1.M. McCann, B. Raabe, W. Jooss, R. Kopecek, and P. Fath, IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, I 894 (2006).
2.
2.T. H. Seo, B. K. Kim, G. U. Shin, C. Lee, M. J. Kim, H. Kim, and E-K. Suh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 051105 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4817256
3.
3.T. Hwang, H-Y Kwon, J-S Oh, J-P Hong, S-C Hong, Y. Lee, H. R. Choi, K. J. Kim, M. H. Bhuiya, and J-D Nam, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 023106 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4812982
4.
4.K. Cheng, Z. Cui, Q. Li, S. Wang, and Z. Du, Nanotechnology 23, 425303 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/42/425303
5.
5.A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6, 183 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849
6.
6.S. K. Behura, P. Mahala, A. Ray, I. Mukhopadhyay, and O. Jani, Appl. Phys. A 111, 1159 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00339-012-7335-2
7.
7.S. K. Behura, P. Mahala, S. Nayak, Q. Yang, I. Mukhopadhyay, and O. Jani, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14, 3022 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.8572
8.
8.S. K. Behura, S. Nayak, I. Mukhopadhyay, and O. Jani, Carbon 67, 766 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.069
9.
9.S. K. Behura, I. Mukhopadhyay, A. Hirose, Q. Yang, and O. Jani, Phys. Status Solidi A 210, 1817 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201329172
10.
10.F. Xia, T. Muller, Y. M. Lin, A. V. Garcia, and P. Avouris, Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 839 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.292
11.
11.O. Breitenstein, P. Altermatt, K. Ramspeck, and A. Schenk, Proceedings of the 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference (WIP, Munich, 2006), pp. 625628.
12.
12.A. Schenk and U. Krumbein, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 3185 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.360007
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/4/11/10.1063/1.4901913
Loading
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/11/10.1063/1.4901913
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/4/11/10.1063/1.4901913
2014-11-11
2016-09-30

Abstract

Fabricated bi-layer graphene (BLG) has been studied as transparent and current spreading electrode (TCSE) for silicon solar cell, using TCAD-Silvaco 2D simulation. We have carried out comparative study using both Ag grids and BLG as current spreading electrode (CSE) and TCSE, respectively. Our study reveals that BLG based solar cell shows better efficiency of 24.85% than Ag-based cell (21.44%), in all of the critical aspects, including generation rate, recombination rate, electric field, potential and quantum efficiency. Further BLG based cell exhibits pronounce rectifying behavior, low saturation current, and good turn-on voltage while studying in dark.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/4/11/1.4901913.html;jsessionid=qENgCauEmlm_dYW2yA9SK0wp.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/4/11/10.1063/1.4901913&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=aipadvances.aip.org/4/11/10.1063/1.4901913&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva/4/11/10.1063/1.4901913'
Right1,Right2,Right3,