Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/adva/6/6/10.1063/1.4954982
1.
A. Formhals, U.S. patent 1,975,504 (2 October 1934).
2.
Q. Zhang, J. Welch, H. Park, C.-Y. Wu, W. Sigmund, and J. C. Marijnissen, Journal of Aerosol Science 41, 230 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.10.001
3.
Y. Zhang, J. Li, G. An, and X. He, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 144, 43 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.10.012
4.
P. S. Archana, R. Jose, T. M. Jin, C. Vijila, M. M. Yusoff, and S. Ramakrishna, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 93, 4096 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04003.x
5.
S. Mollá and V. Compañ, Journal of Power Sources 196, 2699 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.022
6.
W. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, J. Liu, and X. Liu, Materials Letters 133, 67 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.163
7.
W. Y. Chen, Y. B. Liu, Y. Ma, and W. X. Yang, J. Power Sources 273, 1127 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.026
8.
H. S. Yoo, T. G. Kim, and T. G. Park, Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 61, 1033 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.007
9.
W. Cui, Y. Zhou, and J. Chang, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 11, 014108 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/11/1/014108
10.
A. Balguid, A. Mol, M. H. van Marion, R. A. Bank, C. V. Bouten, and F. P. Baaijens, Tissue Engineering Part A 15, 437 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0294
11.
L. Soletti, Y. Hong, J. Guan, J. J. Stankus, M. S. El-Kurdi, W. R. Wagner, and D. A. Vorp, Acta biomaterialia 6, 110 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.026
12.
S. J. Liu, Y. C. Kau, C. Y. Chou, J. K. Chen, R. C. Wu, and W. L. Yeh, J. Membrane Sci. 355, 53 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.012
13.
J. G. Merrell, S. W. McLaughlin, L. Tie, C. T. Laurencin, A. F. Chen, and L. S. Nair, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 36, 1149 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05216.x
14.
L. L. Guo, Y. B. Liu, and Y. Zheng, Adv. Materi. Res. 332, 2157 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.332-334.2157
15.
Y. B. Liu and L. L. Guo, J. Nanosci. Nanotechno 13, 843 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2013.6017
16.
Y. Liu and w. chen (2011).
17.
P. Li, Y. Liu, and J. Yao, Research on Sawtooth Type of Needleless Electrostatic Spinning (2010).
18.
Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, P. Li, and V. Thavasi, Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering, Pts 1 and 2 662, 103 (2013).
19.
K. H. Kim, L. Jeong, H. N. Park, S. Y. Shin, W. H. Park, S. C. Lee, T. L. Kim, Y. J. Park, Y. J. Seol, and Y. M. Lee, J. Biotechnol. 120, 327 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.06.033
20.
w. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Shen, and L. Guo, Journal of Textile Research 35, 1 (2014).
21.
W. Chen, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, and Y. Ma, 35, 21 (2014).
22.
Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, and W. Chen, Journal of Tianjin Polytechnic University 32, 20 (2013).
23.
D. Ding, H. Z. Wang, Y. G. Li, and Q. H. Zhang, J. Inorg. Mater. 28, 885 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1077.2013.12654
24.
L. Guo, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, and Y. Ma, Journal of Tianjin Polytechnic University 31, 23 (2012).
25.
O. Jirsak, F. Sanetrnik, and D. Lukas, WO2005024101-A1 (17 March2005).
26.
N. Haitao, L. Tong, and W. Xungai, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 114, 3524 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.30891
27.
T. Lin, X. G. Wang, X. Wang, and H. T. Niu, U.S. patent 8,747,093(10 June2014).
28.
T. Lin, X. Wang, X. Wang, and H. Niu, Google Patents,2014.
29.
X. Wang, H. T. Niu, X. G. Wang, and T. Lin, in Proceedings of the 38th Textile Research Symposium (2009), p. 117.
30.
H. v. Koch, Classics on Fractals (Addison-Wesley, 1993), p. 24.
31.
The Plantagenet Roll of the Blood Royal (Mortimer-Percy Volume) by the Marquis of Ruvigny and Raineval (1911).
32.
S. Jampala, in IEEE Proceedings of the 35th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (1992), p. 1024.
33.
B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Macmillan, 1983), Vol. 173.
36.
X. Kuang, Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Natural Science Edition),19, 75 (2006).
37.
Z. Qi, Electromagnetic Field (Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 2008).
38.
R. W. Pryor, Multiphysics Modeling Using Comsol: A First Principles Approach (Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2011).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/adva/6/6/10.1063/1.4954982
Loading
/content/aip/journal/adva/6/6/10.1063/1.4954982
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/adva/6/6/10.1063/1.4954982
2016-06-24
2016-12-04

Abstract

Needleless electrospinning technology is considered as a better avenue to produce nanofibrous materials at large scale, and electric field intensity and its distribution play an important role in controlling nanofiber diameter and quality of the nanofibrous web during electrospinning. In the current study, a novel needleless electrospinning method was proposed based on Von Koch curves of Fractal configuration, simulation and analysis on electric field intensity and distribution in the new electrospinning process were performed with Finite element analysis software, Comsol Multiphysics 4.4, based on linear and nonlinear Von Koch fractal curves (hereafter called fractal models). The result of simulation and analysis indicated that Second level fractal structure is the optimal linear electrospinning spinneret in terms of field intensity and uniformity. Further simulation and analysis showed that the circular type of Fractal spinneret has better field intensity and distribution compared to spiral type of Fractal spinneret in the nonlinear Fractal electrospinning technology. The electrospinning apparatus with the optimal Von Koch fractal spinneret was set up to verify the theoretical analysis results from Comsol simulation, achieving more uniform electric field distribution and lower energy cost, compared to the current needle and needleless electrospinning technologies.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/adva/6/6/1.4954982.html;jsessionid=Zs_pqMFJLqfucIqELFUoNVlI.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/adva/6/6/10.1063/1.4954982&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/adva
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=aipadvances.aip.org/6/6/10.1063/1.4954982&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva/6/6/10.1063/1.4954982'
Right1,Right2,Right3,