Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.J. Gonzalez, A. Rubio, F. Moll, and ICMR, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Materials Engineering For Resources (2001), Vol.1, p. 202.
2.S. Cagatay, B. Koc, and K. Uchino, Ieee Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 50, 782 (2003).
3.T. Ueno and S. Yamada, Ieee Transactions on Magnetics 47, 2407 (2011).
4.M. Staley, A. Flatau, and A. Flatou, Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 5764, 630 (2005).
5.C. Saha, T. O’Donnell, N. Wang, and R. McCloskey, Sensors and Actuators a-Physical 147, 248 (2008).
6.T. von Buren and G. Troster, Sensors and Actuators a-Physical 135, 765 (2007).
7.A. E. Clark, J. B. Restorff, M. Wun-Fogle, T. A. Lograsso, and D. L. Schlagel, Ieee Transactions on Magnetics 36, 3238 (2000).
8.J. Yoo, A. Flatau, and A. Purekar, in Proceedings of the Asme Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems (Smasis 2011) (2012), Vol.1, p. 391.
9.R. Haynes, J. Yoo, A. Flatau, N. Dhar, P. Balaya, and A. Dutta, Energy Harvesting and Storage: Materials, Devices, and Applications Iv 8728 (2013).
10.A. E. Clark, M. Wun-Fogle, J. B. Restorff, and T. A. Lograsso, Materials Transactions 43, 881 (2002).
11.S.-M. Na, M. Rice, G. Raghunath, V. Klimchenko, and A. Flatau, IEEE Trans. Magnetics 50, 4007104 (2014).
12.G. Raghunath, A. Flatau, S. Na, and B. Barkley, in Proceedings of the Asme Conference on Smart Materials Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, 2014 (2014), Vol.2.
13.A. Clark, J. Restorff, M. Wun-Fogle, E. Summers, and W. Armstrong, Smart Structures and Materials 2006: Active Materials: Behavior and Mechanics 6170, I1700 (2006).
14.J. Yoo and A. Flatau, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 23, 647 (2012).
15.S. Na and A. Flatau, Journal of Materials Science 49, 7697 (2014).
16.S. Na and A. Flatau, Journal of Applied Physics 115, 17A913-1 (2014).
17.S. Na and A. Flatau, Smart Materials and Structures 22, 125026 (2013).
18.J. Yoo, J. Restorff, M. Wun-Fogle, and A. Flatau, Smart Materials & Structures 18, 104004 (2009).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Magnetostrictive Fe-Ga and Fe-Al alloys are promising materials for use in bending-mode vibrational energy harvesters. For this study, 50.8 mm × 5.0 mm × 0.5 mm strips of Fe-Ga and Fe-Al were cut from 0.50-mm thick rolled sheet. An atmospheric anneal was used to develop a Goss texture through an abnormal grain growth process. The anneal lead to large (011) grains that covered over 90% of sample surface area. The resulting highly-textured Fe-Ga and Fe-Al strips exhibited saturationmagnetostriction values (λ =  λ − λ) of ∼280 ppm and ∼130 ppm, respectively. To maximize 90° rotation of magnetic moments during bending of the strips, we employed compressive stress annealing (SA). Samples were heated to 500°C, and a 100-150 MPa compressive stress was applied while at 500°C for 30 minutes and while being cooled. The effectiveness of the SA on magnetic moment rotation was inferred by comparing post-SA magnetostriction with the maximum possible yield of rotated magnetic moments, which is achieved when λ = λ and λ = 0. The uniformity of the SA along the sample length and the impact of the SA on sensing/energy harvesting performance were then assessed by comparing pre- and post-SA bending-stress-induced changes in magnetization at five different locations along the samples. The SA process with a 150 MPa compressive load improved Fe-Ga actuation along the sample length from 170 to 225 ppm (from ∼60% to within ∼80% of λ). The corresponding sensing/energy harvesting performance improved by as much as a factor of eight in the best sample, however the improvement was not at all uniform along the sample length. The SA process with a 100 MPa compressive load improved Fe-Al actuation along the sample length from 60 to 73 ppm (from ∼46% to ∼56% of λ, indicating only a marginally effective SA and suggesting the need for modification of the SA protocol. In spite of this, the SA was effective at improving the sensing/energy harvesting performance by a factor of ∼2.5 in the best sample. As with the Fe-Ga strip, improvement in performance was quite varied along the strip length.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd