Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.E. Pelletier, M. Grenier, A. Chahbaz, and T. Bourgelas, “Array Eddy Current for Fatigue Crack Detection of Aircraft Skin Structures,” in Proc. Vth International Workshop, Advances in Signal Processing for Non Destructive Evaluation of Materials, Québec City, 2-4 Aug. 2005.
2.L. Bo, L. Feilu, J. Zhongqing, and L. Jiali, “Eddy Current Array Instrument and Probe for Crack Detection of Aircraft Tubes,” in IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (2010).
3.B. J. Darrer, J. C. Watson, P. A. Bartlett, and F. Renzoni, “Magnetic imaging: a new tool for UK national nuclear security,” Sci. Rep. 5, 7944 (2015) [Online]. Available:
4.H. Griffiths, “Magnetic induction tomography,” Meas. Sci. Technol 12(8), 11261131 (2001).
5.A.V. Korjenevsky, V.A. Cherepenin, and S. Sapetsky, “Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization,” Physiol. Meas. 21(1), 8991 (2000).
6.A.V. Korjenevsky and V.A. Cherepenin, “Magnetic induction tomography,” J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 42(4), 469474 (1997).
7.L. Ma, H-Y. Wei, and M. Soleimani, “Planar magnetic induction tomography for 3D near subsurface imaging,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 138, 6582 (2013).
8.X. Ma, A. J. Peyton, M. Soleimani, and W. R. B. Lionheart, “Imaging internal structure with electromagnetic induction tomography. Presented at Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference " (2006, April) [Online]. Available:
9.A. J. Peyton, M. S. Beck, A. R. Borges, J. E. de Oliveira, G. M. Lyon, Z. Z. Yu, M. W. Brown, and J. Ferrerra, “Development of electromagnetic tomography (EMT) for industrial applications. Part 1: sensor design and instrumentation,” in WCIPT1, Greater Manchester, 1999. p. 306.
10.M. Soleimani, “Simultaneous reconstruction of permeability and conductivity in magnetic induction tomography,” J. of Electromagn. Waves and Appl 23(5/6), 785 (2009).
11.H-Y. Wei and M. Soleimani, “A magnetic induction tomography system for prospective industrial processing applications,” Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 20(2), 406 (2012).
12.H. Griffiths, W. Gough, S. Watson, and R. J. Williams, “Residual capacitive coupling and the measurement of permittivity in magnetic induction tomography,” Physiol. Meas. 28(7), S301S311 (2007).
13.B. J. Darrer, J. C. Watson, P. A. Bartlett, and F. Renzoni, “Toward an automated setup for magnetic induction tomography,” IEEE Trans. Magn. 51(1), (2015).
14.H. A. Wheeler, “Formulas for the skin effect,” Proc. IRE 30(9), 415 (1942).
15.G. R. Quinn, “Eddy current testing,” in Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation, edited byC. J. Hellier (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003), p. 8.19 Chap. 8, sec. 4.1.
16.CRC handbook of chemistry and physics: A ready-reference book of chemical and physical data, 60th ed., (CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 1981), pp. E-85 - E-125.

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



The ability to image through metallic enclosures is an important goal of any scanning technology for security applications. Previous work demonstrated the penetrating power of electromagnetic imaging through thin metallic enclosures, thus validating the technique for security applications such as cargo screening. In this work we study the limits of electromagnetic imaging through metallic enclosures, considering the performance of the imaging for different thicknesses of the enclosure. Our results show, that our system can image a Copper disk, even when enclosed within a 20 mm thick Aluminum box. The potential for imaging through enclosures of other materials, such as Lead, Copper, and Iron, is discussed.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd