Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.P. Dallos, “Low-frequency auditory characteristics: Species dependence,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 48(2B), 489499 (1970).
2.B. C. Moore, “Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics,” Scand Audiol Suppl. 25, 13952 (1986).
3.D. Johnson-Davis and R. D. Patterson, “Psychophysical tuning curves: restricting the listening band to the signal region,” Acoust Soc Am 65, 765770 (1979).
4.B. C. Moore and B. R. Glasberg, “Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and farward masking,” Acoust Soc Am 70, 10031014 (1981).
5.A. Oxenham and C. Shera, “Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4(4), 541554 (2003).
6.E. F. Evans, “Latest comparisons between physiological and behavioral frequency selectivity,” in Physiological and behavioral bases of auditory function, edited by J. Breebaart, A. J. M. Houtsma, A. Kohlrauschl, R. Prijs, and R. Schoonhoven (Maastricht: Shaker, 2001), p. 382.
7.C. A. Shera, J. J. Guinan, and A. J. Oxenham, “Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements,” Proceedings- National Academy of Science USA 99, 33183345 (2002).
8.P. Dallos and M. A. Cheatham, “Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(3), 591597 (1976).
9.E. Verschooten, L. Robles, D. Kovacic, and P. X. Joris, “Auditory nerve frequency tuning measured with forward-masked compound action potentials,” JARO 13, 799817 (2012).
10.M. A. Ruggero and A. N. Temchin, “Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(51), 18 61418 619 (2005).
11.C. A. Shera, C. C. Guinan, Jr., and A. J. Oxenham, “Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning validation in the chinchilla,” JARO 11, 343365 (2010).
12.P. X. Joris, C. Bergevinb, R. Kalluric, M. Mc Laughlina, P. Micheleta, M. Heijdena, and C. A. Shera, “Frequency selectivity in old-world monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans,” PNAS 108(42), (2011).
13.Y.-J. Yoon, C. R. Steele, and S. Puria, “Feed-forward and feed-backward amplification model from cochlear cytoarchitecture: an interspecies comparison,” Biophysical Journal 100(1), 110 (2011).
14.S. S. Narayan, A. N. Temchin, A. Recio, and M. A. Ruggero, “Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae,” Science 282(5395), 18821884 Dec. 1998.
15.A. Eustaquio-Martin and E. A. Lopez-Poveda, “Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning,” JARO 12, 281299 (2011).
16.E. Lopez-Poveda and A. Eustaquio-Martin, “On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 14(5), 673686 (2013).
17.K.-M. Lim and C. R. Steele, “A three-dimensional nonlinear active cochlear model analyzed by the WKB-numeric method,” Hearing Research 170(1–2), 190205 (2002).
18.Y. Raphael, M. Lenoir, R. Wroblewski, and R. Pujol, “The sensory epithelium and its innervation in the mole rat cochlea,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology 314(2), (1991).
19.Y. Yoon, S. Puria, and C. R. Steele, “A cochlear model using the time-averaged lagrangian and the push-pull mechanism in the organ of corti,” Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures 4(5), 977986 (2009).
20.Y.-J. Yoon, S. Puria, and C. R. Steele, “Intracochlear pressure and derived quantities from a three-dimensional model,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122(2), 952966 (2007).
21.C. D. Geisler and C. Sang, “A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces,” Hearing Research 86(1–2), 132146 (1995).
22.C. R. Steele and K. M. Lim, “Cochlear model with three-dimensional fluid, inner sulcus and feed-forward mechanism,” Audiology and Neurotology 4(3-4), 197203 (1999).
23.G. V. Bekesy, Theory of Hearing (AIP Press, New York, 1960).
24.L. Voldřich, “Experimental and topographic morphology in cochlear mechanics,” in Mechanics of Hearing, edited by E. de Boer and M. A. Viergever (Springer, Netherlands, 1983), pp. 163167.
25.G. V. Wever, Theory of Hearing (Wiley, New York, 1949).
26.M. Thorne, A. N. Salt, J. E. DeMott, M. M. Henson, O. W. J. Henson, and S. L. Gewalt, “Cochlear fluid space dimensions for six species derived from reconstructions of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images,” Laryngoscope 109, 16611668 (1999).
27.D. D. Greenwood, “A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87, 25922605 (1990).
28.S. Stenfelt, S. Puria, N. Hato, and R. L. Goode, “Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli,” Hearing Research 181(1–2), 131143 (2003).
29.T. Gundersen, O. Skarstein, and T. Sikkeland, “A study of the vibration of the basilar membrane in human temporal bone preparations by the use of the mössbauer effect,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 86(3-4), 225232 Oct. 1978.
30.B. C. J. Moore, “Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 524532 (1978).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Despite the advances in cochlear research, the estimation of auditory nerve fiber frequency tuning of human cochlea is mostly based on psychophysicalmeasurements. Although efforts had been made to estimate human frequency tuning sharpness from various physiological measurements which are less species dependent such as the compound action potential and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission delay, conclusions on the relative frequency tuning sharpness compared with that of other mammals vary. We simulated the biophysical human cochlea’s tuning curve based on physiological measurements of human cochlea and compared the human frequency tuning sharpness with results from empirical methods as well as experimental data of other mammalian cochleae. The compound action potential are more accurate at frequencies below 3 kHz while the stimulus frequency-otoacoustic emission delay are more accurate at frequencies above 1 kHz regions. The results from mechanical cochlearmodels, with support from conclusions of the other two empirical methodologies, suggest that the human frequency tuning sharpness at frequencies below 1 kHz is similar to common laboratory mammals but is exceptionally sharp at higher frequencies.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd