Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.S. Grimnes and Ø.G. Martinsen, Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, London, 2011).
2.W. Franco, A. Kothare, and D. Goldberg, “Controlled volumetric heating of subcutaneous adipose tissue using a novel radiofrequency technology,” Lasers Surg. Med. 41, 745 (2009).
3.J. Jimenez-Lozano, P. Vacas-Jacques, R.R. Anderson, and W. Franco, “Selective and localized radiofrequency heating of skin and fat by controlling surface distributions of the applied voltage: analytical study,” Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 7555 (2012).
4.R.Y. Ha, K. Nojima, W.P. Adams, and S.A. Brown, “Analysis of facial skin thickness: defining the relative thickness index,” Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 115, 1769 (2005).
5.T. Yamomoto and Y. Yamomoto, “Electrical properties of the epidermal stratum corneum,” Med. Biol. Eng. 19, 151 (1976).
6.S. Gabriel, R.W. Lau, and C. Gabriel, “The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues,” Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 2271 (1996).
7.J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1975).
8.I.W. McAllister and G.C. Crichton, “Analysis of the temporal electric fields in lossy dielectric media,” IEEE Trans. Elect. Insul. 26, 513 (1991).
9.B. Nadler, U. Hollerbach, and R.S. Eisenberg, “Dielectric boundary force and ist crucial role in gramicidine,” Phys. Rev. E. 68, 021905 (2003).
10.J.D. Wiley and J.G. Webster, “Analysis and control of the current distribution under circular dispersive electrodes,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 29, 381 (1982).
11.W.M. Telford, L.P. Geldart, and R.E. Sheriff, Applied Geophysics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
12.M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 10th ed. (Dover Publications, New York, 1972).
13.I.L. Kruglikov, “Microstructural inhomogeneity of electrical conductivity in subcutaneous fat tissue,” PLoS ONE 10, e0117072 (2015).
14.D.E. Lackey, D.H. Burk, M.R. Ali, R. Mostaedi, W.H. Smith, J. Park, P. Scherer, S.A. Seay, C.S. McCoin, P. Bonaldo, and S.H. Adams, “Contributions of adipose tissue architectural and tensile properties toward defining healthy and unhealthy obesity,” Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrin. Metab. 306, E233 (2014).
15.I.L. Kruglikov, “General theory of body contouring: 2. Modulation of mechanical properties of subcutaneous fat tissue,” J. Cosm. Dermatol. Sci. Appl. 4, 117 (2014).
16.A. Gonzalez-Suarez, E. Gutierrez-Herrera, E. Berjano, J.N. Jimenez-Lorano, and W. Franco, “Thermal and elastic response of subcutaneous tissue with different fibrous septa architectures to RF heating: numerical study,” Lasers Surg. Med. 47, 183 (2015).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



The layered structure of skin with multiple interfaces separating the skin layers having very different electrical characteristics significantly modifies the spatial distribution of radiofrequency (RF) current in the skin compared to that in a homogeneous medium. In this study we present the analytical solutions of Laplace’s equation describing the current densities for a two-layer skin model with homogeneous single layers for the monopolar and bipolar configurations of RF electrodes. Then we analyze analytically and numerically the optimal distances between the RF electrodes providing the maximal current concentration in a given depth or in a given depths’ interval under the skin surface. It is demonstrated that two main parameters which significantly define the optimization condition are the thickness of the dermis and the reflection coefficient of the current at the dermis/subcutis interface. According to this model, under physiological conditions, the surface under RF electrode collecting 50% of the current entering subcutis is 184 times larger than in homogeneous medium. Such redistribution of RF current will significantly reduce the local density of the current entering the fat tissue reducing the effect of its selective heating.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd