1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
Performance comparison of dye-sensitized solar cells by using different metal oxide- coated TiO2 as the photoanode
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4863295
1.
1. B. O’ Regan and M. Gratzel, “A Low-Cost High Efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye- Sensitized Colloidal TiO2 Films,” Nature 353, 737740 (1991).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/353737a0
2.
2. M. A. Green, K. Emery, Y. Hishikawa, and W. Warta, “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 17, 8594 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.880
3.
3. N. G. Park, J. V. Lagemaat, and A. J. Frank, “Comparison of dye sensitized rutile and anatase based TiO2 solar cells,” J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 89898994 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp994365l
4.
4. Z. S. Wang, M. Yanagida, K. Sayama, and H. Sugihara, “Electronic-Insulating Coating of CaCO3 on TiO2 Electrode in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Improvement of Electron Lifetime and Efficiency,” Chem. Mater 18, 29122916 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm0603102
5.
5. X. Wu, L. Wang, F. Luo, B. Ma, C. Zhan, and Y. Qiu, “BaCO3 Modification of TiO2 Electrodes in Quasi-Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Performance Improvement and Possible Mechanism,” J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 80758079 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp0706533
6.
6. S. J. Wu, H. W. Han, Q. D. Tai, J. Zhang, S. Xu, C. Zhou, Y. Yang, H. Hu, B. Chen, and X. Zhao, “Improvement in dye-sensitized solar cells employing TiO2 electrodes coated with Al2O3 by reactive direct current magnetron sputtering,” J. Power Sources 182, 119123 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.054
7.
7. X. J. Jiao, H. Lin, D. T. Zhuang, X. Li, and J. B. Li, “Fabrication of MgO-Coated TiO2 Nanowires Films and Applicationin Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells,” Rare Metal Materials and Engineering 40, 318321 (2011).
8.
8. A. Burke, S. Ito, H. Snaith, U. Bach, J. Kwiatkowski, and M. Grätzel, “The function of a TiO2 compact layer in dye-sensitized solar cells incorporating “planar” organic dyes,” Nano. Lett. 8, 977981 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl071588b
9.
9. D. P. Chen, X. D. Zhang, C. C. Wei, C. C. Liu, and Y. Zao, “Effect of Blocking Layers Prepared by the Hydrolysis of TiCl4 Solution on the Photovoltaic Performance of a Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell,” Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin 27, 425431 (2011).
10.
10. Y. T. Qin, M. Wu, J. J. Zhang, and R. Chen, “Surface Treatment in Dye-sensitized Nanocrstalline TiO2 Solar Cell,” Chemical Industry Time 21, 4549 (2007).
11.
11. F. Fabregat-Santiago, J. Bisquert, G. Garcia-Belmonte, G. Boschloo, and A. Hagfeldt, “Influence of electrolyte in transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells studied by impedance spectroscopy,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 87, 117131 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.07.017
12.
12. S. B. Ko, A. N. Cho, M. J. Kim, C. R. Lee, and N. G. Park, “Alkyloxy substituted organic dyes for high voltage dye-sensitized solar cell: Effect of alkyloxy chain length on open-circuit voltage,” Dyes and Pigments 94, 8898 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.10.014
13.
13. G. R. A. Kumara, M. Okuya, and K. Murakami, “Dye-sensitized solid-state solar cells made from magnesium oxide-coated nanocrystalline titanium dioxide films: enhancement of the efficiency,” J. Photoch. Photobio. A: Chemistry 164(1–3), 183185 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2003.11.020
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4863295
Loading
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4863295
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4863295
2014-01-23
2014-11-26

Abstract

In order to increase the conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells, TiO photoanode surface is often covered with a metal oxide layer to form a core-shell composite structure. Different metal oxide coating on TiO as composite photoanodes can affect the cell efficiency variously. However, there still lacks the crosswise comparison among the effects of different metal oxides on TiO photoanode. In this study, TiO was coated with AlO, CaO, ZnO, MgO, FeO or BiO separately by liquid phase deposition method. The results indicated that cells with TiO/AlO, TiO/ZnO, TiO/CaO, or TiO/MgO composite film as a photoanode had higher conversion efficiency than those with un-coated TiO films. TiO/AlO showed the highest efficiency and TiO/CaO ranked second. On the contrary, cells with TiO/BiO or TiO/FeO composite film as a photoanode had lower conversion efficiency than those with un-coated TiO films. The mechanism of the cell efficiency change was also investigated. To get higher conversion efficiency, matched energy level of the metal oxide with TiO is the first prerequisite, and then the optimum coating thickness is also a necessary condition.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/4/3/1.4863295.html;jsessionid=2ulhbrs30udjf.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4863295&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Performance comparison of dye-sensitized solar cells by using different metal oxide- coated TiO2 as the photoanode
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4863295
10.1063/1.4863295
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM