Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.Z. Zhu, V. Muratov, and T.E. Fischer, “Tribochemical polishing of silicon carbide in oxidant solution,” Wear. 225, 848856 (1999).
2.P.B. Zantye, A. Kumar, and A.K. Sikder, “Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications,” Mater. Sci. Eng. R 45, 89220 (2004).
3.C.C.A. Chen, L.-S. Shu, and S.-R. Lee, “Mechano-chemical polishing of silicon wafers,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 140, 373378 (2003).
4.H.S. Lee and H.D. Jeong, “Chemical and mechanical balance in polishing of electronic materials for defect-free surfaces,” CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 8, 485490 (2009).
5.C.J. Evans, E. Paul, D. Dornfeld, D.A. Lucca, G. Byrne, M. Tricard, F. Klocke, O. Dambon, and B.A. Mullany, “Material removal mechanisms in lapping and polishing,” CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 52, 611633 (2003).
6.M. Forsberg, “Effect of process parameters on material removal rate in chemical mechanical polishing of Si (1 0 0),” Microelectron. Eng. 77, 319326 (2005).
7.H. Lee, S. Joo, and H. Jeong, “Mechanical effect of colloidal silica in copper chemical mechanical planarization,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 61346139 (2009).
8.J. Larsen-Basse and H. Liang, “Probable role of abrasion in chemo-mechanical polishing of tungsten,” Wear. 233, 647654 (1999).
9.F.W. Preston, “The theory and design of plate glass polishing machine,” J. Soc. Glass Technol. 11, 214256 (1927).
10.K. Qina, B. Moudgilb, and C.W. Park, “A chemical mechanical polishing model incorporating both the chemical and mechanical effects,” Thin Solid Films. 446, 277286 (2004).
11.Y.G. Wang, L.C. Zhang, and A. Biddut, “Chemical effect on the material removal rate in the CMP of silicon wafers,” Wear. 270, 312316 (2011).
12.W.H. Xu, X.C. Lu, G.S. Pan, Y.Z. Lei, and J.B. Luo, “Effects of the ultrasonic flexural vibration on the interaction between the abrasive particles; pad and sapphire substrate during chemical mechanical polishing (CMP),” Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 29052911 (2011).
13.ABAQUS version 6.9. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. Pawtucket, RI (2011).
14.G. Byrne, B. Mullany, and P. Young, “The effect of pad wear on the chemical mechanical polishing of silicon wafers,” Ann. CIRP. 48, 143146 (1999).
15.G.Q. Cai, Y.S. Lu, R. Cai, and H.W. Zheng, “Analysis on lapping and polishing pressure distribution,” Ann. CIRP. 47, 235238 (1999).
16.C. Srinivasa-Murthy, D. Wang, S.P. Beaudoin, T. Bibby, K. Holland, and T.S. Cale, “Stress Distribution in Chemical Mechanical Polishing,” Thin Solid Films. 308, 533537 (1997).
17.Y.W. Zhao and L. Chang, “A micro-contact and wear model for chemical–mechanical polishing of silicon wafers,” Wear. 252, 220226 (2002).
18.R. Komanduri, D.A. Lucca, and Y. Tani, “Technological advances in fine abrasive processes,” Ann. CIRP. 46, 545596 (1997).
19.Z.H. Xu and X. LI, “Effect of sample tilt on nanoindentation behavior of materials,” Philos. Mag. 87, 299312 (2007).
20.H. Pelletier, C. Gauthier, and R. Schirrer, “Influence of the friction coefficient on the contact geometry during scratch onto amorphous polymers,” Wear. 268, 11571169 (2010).
21.H. Lee, Y. Chen, A. Claisse, and C.A. Schuh, “Finite element simulation of hot nanoindentation in vacuum,” Exp. Mech. 53, 12011211 (2013).
22.Y. Liu, L.J. Wang, and D.P. Wang, “Finite element modeling of ultrasonic surface rolling process,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211, 21062113 (2011).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



A series of simulations of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) were conducted to investigate the contact force between abrasive particles and specimens by using the finite element method (FEM). In this paper, a micro-contact model, which only involves the mechanical interactions, was set up to simulate the polishing process by changing the processing parameters, including the downward pressure, abrasive size, and polishing speed. Simulation results show that the contact force becomes larger when the downward pressure increases. In addition, when the downward pressure and abrasive size increase, the fluctuation of the contact force becomes large, whereas it declines with decreases in the polishing speed. In addition, corresponding CMP experiments were done to investigate the material removal rate (MRR) and polished average roughness (Ra) under different simulation conditions. Through the establishment of the contact force properties in the simulation and the MRR and Ra in the CMP experiment, qualitative research has been done on the relationship between the contact force in the simulation and experimental results. Experimental results indicate that the MRR and surface roughness are influenced by the contact force. A high MRR can be obtained by a large contact force and dramatic fluctuations can lead to poor surface-finish quality. The investigation contributes to obtaining higher polishing efficiency and lower surface roughness through optimization of the polishing parameters.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd