No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Artifacts in magnetic measurements of fluid samples
Y. T. Choi and N. M. Werely, “Vibration control of a landing gear system featuring electrorheological/magnetorheological fluids,” Journal of Aircraft 40, 432 (2003).
Y.-X. J. Wang, “Superparamagnetic iron oxide based MRI contrast agents: Current status of clinical application,” Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 1, 35 (2011).
C. L. Dennis, A. J. Jackson, J. A. Borchers, P. J. Hoopes, R. Strawbridge, A. R. Foreman, J. van Lierop, C. Gruttner, and R. Ivkov, “Nearly complete regression of tumors via collective behavior of magnetic nanoparticles in hyperthermia,” Nanotechnology 20, 395103 (2009).
H. Mamiya and B. Jeyadevan, “Hyperthermic effects of dissipative structures of magnetic nanoparticles in large alternating magnetic fields,” Sci. Rep. 1, 157 (2011).
S. G. Sherman, D. A. Paley, and N. M. Wereley, “Parallel simulation of transient magnetorheological direct shear flows using millions of particles,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 48, 3517 (2012).
A. P. Philipse and D. Maas, “Magnetic colloids from magnetotactic bacteria: chain formation and colloid stability,” Langmuir 18, 9977 (2002).
M. McElfresh, “Fundamentals of magnetism and magnetic measurements featuring Quantum Design’s Magnetic Property measurement System,” Tech. Rep. (Quantum Design, 1994).
W. Burgei, M. J. Pechan, and H. Jaeger, “A simple vibrating sample magnetometer for use in a materials physics course,” American Journal of Physics 71, 825 (2003).
Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper to foster understanding. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
J. Xu, K. Mahajan, W. Xue, J. Winter, M. Zborowski, and J. Chalmers, “Simultaneous, single particle, magnetization and size measurements of micron sized, magnetic particles,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 324, 4189 (2012).
A. L. Balk, C. Hangarter, S. M. Stavis, and J. Unguris, “Magnetometry of single ferromagnetic nanoparticles using magneto-optical indicator films with spatial amplification,” Applied Physics Letters 106, 112402 (2015).
“MPMS Application Note 1014-213 Subtracting the Sample Holder Background from Dilute Samples,” Quantum Design (2002).
Magnetic Property Measurement System SQUID-VSM User’s Manual, Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, 13th ed. (2010).
“SQUID VSM Application Note 1500-010 Rev. A0 Accuracy of the Reported Moment: axial and radial sample positioning error,” Quantum Design (2010).
“SQUID VSM Application Note 1500-015 Rev. A0 Accuracy of the Reported Moment: Sample Shape Effects,” Quantum Design (2010).
A. R. Zakinyan and L. S. Mkrtchyan, “Instability of the ferrofluid layer on a magnetizable substrate in a perpendicular magnetic field,” Magnetohydrodynamics 48, 615 (2012).
C. Grüttner, K. Müller, J. Teller, F. Westphal, A. Foreman, and R. Ivkov, “Synthesis and antibody conjugation of magnetic nanoparticles with improved specific power absorption rates for alternating magnetic field cancer therapy,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 311, 181 (2007).
The magnetic field gradient next to a permanent magnet is larger than that of a solenoid producing the magnetic field in a magnetometer. However, a solenoid is necessarily finite and therefore also produces a gradient.
G. Cheng, C. L. Dennis, R. D. Shull, and A. R. Hight Walker, “Influence of the Colloidal Environment on the Magnetic Behavior of Cobalt Nanoparticles,” Langmuir 23, 11740 (2007).
“MPMS Application Note 1014-208 Remnant Fields in MPMS Superconducting Magnets,” Quantum Design (2002).
Article metrics loading...
Applications of magnetic fluids are ever increasing, as well as the corresponding need to be able to characterize these fluids
in situ. Commercial magnetometers are accurate and well-characterized for solid and powder samples, but their use with fluid samples is more limited. Here, we describe artifacts which can occur in magnetic measurements of fluid samples and their impact. The most critical problem in the measurement of fluid samples is the dynamic nature of the sample position and size/shape. Methods to reduce these artifacts are also discussed, such as removal of air bubbles and dynamic centering.
Full text loading...
Most read this month