No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
ENHANCED STAGE I RECOVERY OF DEFORMED ALUMINUM
1.T. H. Blewitt, R. R. Coltman, and J. K. Redman, Rept. Conf. Defects Crystalline Solids, London (1955) p. 369.
2.A. Sosin and J. S. Koehler, Phys. Rev. 101, 972 (1956).
3.C. J. Meechan and A. Sosin, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 738 (1958).
4.M. L. Swanson, Can. J. Phys. 42, 1890 (1964).
5.J. W. Corbett, R. B. Smith, and R. M. Walker, Phys. Rev. 114, 1452, 1460 (1959).
6.M. L. Swanson, Can. J. Phys. 44, 3241 (1966).
7.A. N. Gerritsen, Handbuch der Physik 19, 156 (1956).
8.After the first deformation and isochronal anneal up to 100 °K, it is expected that no defects remain which can migrate below 60 °K (and this assumption is essential to the experiment, since the recovery after the second deformation is expressed as a fraction of only the second ). This assumption was verified by annealing at 60 °K after the 100 °K anneal.
9.C. Frois, Acta Met. 14, 1325 (1966).
10.S. Ceresara, H. Elkholy, and T. Federighi, Phil. Mag. 12, 1105 (1965).
11.Impurities can be excluded as effective sinks, since the concentration of defects introduced by the deformation is much greater than the impurity concentration.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month