Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.T Cellmer, D Bratko, JM Prausnitz, and H. Blanch, “The competition between protein folding and aggregation: off-lattice minimalist model studies,” Biotechnol Bioeng. 89, 78-87 (2005).
2.G Bellesia and JE Shea, “Effect of beta-sheet propensity on peptide aggregation,” J Chem Phys. 130, 145103 (2009).
3.L Zhang, D Lu, and Z. Liu, “How native proteins aggregate in solution: a dynamic Monte Carlo simulation,” Biophys Chem. 133, 71-80 (2008).
4.MT Oakley, JM Garibaldi, and JD Hirst, “Lattice models of peptide aggregation: evaluation of conformational search algorithms,” J Comput Chem. 26, 1638-46 (2005).
5.RB Pandey and BL Farmer, “Aggregation and network formation in self-assembly of protein (H3.1) by a coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulation,” J. Chem. Phys. 141, 175103-1-175103-9 (2014).
6.JB GC, YR Bhandari, BS Gerstman, and PP Chapagain, “Molecular Dynamics investigations of the α-helix to β-barrel conformational transformation in the RfaH transcription factor,” J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 5101-5108 (2014).
7.A Harada, H Azakami, and A Kato, “Amyloid fibril formation of hen lysozyme depends on the instability of the C-helix (88-89),” Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72, 1523-1530 (2008).
8.A Cao, Daoying Hu, and L Lai, “Formation of amyloid fibrils from fully reduced hen egg white lysozyme,” Protein Science 13, 319-324 (2004).
9.Y Takunaga, Y Sakakibara, Y Kamada, K-I Watanabe, and Y Sugimoto, “Analysis of core region from egg white lysozyme forming amyloid fibrils,” Int. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 219-227 (2013).
10.S-Y Ow and DE Dunstan, “The effect of concentration, temperature and stirring on hen egg white lysozyme amyloid formation,” Soft Matter 9, 9692-9701 (2013).
11.S Balme et al., “Structure, orientation and stability of lysozyme confined in layered materials,” Soft Matter 9, 3188-3196 (2013).
12.DR Booth et al., “Instability, unfolding and aggregation of human lysozyme variants underlying amyloid fibrillogenesis,” Nature 385, 787-793 (1997).
13.See for general description. (as of February 9, 2015).
14.RB Pandey, Z Kuang, and BL Farmer, “A hierarchical coarse-grained (all atom to all residue) computer simulation approach: self-assembly of peptides,” PLoS one 8, e70847-1-e70847-8 (2013).
15.PL Freddolino, CB Harrison, Y Liu, and K Schulten, “Challenges in protein-folding simulations,” Nature Physics 6, 751-758 (2010).
16.See for the sequence of the lysozyme.
17.RB Pandey and BL Farmer, “Conformational response to solvent interaction and temperature of a protein (histone h3.1) by a multi-grained Monte Carlo simulation,” PLoS one 8, e76069-1-e76069-9 (2013).
18.S Tanaka and HA Scheraga, “Medium and long range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three dimensional structures of proteins,” Macromolecules 9, 945-950 (1976).
19.S Miyazawa and RL Jernigan, “Estimation of effective inter residue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation,” Macromolecules 18, 534552 (1985).
20.S Miyazawa and RL Jernigan, “Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term for simulation and treading,” J Mol Biol 256, 623-644 (1996).
21.Web site for residue-residue interaction tables:, courtesy of the research group of R.L. Jernigan.
22.Z Bagci, A Kloczkowski, RL Jernigan, and I Bahar, “The origin and extent of coarse grained irregularities in protein internal packing I,” Proteins 53, 56-67 (2003).
23.MR Betancourt and D Thirumalai, “Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes,” Protein Sci 2, 361-369 (1999).
24.VN Maiorov and GM Crippen, “Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins,” J Mol Biol 227, 876-888 (1992).
25.A Godzik, A Kolinski, and J Skolnick, “Knowledge-based potentials for protein folding: what can we learn from protein structures?,” Proteins 4, 363-366 (1996).
26.Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Polymer Science, edited by K. Binder (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
27.RB Pandey and BL Farmer, “Distinction in binding of peptides (P2E) and its mutations (P2G, P2Q) to a graphene sheet via a hierarchical coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulation,” J. Chem. Phys. 139, 164901-1-164901-6 (2013).
28.See supplementary material at for the residue-residue interaction table (from Ref. 19), range of interaction in LJ interaction.[Supplementary Material]

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



The self-organizing dynamics of lysozymes (an amyloid protein with 148 residues) with different numbers of protein chains, = , and (concentration ) is studied by a coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulation with knowledge-based residue-residue interactions. The dynamics of an isolated lysozyme ( = ) is ultra-slow (quasi-static) at low temperatures and becomes diffusive asymptotically on raising the temperature. In contrast, the presence of interacting proteins leads to concentration induced protein diffusion at low temperatures and concentration-tempering sub-diffusion at high temperatures. Variation of the radius of gyration of the protein with temperature shows a systematic transition from a globular structure (at low ) to a random coil (high ) conformation when the proteins are isolated. The crossover from globular to random coil becomes sharper upon increasing the protein concentration (i.e. with = ), with larger at higher temperatures and concentration; becomes smaller on adding more protein chains (e.g. = ) a non-monotonic response to protein concentration. Analysis of the structure factor (()) provides an estimate of the effective dimension (, globular conformation at low temperature, and , random coil, at high temperatures) of the isolated protein. With many interacting proteins, the morphology of the self-assembly varies with scale, i.e. at the low temperature ( = ), on the scale comparable to the radius of gyration of the protein, and at the large scale over the entire sample. The global network of fibrils appears at high temperature ( = ) with (i.e. a random coil morphology at large scale) involving tenuous distribution of micro-globules (at small scales).


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd