Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.M. Schaer, F. Nüesch, D. Berner, W. Leo, and L. Zuppiroli, Adv. Funct. Mater. 11, 116 (2001).<116::AID-ADFM116>3.0.CO;2-B
2.P. E. Burrows, G. L. Graff, M. E. Gross, P. M. Martin, M. Hall, E. Mast, C. C. Bonham, W. D. Bennett, L. A. Michalski, M. S. Weaver, J. J. Brown, D. Fogarty, and L. S. Sapochak, Proc. SPIE 4105, 75 (2001).
3.G. Nisato, P. C. P. Bouten, P. J. Slikkerveer, W. D. Bennett, G. L. Graff, N. Rutherford, and L. Wiese, in Proc. Asia Display, 8th IDW (Soc. Inform. Display, San Jose, CA, 2001), p. 1435.
4.R. Paetzold, A. Winnacker, D. Henseler, V. Cesari, and K. Heuser, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 5147 (2003).
5.R. Dunkel, R. Bujas, A. Klein, and V. Horndt, Proc. IEEE 93, 1478 (2005).
6.H. Nörenberg, in Proc. of the International Display Workshop (2008), p. 1461.
7.T. Shimada, Y. Takahashi, and T. Kanno, Appl. Phys. Exp. 3, 021701 (2010).
8.P. J. Brewer, B. A. Goody, Y. Kumar, and M. J. T. Milton, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 075118 (2012).
9.S. Hara, A. Suzuki, and H. Takahagi, in Proc. of the International Display Workshop 2013 (2013), p. 510.
10.G. Nisato, H. Klumbies, J. Fahlteich, L. Müller-Meskamp, P. Weijer, P. Bouten, C. Boeffel, D. Leunberger, W. Graehlert, S. Edge, S. Cros, P. Brewer, E. Kucukpinar, J. Girolamo, and P. Srinivasan, Organic Electronics 15, 3746 (2014).
11.G. L. Graff, R. E. Williford, and P. E. Burrows, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 1840 (2004).
12.A. O’Keefe and D. A. G. Deacon, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 2544 (1988).
13.A. Suzuki, H. Takahagi, A. Uehigashi, and S. Hara, in Display Week 2014 (Society for Information Display, 2014), p. 108.
14.G. Rossi and M. Nulman, J. Apple Phys 74, 5471 (1993).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



A reliable technique for evaluating a barrier film, which is a key component used to encapsulate flexible organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), is required to reliably appraise the lifetimes of such devices. The water vapor transmission rates (WVTR) is commonly used as an indication for a barrier film. In this paper, the variables affecting WVTR measurements were investigated because the results of such evaluations typically vary widely even at a level of 10−3 g m−2 day−1 at 40 °C and 90% relative humidity (RH). The reference films used for comparative measurements were prepared to eliminate the influence of the differences between individual barrier films. The measurement procedures were carefully investigated by using three WVTR measurement systems, which are based on different principles and different detectors. Consistency between the systems in terms of the WVTR was achieved at a level of 10−5 g m−2 day−1 at 40 °C and 90%RH. These results prove the reliability of not only our evaluation but also of these three systems, provided the measurements are performed correctly. The lag time was also analyzed to determine those factors that can affect the measurement time. It was found that the time required for a system to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium state can affect the measurement time.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd