1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
Controlling the anisotropy and domain structure with oblique deposition and substrate rotation
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/2/10.1063/1.4865248
1.
1. Y. Fukuma, Z. Lu, H. Fujiwara, G. J. Mankey, W. H. Butler, and S. Matsunuma, J. Appl. Phys. 106, 076101 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3223538
2.
2. D. O. Smith, M. S. Cohen, and G. P. Weiss, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 10 (1960).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1735441
3.
3. S. Bedanta, T. Eimuller, W. Kleemann, J. Rhensius, F. Stromberg, E. Amaladass, S. Cardoso, and P. P. Freitas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 176601 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.176601
4.
4. M. Takahashi and T. Kono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 15, 936 (1960).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.15.936
5.
5. Ya-Peng Fang, Wei He, Hao-Liang Liu, Qing-Feng Zhan, Hai-Feng Du, Qiong Wu, Hai-Tao Yang, Xiang-Qun Zhang, and Zhao-Hua Cheng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 022507 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3463458
6.
6. M. T. Umlor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 082505 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2032592
7.
7. T. G. Knorr and R. W. Hoffman, Phys. Rev. 113, 1039 (1959).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.113.1039
8.
8. Y. Hoshi, E. Suzuki, and M. Naoe, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 4945 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.361597
9.
9. Paritosh and D. J. Srolovitz, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 1963 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1432125
10.
10. S. V. Dijken, L. C. Jorritsma, and B. Poelsema, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4038 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4038
11.
11. J. L. Bubendorff, S. Zabrocki, G. Garreau, S. Hajjar, R. Jaafar, D. Berling, A. Mehdaoui, C. Pirri, and G. Gewinner, Europhys. Lett. 75, 119 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2006-10089-5
12.
12. A. Lisfi and J. C. Lodder, Phys. Rev. B 63, 174441 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.174441
13.
13. J. B. Youssef, N. Vukadinovic, D. Billet, and M. Labrune, Phys. Rev. B 69, 174402,(2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.174402
14.
14. H. Kijima, S. Ohnuma, and H. Masumoto, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 47, 3928 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2011.2154302
15.
15. J. Y. Kim, I. O. Hwang, H. C. Hong, and D. H. Shin, “Proceedings of magneto-optical recording international symposium 96,” Magn. Soc. Jpn. 20, 165, supplement no s1 (1996).
16.
16. S. Methfessel, S. Middelhoek, and H. Thomas, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1959 (1961).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1728270
17.
17. M. S. Cohen, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1841 (1963).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1729697
18.
18. D. O. Smith and K. J. Harte, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 1399 (1962).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1728745
19.
19. H. W. Fuller and M. E. Hale, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 238 (1960).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1735552
20.
20. J. McCord, R. Schäfer, R. Mattheis, and K.-U. Barholz, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 5491 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1562732
21.
21. K. J. Harte, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1503 (1968).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1656388
22.
22. O. Idigoras, A. K. Suszka, P. Vavassori, P. Landeros, J. M. Porro, and A. Berger, Phys. Rev. B 84, 132403 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.132403
23.
23. M. T. Johnson, M. T. Johnsony, P. J. H. Bloemenzx, F. J. A. den Broedery, and J. J. de Vriesz, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 1409 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002
24.
24. Chiao-Sung Chi, Bo-Yao Wang, Way-Faung Pong, Tsung-Ying Ho, Cheng-Jui Tsai, Fang-Yuh Lo, Ming-Yau Chern, and Wen-Chin Lin, J. Appl. Phys 111, 123918 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4730632
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/4/2/10.1063/1.4865248
Loading
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/2/10.1063/1.4865248
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/4/2/10.1063/1.4865248
2014-02-05
2014-07-30

Abstract

Effect of substrate rotation on anisotropy and domain structure for a thin ferromagnetic film has been investigated in this work. For this purpose Co films with 10 nm thickness have been prepared by sputtering with oblique angle of incidence for various substrate rotations. This method of preparation induces a uniaxial anisotropy due to shadow deposition effect. The magnetization reversal is studied by magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) based microscope in the longitudinal geometry. The Co films prepared by rotating the substrate with 10 and 20 rpm weakens the anisotropy but does not completely give isotropic films. But this leads to high dispersion in local grain anisotropy resulting in ripple and labyrinth domains. It is observed that the substrate rotation has moderate effect on uniaxial anisotropy but has significant effect on the magnetization reversal process and the domain structure.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/4/2/1.4865248.html;jsessionid=3r5zlzf3eykt.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/4/2/10.1063/1.4865248&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Controlling the anisotropy and domain structure with oblique deposition and substrate rotation
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/4/2/10.1063/1.4865248
10.1063/1.4865248
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM