Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4869291
1.
1. R. Meservey and P. M. Tedrow, Physics Reports 238, 173 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)90105-8
2.
2. P. Tedrow and R. M. Meservey, Phys Rev Lett 26, 192 (1971).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.192
3.
3. J. J. Hauser, J Low Temp Phys 7, 335 (1972).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00660071
4.
4. V. Moshchalkov, M. Menghini, T. Nishio, Q. Chen, A. V. Silhanek, V. H. Dao, L. F. Chibotaru, N. D. Zhigadlo, and J. Karpinski, Phys Rev Lett 102, 117001 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.117001
5.
5. B. Balke, G. H. Fecher, J. Winterlik, and C. Felser, Appl Phys Lett 90, 152504 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2722206
6.
6. Z. Kugler, V. Drewello, M. Schaefers, J. Schmalhorst, G. Reiss, and A. Thomas, J Magn Magn Mater 323, 198 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.08.038
7.
7. J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani, and J. Akimitsu, Nature 410, 1 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35065039
8.
8. K. Vinod, R. A. Kumar, and U. Syamaprasad, Supercond Sci Tech 20, R1 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/20/1/R01
9.
9. X. X. Xi, Supercond Sci Tech 22, 043001 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/22/4/043001
10.
10. O. Schebaum, S. Fabretti, J. S. Moodera, and A. Thomas, New J. Phys. 14, 033023 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033023
11.
11. T. Graf, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Progress in Solid State Chemistry 39, 1 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001
12.
12. D. Ebke, P. Thomas, O. Schebaum, M. Schaefers, D. Nissen, V. Drewello, A. Huetten, and A. Thomas, J Magn Magn Mater 322, 996 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.12.003
13.
13. Z. K. Liu, D. G. Schlom, Q. Li, and X. X. Xi, Appl Phys Lett 78, 3678 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1376145
14.
14. C. Buzea, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14, R115 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/14/11/201
15.
15. M. Jung, M. Jaime, and A. Lacerda, Chem. Phys. Lett. 343, 447 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00778-3
16.
16. A. Gurevich, S. Patnaik, V. Braccini, K. H. Kim, C. Mielke, X. Song, L. D. Cooley, S. D. Bu, D. M. Kim, J. H. Choi, L. J. Belenky, J. Giencke, M. K. Lee, W. Tian, X. Q. Pan, A. Siri, E. E. Hellstrom, C. B. Eom, and D. C. Larbalestier, Supercond Sci Tech 17, 278 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/17/2/008
17.
17. S. Patnaik, L. Cooley, and A. Gurevich, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14, 315 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/14/6/304
18.
18. S. Fabretti, P. Thomas, M. Meinert, I.-M. Imort, and A. Thomas, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 26, 1 (2012).
19.
19. L. Lyard, P. Samuely, P. Szabo, T. Klein, C. Marcenat, L. Paulius, K. Kim, C. Jung, H. S. Lee, B. Kang, S. Choi, S. I. Lee, J. Marcus, S. Blanchard, A. Jansen, U. Welp, G. Karapetrov, and W. Kwok, Physical Review B 66, 180502 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.180502
20.
20. T. Dahm and N. Schopohl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.017001
21.
21. A. Handstein, D. Hinz, G. Fuchs, and K. Muller, Journal of alloys and Compounds 329, 286 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01619-X
22.
22. F. Simon, A. Janossy, T. Feher, F. Murányi, S. Garaj, L. Forró, C. Petrovic, S. Bud'ko, G. Lapertot, V. Kogan, and P. Canfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047002 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.047002
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4869291
Loading
/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4869291
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4869291
2014-03-20
2016-12-06

Abstract

We investigated the magnetic anisotropy ratio of thin sputtered polycrystalline MgB films on MgO substrates. Using high magnetic field measurements, we estimated an anisotropy ratio of 1.35 for T = 0 K with an upper critical field of 31.74 T in the parallel case and 23.5 T in the perpendicular case. Direct measurements of a magnetic-field sweep at 4.2 K show a linear behavior, confirmed by a linear fit for magnetic fields perpendicular to the film plane. Furthermore, we observed a change of up to 12% of the anisotropy ratio in dependence of the film thickness.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/4/3/1.4869291.html;jsessionid=84dqW-48h_EV6-hUrkTBZ4EC.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4869291&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=aipadvances.aip.org/4/3/10.1063/1.4869291&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva/4/3/10.1063/1.4869291'
Right1,Right2,Right3,